‘I’ll Just Pay the Rent Next Month’: an Exploratory Study Examining Facilitatory Cognitions Among EGM Problem Gamblers
- 83 Downloads
Clinical studies of problem gamblers (PGs) highlight the role of erroneous cognitions during problematic gambling, yet little is known about the role of cognitions in the maintenance of gambling problems. Twenty-nine electronic gaming machine (EGM) PGs engaged in focus groups and in-depth interviews, with a focus on understanding the relapse process in EGM gambling. Three themes and nine subthemes related to facilitatory cognitions were described; (i) creating available money (paying only essential bills, pokies money is not real money), (ii) minimising gambling as a problem (pseudo-control, ignoring harms), and (iii) struggling with overwhelming emotions. This paper expands our understanding of gambling cognitions and argues cognitions activated during problem gambling are more complicated than considered to date. These findings inform current cognitive therapy approaches by identifying a more comprehensive suite of erroneous cognitions. Addressing these cognitions may assist gamblers to maintain critical thinking about their decision to gamble, thus reducing their risk of relapse.
KeywordsProblem gambling Cognitions Harm Permission giving Justifying Cognitive therapy Qualitative
The researchers acknowledge Gambling Research Australia (GRA) who commissioned the focus group component of this study. We thank the participants who gave their time and made this research possible.
This work was supported by Gambling Research Australia (Grant No. 084/06), and a Flinders University Seeding Grant.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bar, A. (2004). Chapter 6 a qualitative evaluation of a supported housing program for homeless persons with severe mental illness. In D. Padgent (Ed.), The qualitative research experience. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
- Barton, K. R., Yazdani, Y., Ayer, N., Kalvapalle, S., Brown, S., Stapleton, J., & Harrigan, K. A. (2017). The effect of losses disguised as wins and near misses in electronic gaming machines: a systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(4), 1241–1260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cowie, M. E., Stewart, S. H., Salmon, J., Collins, P., Al-Hamdani, M., Boffo, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2017). Distorted beliefs about luck and skill and their relation to gambling problems and gambling behavior in dutch gamblers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
- Cowlishaw, S., Merkouris, S., Dowling, N., Anderson, C., Jackson, A., & Thomas, S. (2012). Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), 11.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. (2007). Australasian gambling review third edition (1992–2007). Adelaide, South Australia: Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia.Google Scholar
- Gamblers Anonymous (Ed.). (1984). Sharing recovery through gamblers anonymous. Los Angeles: Gamblers Anonymous Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Zazryn, T., Bakacs, L., & Shami, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers. Retrieved from South Australia, Adelaide.Google Scholar
- MacLaren, V. V., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2012). Gambling motives and symptoms of problem gambling in frequent slots players. Journal of Gambling Issues, 27, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J., Pols, R., Battersby, M., Lawn, S., Pulvirenti, M., & Smith, D. (2012b). A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 2: factors that ‘Pull’ the gambler away from relapse. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(3), 465–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries (Report No. 10). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, Productivity Commission Inquiry Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schellink, T., & Schrans. (2002). Atlantic Lottery Corporation video lottery responsible gaming feature research: final report. Retrieved from Halifax, Nova Scotia:Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar