Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inequality and Social Heterogeneity in Self-Reported Health Status in the Tunisian Population: An Analysis Using the MIMIC Model

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a MIMIC model with structural equations and two synthetic health scores, this study attempts to explore the impact of the measurement of health status on socioeconomic inequalities in health. The results showed satisfactory internal consistency for both summary measures that are the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). A Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary calculated from the Short Form health survey (SF-12) items showed the same magnitude of health state and degree of change overtime; Cronbach’s α for PCS-12 and MCS-12 was .93 and .86, respectively. Known subgroups comparison showed that the SF-12 discriminated well between men and women and those who differed in age and educational status. In addition, results suggest the existence of reporting heterogeneity biases for a given latent health state, women and old people are more likely to report physical activity limitations; Mental health problems are over-reported by women and divorced people and under-reported by the oldest people; Clerks, farmers and retired as well as employees and homemakers in the top of the social hierarchy more often report physical activity limitations. Finally, highly educated and socially advantaged people more often report social activities limitations due to the problems of physical and mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bound, J. (1991). Self-reported versus objective measures of health in retirement models. The Journal of Human Resources, 26, 106–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstad, J. I. (1996). How large are the differences-really? Self-reported long standing illness working class and middle class men. Sociology of Health an Illness, 18(4), 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadis, S., & Robinson, G. E. (2007). Gender issues in depression. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 19(4), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhofs, M., & Lindeboom, M. (1995). Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errors. Health Economics, 4, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach, J. P., Looman, C. W., & Van Der Meer, J. B. (1996). Differences in the misreporting of chronic conditions, by level of education: the effect on inequalities in prevalence rates. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 706–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moessgaard, Iburg, K. M., Salomon, J. A., Tandon, A., & Murray, C. J. L. (2002). Cross-population comparability of physician-assessed and self-reported measures of health. In C. J. L. Murray, J. A. Salomon, C. Mathers, & A. D. Lopez (Eds.), Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications (pp. 433–448). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdaugh, C. (1997). Health-related quality of life as an outcome in organizational research. Medical Care, 35, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli, A. (2002). Reporting heterogeneity in the measurement of health and health-related quality of life. PharmacoEconomics, 20(6), 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli, A. (2003). Socio-economic and demographic variation in health and in its measures: the issue of reporting heterogeneity. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorslaer, E., & Gerdtham, U. G. (2003). Does inequality in self-assessed health predict inequality in survival by income? Evidence from Swedish data. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1621–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorslaer, E., & Jones, A. (2003). Inequalities in self-reported health: validation of a new approach to measurement. In: Workshop on health economics and public policy. Journal of Health Economics, 22(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. L. (2004). The difference between single and married mothers in the 12-month prevalence of major depressive syndrome, associated factors and mental health service utilization. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36).I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston. MA: The Health Institute. New England Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1998). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (3rd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1998). Health promotion glossary. Department of Mental Health and Substance Misuse. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for the useful comments made.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moheddine Younsi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Younsi, M., Chakroun, M. Inequality and Social Heterogeneity in Self-Reported Health Status in the Tunisian Population: An Analysis Using the MIMIC Model. Applied Research Quality Life 9, 79–97 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9217-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9217-y

Keywords

Navigation