Analyzing the Links Between Problematic Social Media Use, Dark Triad Traits, and Self-esteem
Social media use, which is regarded as a popular leisure activity around the world, brings about the risk of becoming problematic in its wake, and personality differences have been shown to relate with different levels of engagement in risky social media use. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of problematic social media use (PSMU) with Dark Triad (DT) traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism) and self-esteem. A total of 827 university students [495 (60%) women and 332 (40%) men, Mage = 20.36, SD = 1.47] filled out a questionnaire that included the Social Media Disorder Scale, Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Scale, and Single Item Self-esteem Scale. The direct effects of DT traits and self-esteem on PSMU and the indirect effect of narcissism on PSMU through self-esteem were investigated by applying structural equation modeling. Results indicated that, when controlling for gender and age, Machiavellianism and narcissism had small significant direct effects on PSMU, while the partial indirect link of narcissism via self-esteem was negligible. The model was able to explain 18% of the variance. Results were discussed in the light of existing literature.
KeywordsProblematic social media use Dark Triad Narcissism Machiavellianism Psychopathy Self-esteem University students
The authors are most grateful to the students who kindly participated in this study.
Role of Funding Sources
Zsolt Demetrovics was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (grant numbers: K111938, KKP126835). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of the study or the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data or the preparation, review, or approval of the article.
KK collected and analyzed the data. ZD developed the study model. ŞBT drafted the manuscript. All of the authors contributed to the final version.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the first author’s university ethics committee and was carried out in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki declaration. All of the participants have given their informed consent and participated in the study voluntarily and anonymously.
Conflict of Interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andreassen, S. C., Billieux, J., Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., Demetrovics, Z., Mazzoni, E., & Pallesen, S. (2016). The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(2), 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Király, O., Maraz, A., Elekes, Z., Griffiths, M. D., Andreassen, C. S., & Demetrovics, Z. (2017). Problematic social media use: results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169839.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: an Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmody, C. L. (2012). Internet addiction: just Facebook me! The role of social networking sites in internet addiction. Computer Technology and Application, 3(3), 262–267.Google Scholar
- Eraslan-Çapan, B., Satici, S. A., Yilmaz, M. F., Kayiş, A. R. (2015). Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Turkish adaptation study. 13. National Psychological Counselling and Guidance Conference, 7–10 October, Mersin, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
- Gültekin, G. (2015). Examining dark triad in interpersonal context: their relationship with risk-taking, self-presentation and self-conscious emotions. (Unpublished master’s thesis). İstanbul: Doğuş University: Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
- Huang, H. (2012). Social media addiction among adolescents in urban China: an examination of sociopsychological traits, uses and gratifications, academic performance, and social capital. (Doctoral thesis).Google Scholar
- Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Kircaburun, K. (2016a). Effects of gender and personality differences on twitter addiction among Turkish undergraduates. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 33–42.Google Scholar
- Kircaburun, K. (2016b). Self-esteem, daily internet use and social media addiction as predictors of depression among Turkish adolescents. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 64–72.Google Scholar
- Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. (2018). Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: the mediating role of self-liking. Journal of Behavioral Addictions., 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.15.
- Koronczai, B., Kökönyei, G., Urbán, R., Kun, B., Pápay, O., Nagygyörgy, K., et al. (2013). The mediating effect of self-esteem, depression and anxiety between satisfaction with body appearance and problematic internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39(4), 259–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowen, A. (2004). Narcissism: denial of the true self. New York: Macmillan Pub.Google Scholar
- Olowu, A. O., & Seri, F. O. (2012). A study of social network addiction among youths in Nigeria. Journal of Social Science and Policy Review, 4(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
- Statista. (2017). Social media statistics & facts. Retrieved 24 February, 2018, From https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/.
- van den Eijnden, R. J., Lemmens, J. S., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). The social media disorder scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 478–487.Google Scholar
- Young, K. (2015). The evolution of internet addiction disorder. In C. Montag & M. Reuter (Eds.), Internet addiction, studies in neuroscience, psychology, and behavioral economics (pp. 3–17). New York: Springer.Google Scholar