The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life

  • Leo W. JeffresEmail author
  • Cheryl C. Bracken
  • Guowei Jian
  • Mary F. Casey


Older cities struggling with issues of survival focus on jobs and the economy, but competition requires all cities to pay attention to the quality of life that attracts residents. Creating such an inviting environment includes “third places” that foster community and communication among people outside of home and work, yet we have little empirical evidence that speaks to the subject, or their importance for a community’s quality of life. Here we report on a national U.S. survey that asked people to identify such places in their community, producing a wide variety of “third places” that ranged from the most popular community centers, coffee shops and restaurants to parks and malls. While a few relationships are found between population/diversity and the popularity of particular third places, the most important result confirms a hypothesized relationship between perceptions that third places are accessible in their community and the perceived quality of life.


Third places Communication Community quality of life Urban Communication Constructed Environment 


  1. Andrews, F. M. (Ed.) (1986). Research on the quality of life. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Audirac, I., & Fitzgerald, J. (2003). Information technology (IT) and urban form: an annotated bibliography of the urban deconcentration and economic restructuring literatures. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(4), 480–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, F., & Palmer, C. (2002). Opportunity structures: Urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health Promotion International, 17, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. K., & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dekker, K. (2007). Social capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. A case study in the Hague and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 22(3), 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R. J., & Nickell, E. (2004). Designing for sociability in massively multiplayer games: An examination of the “third places” of SWG. In J. H. Smith & M. Sicart (Eds.), Proceedings of the other players conference. Copenhagen: IT University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  8. Florida, R. (2002a). Rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Florida, R. (2002b). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florida, R. (2002c). Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Florida, R. (2005a). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2005b). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2008). Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: Exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1451–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, D., Jones, A. W., & Trautner, M. N. (2004). Social Forces, 83, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, K. (2008, Nov. 5). WiFi gains strength in cities. Washington Post, p. D01 suburban edition.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R., & Rabier, J. (1986). Aspirations adapt to situations-but why are the Belgians so much happier than the French? In F. Andrews (Ed.), Research on the quality of life (pp. 1–56). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  18. Jeffres, L., & Lee, J-won. (2002). Neighborhood newspapers. In L. W. Jeffres (Ed.), Urban communication systems: Neighborhoods and the search for community (pp. 89–116). Cresskill: Hampton.Google Scholar
  19. Jeffres, L. W., Jian, G., & Yoon, S. (2007, November). Conceptualizing Communication Capital for Civic Engagement. (2007). Paper presented to the Political Communication Division at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, November, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  20. Kearney, A. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kempf, A. M., & Remington, P. L. (2007). New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krizek, Robert Lee (1995). The ethnography of events: A narrative analysis of non-routine public events. Dissertation. Arizona State University. ProQuest document ID: 742113691. Publication number: AAT 9533385.Google Scholar
  23. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lofland, L. (1998). The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  25. Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1/2), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCann, E. J. (2004). ‘Best places’: Interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse. Urban Studies, 41(10), 1909–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McTavish, K., & Salamon, S. (2001). Mobile home park on the prairie: A new rural community form. Rural Sociology, 66, 487–506.Google Scholar
  28. Michalos, A. (1986). Job satisfaction, marital satisfaction and the quality of life: A review and a preview. In F. Andrews (Ed.), Research on the quality of life (pp. 57–83). Ann Arbor: Survey Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  29. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. New York: Marlowe.Google Scholar
  30. Oldenburg, R., & Brissett, D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1/2), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paskaleva-Shapira, K. A. (2007). New paradigms of city tourism management: Redefining destination promotion. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Quinn, B. (2005). Arts festivals and the city. Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 927–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuessler, K., & Fisher, G. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shapira, R., & Navon, D. (1991). Alone together: Public and private dimensions of a Tel-Aviv cafe. Qualitative Sociology, 14, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, B. (2003). The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soukup, C. (2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 8, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tolbert, C. M., II. (2005). Minding our own business: Local retail establishments and the future of southern civic community. Social Forces, 83, 1309–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tolbert, C. M., Irwin, M. D., Lyson, T. A., & Nucci, A. R. (2002). Civic community in small-town America, How civic welfare is influenced by local capitalism and civic engagement. Rural Sociology, 67, 90–113.Google Scholar
  41. Traeen, B., & Rossow, I. (1994). Social characteristics of urban café guests in Norway. Addiction, 89, 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts. A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1/2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, W. E., III. (2004). Beyond dollars and cents: Using civic capital to fashion urban improvements. City and Community, 3(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. While, A., Jonas, A. E. G., & Gibbs, D. (2004). The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, D. (2006). Why game studies now? Gamers don’t bowl alone. Games and Culture, 1, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wong, N.C. (2007, Oct. 26). NYC-Boston bus offers reservations. Vamoose routes to have WiFi access, guaranteed seats, The Boston Globe, p. F1 third edition.Google Scholar
  47. Young, C., Diep, M., & Drabble, S. (2006). Living with difference? The ‘cosmopolitan city’ and urban reimaging in Manchester, UK”. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1687–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V./The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leo W. Jeffres
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cheryl C. Bracken
    • 1
  • Guowei Jian
    • 1
  • Mary F. Casey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of CommunicationCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations