Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Needs, Wants and Goals: Wellbeing, Quality of Life and Public Policy

Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

This paper considers the possible contribution of Quality of Life methods in international development policy and practice. It discusses the role of theories of human needs in how public policy makers and implementors might distinguish between ‘needs’ and ‘wants’. There is a good case for extending theories of human need to encompass social and psychological needs, but when we do so the ability of theory to distinguish between ‘needs’ and ‘wants’ begins to evaporate. Rather, by virtue of the core relationship between needs denial and harm, it is argued that a theory of human need can provide a framework for reasoning about what constitute needs. Empirical quality of life data can then assist policy makers to identify what constitute needs satisfiers in particular societal and cultural contexts. They also can provide important information to enable processes of public reasoning about the relative societal importance of different needs claims. The paper uses data generated through the application of two Quality of Life methods in Southern and Northeast Thailand, which were employed as part of a comprehensive study of the social and cultural construction of wellbeing in developing countries, to illustrate its arguments. The paper concludes that if routinely incorporated into local policy process, such quality of life methods have a possible contribution to make to effective democratic governance for development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Baumeister and Leary’s comprehensive review (1995) also found a strong correlation between meeting needs for social relationships and SWB.

  2. During the analysis conceptually similar areas were grouped together under single category headings (for example, Money, assets where a respondent specifically mentioned money, assets, wealth, or riches). Little grouping was required, however, suggesting that people understood the task and responded in summary form, hence the importance of the accompanying interview in interpreting the data.

  3. Metta-karuna is a Sanskrit term meaning 'loving-kindness', which is an important practice for Thai Buddhists.

  4. Significance was tested using t-test or ANOVA as appropriate and reported at ps ≤ 0.001.

  5. Although these were not significant after Bonferroni correction.

  6. People aged over 65 reported ‘education for yourself’ as less necessary than those aged 25 to 44, but this was hardly unexpected.

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18, 119–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2007). Measuring freedoms alongside wellbeing. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: from theory to research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). The subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research, 76, 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. R. (1972). The taxonomy of social need. In G. McLachlan (Ed.), Problems and progress in medical care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (1994). The contextualisation and measurement of need: a social policy perspective. In J. Popay & G. Williams (Eds.), Researching the people's health. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, M. B., Fredell, K. A., & Frideres, J. S. (1997). Basic minimum needs, quality of life and selected correlates: explorations in villages in northern India. Social Indicators Research, 42, 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L. (2002). Measuring quality of life in dystonia: an ethnography of contested representations. Thesis (PhD).

  • Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1039–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., & Converse, P. (1972). Human meaning of social change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2000). Concepts and perceptions of development: Some evidence from the Western Cape (Working Paper 88). Cape Town: University of Cape Town, South Africa Labour and Development Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, J. G. (2008). Is wellbeing relevant to international development policy and practice? Journal of International Development, 19, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. L., & Stokes, M. (2004). HRQOL and subjective wellbeing: non-complementary forms of outcome measurement. Expert Reviews in Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research, 4, 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J., Camfield, L., & Gough, I. (2007). Autonomy or Dependence - or Both? Perspectives From Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, . doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9022-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A. (2004). Famine that kills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Ney, S. (1998). Missing persons: a critique of personhood in the social sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2004). Subjective and Objective Wellbeing in Relation to Economic Inputs: Puzzles and Responses. WeD Working Paper No. 9. University of Bath.

  • Gough, I. (2003). rethinking human needs and well-being. Newsletter of the ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD), 1(2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I., & McGregor, J. A. (eds). (2007). Wellbeing in developing countries: from theory to research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I., McGregor, J. A., & Camfield, L. (2007). Introduction: conceiving wellbeing in development contexts. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: from theory to research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillen-Royo, M., Velazco, J. (2005). Exploring the relationship between happiness, objective and subjective well-being: evidence from rural Thailand. Paper presented at the Capabilities and Happiness Conference 16–18 June 2005.

  • Guillen-Royo, M. (2008). Consumption and subjective wellbeing: exploring basic needs, social comparison, social integration and hedonism in Peru. Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 535–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. (1998). Retracing the oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan. BMJ, 316, 1965–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2003). The Political Philosophy of Needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. (1999). The researcher's tale: a story of virtue lost and regained. Quality of Life Research, 8(7), 556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongudomkarn, D., & Camfield, L. (2006). Exploring the quality of life of people in north eastern and southern Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 78, 489–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Kanner, A. D., Cohn, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Psychology and American corporate capitalism: further reflections and future directions. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. (1996). Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavers, T. (2008). Asking people what they want or telling them what they ‘need’? Contrasting a theory of human need with local expressions of goals. Social Indicators Research, 86, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M., Elizalde, A., Hopenhayn, M. with the cooperation of Herrera, F., Zemelman, H., Jatobá, J., Weinstein, L. (1989). Human scale development: an option for the future. Development Dialogue, 1, 1–80.

  • McGregor, J. A. (2004). Researching well-being: communicating between the needs of policy makers and the needs of the people. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A. (2007). Researching wellbeing: from concepts to methodology. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: from theory to research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A. (2008) ‘Wellbeing, Poverty and Conflict’ WeD Briefing Paper 01/08. WeD Research Group, University of Bath. http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/bp/bp1-08.pdf.

  • Offer, A. (2006). The challenge of affluence: self-control and well-being in the United States and Britain since 1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, F. C. (1985). Basic needs in rural Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 17(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the patient generated index (PGI). Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, D. A. (1998). Patient generated assessment: the next generation. MAPI Quality of Life Newsletter, 20, 461–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, D. A., Camfield, L., & Martin, F. (2004). Assessing individual quality of life in developing countries: piloting a global PGI in Ethiopia and Bangladesh. Quality of Life Research, 13, 1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Sapp, A. (2007). Basic psychological needs: a self-determination theory perspective on the promotion of wellness across development and cultures. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: from theory to research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1974). Stone-age economics. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (1989). The economics of development: a survey. Economic Journal, 99(127), 597–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2002). Beyond the new paternalism: basic security as equality. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1995). Human development: the debate about the index. International Social Science Journal, 47, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. F. (1987). Political ethics and public office. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, A., Camfield, L., McGregor, J. A., Martin, F. (2008). Validation of the WeDQoL-Goals-Thailand measure: culture-specific individualized quality of life. Social Indicators Research (in press, online as dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9357-x).

  • Woodhead, M. (1987). The needs of children: is there any value in the concept? Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully acknowledged. The work was part of the program of the ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries. The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the research teams in Prince of Songkhla and Khon Kaen Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK

    J. Allister McGregor

  2. Young Lives, Department of International Development-Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford, England, UK

    Laura Camfield

  3. Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK

    Alison Woodcock

Authors
  1. J. Allister McGregor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Camfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alison Woodcock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Allister McGregor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGregor, J.A., Camfield, L. & Woodcock, A. Needs, Wants and Goals: Wellbeing, Quality of Life and Public Policy. Applied Research Quality Life 4, 135–154 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9069-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9069-7

Keywords

search

Navigation