Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 253–262 | Cite as

Is Having a Taste of Luxury a Good Idea? How Use vs. Ownership of Luxury Products Affects Satisfaction with Life

Article

Abstract

Previous research showing that luxury consumption can be beneficial for one’s well-being equate consumption with ownership. The current paper experimentally investigates whether the impact of luxury consumption on one’s satisfaction with life differs when this consumption implies ownership versus mere use of (democratized) luxury products. While we find that ownership of luxury products is associated with a higher satisfaction with life compared to ownership of non-luxury products, the mere use of luxuries decreases an individual’s satisfaction with life. This finding is obtained for both a durable (a pen) and a non-durable (a chocolate).

Keywords

Luxury consumption Satisfaction with life Social comparison Mere use 

References

  1. Ball, R. E., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income, and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (forthcoming). Happiness from ordinary and extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research. doi: 10.1086/674724.
  3. Boes, S., Staub, K., & Winkelmann, R. (2010). Relative status and satisfaction. Economics Letters, 109(3), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogaerts, T., & Pandelaere, M. (2013). Less is more: why some domains are more positional than others. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39(December), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21(4), 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, G. D. A., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J., & Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being? Industrial Relations, 47(3), 355–389.Google Scholar
  7. Christen, M., & Morgan, R. M. (2005). Keeping up with the Joneses: analyzing the effect of income inequality on consumer borrowing. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3(2), 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: the impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1997). Social comparisons and subjective well-being. In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 329–357). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures (pp. 185–218). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluations, while psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittman, J., & Goebel, J. (2010). Your house, your car, your education: the socioeconomic situation of the neighborhood and its impact on life satisfaction in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 96(3), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever. Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujita, F. (2008). The frequency of social comparison and its relation to subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 239–257). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Guillen-Royo, M. (2008). Consumption and subjective well-being: exploring basic needs, social comparison, social integration and hedonism in Peru. Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulas, C. S., & McKeage, K. (2000). Extending social comparison: an examination of the unintended consequences of idealized advertising imagery. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guven, C., & SØrensen, B. E. (2012). Subjective well-being: keeping up with the perception of the Joneses. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heidrich, S. M. (1999). Self-discrepancy across the life span. Journal of Adult Development, 6(2), 119–130.Google Scholar
  26. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hopkins, E., & Kornienko, T. (2004). Running to keep in the same place. Consumer choice as a game of status. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1085–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hsee, C. K., Xu, F., & Tang, N. (2008). Two recommendations on the pursuit of happiness. The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(3), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: the impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hudders, L., Pandelaere, M., & Vyncke, P. (2013). Consumer meaning making: the meaning of luxury brands in a democratized luxury world. International Journal of Market Research, 55(3), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kashdan, T. B., & Breen, W. E. (2007). Materialism and diminished well-being: experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(5), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn, P., Kooreman, P., Soetevent, A., & Kapteyn, A. (2011). The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: evidence from the Dutch postcode lottery. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2226–2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. USA: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  35. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
  36. Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mentzakis, E., & Moro, M. (2009). The poor, the rich and the happy: exploring the link between income and subjective well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicolao, L., Irwin, J. R., & Goodman, J. K. (2009). Happiness for sale: do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: when equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1998). The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richins, M. L. (1991). Social comparison and the idealized images of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richins, M. L. (1995). Social comparison, advertising, and consumer discontent. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(4), 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richins, M. L. (2013). When wanting Is better than having: Materialism, transformation expectations, and product-evoked emotions in the purchase process. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(June), 1–18.Google Scholar
  44. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. Google Scholar
  45. Roberts, J. A., & Pirog, S. (2004). Personal goals and their role in consumer behavior: the case of compulsive buying. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(3), 61–73.Google Scholar
  46. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silverstein, M. J., & Fiske, N. (2003). Trading up: The new American luxury. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Sirgy, J. M. (2012). The psychology of quality of life. Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and Eudaimonia (2nd Edition). Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 50). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Sivanathan, N., & Pettit, N. C. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Teichmann, K. (2011). Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 889–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210.Google Scholar
  52. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Veblen, T. (1899/1979). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  54. Winkelmann, R. (2012). Conspicuous consumption and satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yeoman, I., & McMahon-Beattie, U. (2006). Luxury markets and premium pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4(4), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhong, J. Y., & Mitchell, V. (2010). A mechanism model of the effect of hedonic product consumption on well-being. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of MarketingGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations