Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 253–270 | Cite as

Students’ Responses to Improve Environmental Sustainability Through Recycling: Quantitatively Improving Qualitative Model

  • Muhammad Shakil Ahmad
  • Aqeel Ahmed Bazmi
  • Abdul Waheed Bhutto
  • Kanwal Shahzadi
  • Nadia Bukhari
Article

Abstract

This study attempts to contemplate the respondents’ behaviors regarding recycling, with the purpose of identifying the factors that influence their behaviors. The study is based on a survey that was conducted with 230 nationwide university students and guidelines borrowed from the Theory of Planned Behavior and The Theory of Reasoned action. The data collected was evaluated by applying the Structure Equation Modelling technique. The study concluded that peoples’ attitudes are largely subject to the moral values and general norms of their own society. Additionally, an individual’s response towards recycling is greatly determined by the extent of his/her awareness towards the environment, as well as his/her personal knowledge. Another conclusion was that an individual’s past experience towards recycling contributes to his/her attitude (willingness or apprehension about recycling) in the future. Furthermore, although the convenience and cost of recycling were found to be reasonably significant determinants about one’s recycling behavior, it was determined that time commitment is the most decisive factor that influences an individual’s willingness to or not to recycle. The study’s findings have not only established the authority of Theory of Planned Behaviour and Theory of Reasoned Action, but it has also presented propositions and recommendations for future research. The inferences were based on the study’s respondents, hence, so their validity can be applied to various scenarios involving local educational institutions or government structures. The goal of the study is to encourage people to engage in positive recycling behavior.

Keywords

Recycling behavior Subjective norms Moral norms Attitude Extent of concern Environmental sustainability 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behaviour relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Youjae, Y., & Baumgartner, J. (1990). The level of effort required for behaviour as a moderator of the attitude-behaviour relationship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. J. (2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards household-waste management. Environment and Planning, 33, 2025–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. H. (2009). Attitude and behavioural factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86, 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boldero, J. (1995). The prediction of household recycling of newspaper: the role of attitudes, intentions and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 440–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 31, 630–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, K. (1998). Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: waste recycling in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management, 52, 317–325.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, M. F., Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behaviour 42.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, S. F., Chan, D. K., & Wong, Z. S. (1999). Reexamining the theory of planned behaviour in understanding waste paper recycling. Environment and Behavior, 31, 587–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conner, M., & McMillan, B. (1999). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: studying cannabis use. The British Journal Social Psychology, 38, 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darby, L., & Obara, L. (2005). Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 44, 17–35.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Market Theory, 1, 29–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M. (2013). Environmental management in tourism: students’ perceptions and managerial practice in restaurants from a gender perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production.Google Scholar
  18. Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: the behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Do Valle, P. O., Rebelo, E., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioural theories to predict recycling involvement. Environment and Behaviour, 37, 364–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredericks, A. J., & Dossett, D. L. (1983). Attitude–behaviour relations: a comparison of the Fishbein–Ajzen and Bentler–Speckart models. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 45, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. González-Torre, P. L., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Ruiz-Torres, A. (2003). Some comparative factors regarding recycling collection systems in regions of the USA and Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Hassan A., Noordin T. A., Sulaiman S. (2010). The status on the level of environmental awareness in the concept of sustainable development amongst secondary school students, Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 1276–1280.Google Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucian connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behaviour: a synthesis of research results. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoyle, R. (1995). Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Juárez-Nájera, M., Rivera-Martínez, J. G., & Hafkamp, W. A. (2010). An explorative socio-psychological model for determining sustainable behavior: pilot study in German and Mexican universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 686–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly, T. C., Mason, I. G., Leiss, M. W., & Ganesh, S. (2006). University community responses to on-campus resource recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 47, 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., & Wells, M. (2004). An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behaviour model. Social Psychology, 47, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu, X., Tanaka, M., & Matsui, Y. (2009). Economic evaluation of optional recycling processes for waste electronic home appliances. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2004). Recycling: planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDonald, S., & Ball, R. (1998). Public participation in plastics recycling schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 22, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neo, H. (2007). Challenging the developmental state: nature conservation in Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ng R., Shi C. W. P., Tan H. X., Song B. (2013). Avoided impact quantification from recycling of wood waste in Singapore: an assessment of pallet made from technical wood versus virgin softwood. Journal of Cleaner Production.Google Scholar
  36. Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oskamp, S. (1995). Resource conservation and recycling: behaviour and policy. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., Strading, S. G., Reason, J. T., & Baxter, J. S. (1992). Intentions to commit driving violations: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perron, G. M., Côté, R. P., & Duffy, J. F. (2006). Improving environmental awareness training in business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Riaz, A., Zahedi, G., & Klemeš, J. J. (2013). A review of cleaner production methods for the manufacture of methanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez-Barreiro, L. M., Fernández-Manzanal, R., Serra, L. M., Carrasquer, J., Murillo, M. B., Morales, M. J., Calvo, J. M., & Valle, J. (2013). Approach to a causal model between attitudes and environmental behaviour. A graduate case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saphores, J. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2006). Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: an application to California. Environment and Behaviour, 38, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sardinha, I. D., Craveiro, D., & Milheiras, S. (2013). A sustainability framework for redevelopment of rural brownfields: stakeholder participation at SÃO DOMINGOS mine, Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw, P. J. (2008). Nearest neighbour effects in kerbside household waste recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sidique, S. F., Joshi, S. V., & Lupi, F. (2010a). Factors influencing the rate of recycling: an analysis of Minnesota counties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sidique, S. F., Lupi, F., & Joshi, S. V. (2010b). The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tonglet, M. (2000). Consumer misbehaviour: consumers’ perceptions of shoplifting and retail security. Security Journal, 13, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tucker, P. (1999). Normative influences in household waste recycling. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vicente-Molina M. A., Fernández-Sáinz A., Izagirre-Olaizola J. (2013). Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production.Google Scholar
  53. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and behavior, 22, 55–73.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 977–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang P., Liu Q., Qi Y. (2013). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production.Google Scholar
  56. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Shakil Ahmad
    • 1
  • Aqeel Ahmed Bazmi
    • 2
  • Abdul Waheed Bhutto
    • 3
  • Kanwal Shahzadi
    • 4
  • Nadia Bukhari
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Management SciencesCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyAttockPakistan
  2. 2.Process & Energy Systems Engineering Center-PRESTIGE, Department of Chemical EngineeringCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyLahorePakistan
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringDawood University of Engineering & TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Management SciencesCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyAttockPakistan

Personalised recommendations