Does More Money Make You Happier? Why so much Debate?

Article

Abstract

Easterlin’s famous paradox questioned standard economic assumptions about a fundamental relationship in economics: that between happiness and income. In recent years there has been renewed debate about the paradox. In this essay, I highlight some of the methodological issues and challenges underlying that debate. I focus on the sensitivity of the results to the method selected, the choice of micro or macro data, and the way that happiness questions are defined and framed, all of which result in divergent conclusions. I also note the mediating role of the pace and nature of economic growth, institutional frameworks, and inequality. What is most notable is the remarkable consistency in the determinants of individual happiness – including income – within countries of diverse income levels and, at the same time, how happiness is affected by cross-country differences that are related to average per-capita income levels, such as political freedom and public goods. Income clearly plays a role in determining both individual and country level happiness. Still, assessing its role relative to other more difficult to measure factors as countries develop in new ways and at different rates will remain a challenge for the foreseeable future.

Keywords

Happiness Income Quality of life Well-being Adaptation 

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benabou, R., & Ok, E. (1998). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis. NBER Working Paper 6795. Cambridge: NBER.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brauer, M., & Graham, C. (2010). Inequality, class perceptions, and happiness in the United States from 1973–2010. Washington: The Brookings Institution. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  5. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2).Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Boston: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111.Google Scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. (2008). Lost in transition: life Satisfaction on the road to capitalism. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No.3049.Google Scholar
  14. Eggers, A., Gaddy, C., & Graham, C. (2006). Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990’s: can society’s suffering provide individual solace. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey, B. (2008). Happiness: A revolution in economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gasparini, L., Escudero, W. S., Marchionni, M., & Olivieri, S. (2009). Objective and subjective deprivation. In C. Graham, E. Lora (Eds.) Paradox and perception: Measuring quality of life in Latin America. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, C. (2010). Adapting to prosperity and adversity: lessons from happiness studies from around the world. World Bank Research Observer.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2008). Public opinion trends in Latin America (and the U.S.): How strong is support for markets, democracy, and regional Integration? Paper prepared for the Brookings Partnership for the Americas Commission: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2009). Happiness in Afghanistan: some insights from surveys of public opinion and well-Being. World Economics, 10(3)Google Scholar
  21. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Does inequality matter to individual welfare: an exploration based on happiness surveys in Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, C., & Lora, E. (2009). Happiness and health satisfaction across countries. In C. Graham & E. Lora (Eds.), Paradox and perception: Measuring quality of life in Latin America. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002a). Happiness and hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002b). Frustrated achievers: winners, losers, and subjective well-being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38(4), 100–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, C., & Young, P. (2003). Ignorance fills the income gulf. The Boston Globe, June 23.Google Scholar
  26. Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An initial exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 319–342.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010a). Adapting to adversity: happiness and the 2009 economic crisis in the United States. Social Research, 77(2), 715–748.Google Scholar
  28. Graham, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010b). The Easterlin and other paradoxes: Why both sides of the debate may be correct. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Graham, C., Higuera, L., & Lora, E. (2011). Which health conditions make you most unhappy? Health Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Helliwell, J. (2008). Life satisfaction and quality of development. Mimeo, University of British Columbia: BC.Google Scholar
  31. Helliwell, J., Haifang Huang, H., & Harris, A. (2008). International differences in the determinants of life satisfaction. Mimeo, University of British Columbia: BCGoogle Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: a global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4).Google Scholar
  33. Inter-American Development Bank. (2008). Beyond facts: Understanding quality of life in Latin America. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). Does money buy happiness….or just a better life. Princeton: Princeton University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  35. Kingdon, G., & Knight, J. (2007). Communities, comparisons, and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64(1)Google Scholar
  36. Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2007). Great expectations? The subjective well-being of rural-urban migrants in China. Discussion Paper Series No. 322. Oxford: Department of Economics, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Lora, E., & Chaparro, C. (2011). The complex relation between satisfaction and income. In C. Graham C. & E. Lora (Eds.), The quality of life paradox: Some insights from Latin America. Washington: The Brookings Institution and the Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3).Google Scholar
  39. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2005). Who cares about relative deprivation effects. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3782. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development, and growth. Paper Presented to the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  41. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-Being: Re-assessing the Easterlin Paradox. In Brookings panel on economic activity. Washington: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  42. Whyte, M., & Hun, C. (2006). Subjective well-being and mobility attitudes in China. Cambridge: Harvard University. Mimeo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V./The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Brookings InstitutionUniversity of MarylandWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations