Skip to main content
Log in

The Vulnerability Paradox in Global Mental Health: Psychologist Density, Social Development, and the Disease Burden of Mental Disorder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global efforts underscore the imperative of increasing the mental health workforce to improve mental health. However, the “vulnerability paradox” in global mental health questions the effectiveness of increased workforce. Evidence is lacking on whether mental health workforce input can reduce the disease burden of mental disorders at different levels of social development. Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, United Nations Statistics, and Our World in Data and all data are publicly available. The concentration index (CCI) and slope index (SI) were used to assess psychologist density inequality across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Generalized additive mixed model was used to analyze the nonlinear associations among psychologist density, the socio-demographic index (SDI), and age-standardized rates (ASRs) of DALY for mental disorders. Psychologist density increased globally from 1990 to 2019, excluding Zimbabwe. The psychologist density SI increased from 3.8 in 1990 to 10.5 in 2019. CCI decreased from 66.8 in 1990 to 52.8 in 2019. The psychologists were concentrated in countries and territories with higher SDI rankings. Psychologist density had a negative nonlinear association with DALY ASR (EDF, 5.86; P<.001), with a slowing decline as psychologist density increased. SDI correlated positively with DALY ASRs (EDF, 6.36; P<.001). In the interaction between psychologist density and SDI, as SDI increased, the impact of the increase in psychologist density on the reduction of DALY ASRs for mental disorders gradually weakened. Despite an overall increase, substantial global inequality persists in psychologist density. Psychologist density has a notable negative nonlinear association with the disease burden of mental disorders, with varying input-response relationships across different SDI levels. Formulating equity-oriented mental health workforce policies and allocating resources to low human resources for mental health and underdeveloped areas are imperative. And consider reshaping mental health services rather than just increasing the mental health workforce, especially in high-development areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 71974114].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yifan Chen: Conceptualization (lead); formal analysis (lead); methodology (lead); software (lead); visualization (lead); writing, original draft (lead); writing, review and editing (equal); data curation (lead); validation (equal). Xiao Li: Methodology (supporting), validation (equal), supervision (supporting), writing—review and editing (equal). Yunxi Zhong: Software (supporting), writing, review and editing (lead). Qixiu Li: Writing—review and editing (equal). Xiaoying Su: Writing—review and editing (equal). Long Sun: Conceptualization (supporting); funding acquisition (lead); project administration (lead); supervision (lead); writing, review and editing (lead); validation (equal); data curation (supporting); validation (equal); resources (lead).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

No ethics approval needed.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 59240 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Li, X., Zhong, Y. et al. The Vulnerability Paradox in Global Mental Health: Psychologist Density, Social Development, and the Disease Burden of Mental Disorder. Int J Ment Health Addiction (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01331-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01331-y

Keywords

Navigation