Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 239–261 | Cite as

Measuring Social Sustainability: A Community-Centred Approach

Article

Abstract

Efforts to measure social and community sustainability confront a series of methodological dilemmas. We present four key distinctions that tend to orient such efforts: between objective and subjective assessment; between “communities” as the sum-of-their-parts, or as holistic and distinct entities in themselves; between present and future aspects to be measured; and between use of “top–down” and “bottom–up” indicators. We then propose a questionnaire for sustainability assessment in light of these. We administered the questionnaire to various communities in the Middle East, South and South East Asia between 2006 and 2010, and present descriptive summaries and a factor analysis of the results here. The results serve two aims: to augment existing qualitative research conducted in the respective areas, and to test the validity and reliability of the instrument itself. Several limitations of the questionnaire emerged during analysis, which we discuss. The results also show strong correlation with national Human Development Index figures for the communities surveyed and moreover, point to several interesting attitudinal divergences between the communities sampled. We conclude with an outline of a revised sustainability assessment instrument that has application for research looking to bridge the gap between psychological orientations towards wellbeing, on the one hand, and sociological or organizational studies on sustainability, on the other hand.

Keywords

Community Wellbeing Quality of life Sustainability Indicators 

References

  1. Agger, A. (2010). Involving citizens in sustainable development: evidence of new forms of participation in the Danish agenda 21 schemes. Local Environment, 15(6), 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assche, J., Block, T., & Reynaert, H. (2010). Can community indicators live up to their expectations? The case of the Flemish city monitor for liveable and sustainable urban development. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(4), 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, G. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balana, B. B., Mathijs, E., & Muys, B. (2010). Assessing the sustainability of forest management: an application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in northern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1294–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohringer, C., & Jochem, P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable—a survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30–48.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. A. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and Ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom-line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2008). A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(4–5), 286–311.Google Scholar
  13. Hagerty, M. R. (1999). Unifying livability and comparison theory: cross-national time-series analysis of life-satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 47(1), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hettelingh, J., Vries, B. J. M. D., & Hordijk, L. (2009). Integrated assessment. Principles of environmental sciences. Springer: Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Holden, M. (2007). Revisiting the local impact of community indicators projects: sustainable Seattle as prophet in its own land. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3–4), 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Human Development Report Office, (2010). HDI 2010 index. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/Lets-Talk-HD-HDI_2010.pdf.
  17. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R., & Basanez, M. (2000). World values survey. USA and Mexico.Google Scholar
  21. James, P., Nadarajah, Y., Haive, K., & Stead, V. (2011). Sustainable communities, sustainable development: other paths for Papua New Guinea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  22. James, P., Stead, V., Nadarajah, Y., & Haive, K. (2011). Urban and peri-urban communities: Vanagi settlement, central province; Divinai village, Milne Bay province; Kananam community, Madang province; Yalu village and surrounds, Morobe province. Local–global Papua New Guinea: Projecting Community-Life, 5, 18–62.Google Scholar
  23. Kilbourne, W. E. (2006). The role of the dominant social paradigm in the quality of life/environmental interface. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2005). A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43(2), 189–208.Google Scholar
  25. Kruger, P. S. (2010). Wellbeing—the five essential elements. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, N. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, F., et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Thai “global person generated index”, an individualised measure of quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matarrita-Cascante, D. (2010). Changing communities, community satisfaction, and quality of life: a view of multiple perceived indicators. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCrea, R., Shyy, T.-K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: evidence of differential associations with self-reported. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  33. Mulligan, M., & Shaw, J. (2007). What the world can learn from Sri Lanka’s post-tsunami experiences. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 3(2), 65–91.Google Scholar
  34. Munda, G. (2005). ‘Measuring sustainability’: a multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rojas, M. (2011). Happiness, income, and beyond. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010a). Accounting for sustainability: combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing ‘indicators’ of sustainability. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010b). Communities of citizens and “indicators” of sustainability. Community Development Journal, 45(2), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scerri, A., James, P., Humphery, K., & Mulligan, M. (2009). Towards meaningful indicators of wellbeing—community arts, inclusion and avowal in local–global relationships. In S. Fleming (Ed.), Leisure and tourism: international perspectives on cultural practice (pp. 67–78). Liverpool: LSA Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Schilperoord, M., Rotmans, J., & Bergman, N. (2008). Modelling societal transitions with agent transformation. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14(4), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh, R., Murty, H., Gupta, S., & Dikshit, A. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sirgy, M. J. (2010). Societal QOL is more than the sum of QOL of individuals: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United Nations. (1992a). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). Rio de Janeiro: UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
  46. United Nations. (1992b). Rio declaration on environment and development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). Rio de Janeiro: UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
  47. Veenhoven, R. (2009). Happy life years in 143 nations 2000–2008. World database of happiness, Rank report 2009-2a.Google Scholar
  48. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, J., Tyedmers, P., & Pelot, R. (2007). Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 299–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V./The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Global Studies, Social Science and PlanningRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.RMIT UniversityCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations