Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design and Methods of the New Zealand National Gambling Study, a Prospective Cohort Study of Gambling and Health: 2012–2019

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the design, sampling, recruitment, and data analysis of the prospective, nationally representative New Zealand National Gambling Study. Particular aspects of the study were critical for its success as a longitudinal epidemiologic study, making its methodology beneficial for replication in other jurisdictions. At baseline (2012), 6251 adults were interviewed and followed-up in 2013, 2014, and 2015. An additional cohort of 106 moderate-risk/problem gamblers interviewed at baseline (2014–2015) and follow-up (2015–2016) increased the number of these groups in the study. Measures included gambling commencement, gambling frequency, gambling risk levels, at-risk and problem gambling development (incidence), comorbidity, problem gambling cessation, and relapse. Future stages include a follow-up assessment in 2019 and a qualitative study. The study design enables assessment of population and individual level changes and transitions over time, identification of risk and protective factors, and comparisons with previous similarly designed prospective studies. Methods for enhancing response rates and retention are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. “Usual residents” excluded people who were present within the dwelling at the time of interview but who usually resided elsewhere.

  2. “Permanent, private dwelling” was defined as either a separate house or two or more houses or flats joined together or a flat or house joined to a business or shop, or a bach, crib, or hut (as long as they were not attached to a work camp), that were used as private dwellings.

References

  • Abbott, M.W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: a report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Report number 6 of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

  • Abbott, M. (2017). Gambling and gambling harm in New Zealand: a 28-year case study. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9767-6. [Advance online publication].

  • Abbott, M. W., & Clarke, D. (2007). Prospective problem gambling research: contribution and potential. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & McKenna, B. G. (2005). Gambling and problem gambling among recently sentenced women prisoners in New Zealand prisons. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 559–581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M.W., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research series no. 12. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Internal Affairs.

  • Abbott, M.W., & Volberg, R.A. (1992). Frequent gamblers and problem gamblers in New Zealand. Research series no. 14. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M.W., & Volberg, R.A. (2000). Taking the pulse on gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: a report on phase one of the 1999 National Prevalence Survey. Report number three of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.dia.govt.nz/pubforms.nsf/URL/TakingthePulse.pdf/$file/TakingthePulse.pdf.

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2006). The measurement of adult problem and pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., McKenna, B. G., & Giles, L. C. (2005). Gambling and problem gambling among recently sentenced male prisoners in four New Zealand prisons. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 537–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2013). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 985–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014a). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: overview and gambling participation. Report number 1. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014b). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: gambling harm and problem gambling. Report number 2. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2015a). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: attitudes towards gambling. Report number 3. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2015b). New Zealand National Gambling Study: wave 2 (2013). Report number 4. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2016a). New Zealand National Gambling Study: wave 3 (2014). Report number 5. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Stone, C. A., Billi, R., & Yeung, K. (2016b). Gambling and problem gambling in Victoria, Australia: changes over 5 years. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 47–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billi, R., Stone, C. A., Marden, P., & Yeung, K. (2014). The Victorian Gambling Study: a longitudinal study of gambling and health in Victoria, 2008–2012. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billi, R., Stone, C. A., Abbott, M., & Yeung, K. (2015). The Victorian Gambling Study (VGS) a longitudinal study of gambling and health in Victoria 2008-2012: design and methods. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(2), 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Bellringer, M., Greer, N., Kolandai-Matchett, K., Rawat, V., Langham, E., et al. (2017). Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calado, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Problem gambling worldwide: an update and systematic review of empirical research (2000–2015). Journal of Behavioural Addictions, 5(4), 592–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipperfield, J. G., Havens, B., & Doig, W. D. (1997). Method and description of the Aging in Manitoba Project: a 20-year longitudinal study. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16(4), 606–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chromy, J. R. (2008). Probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawber, T. R., Kannel, W. B., & Lyell, L. P. (1963). An approach to longitudinal studies in a community. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 22(107), 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sample frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(4), 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Internal Affairs (2007). People's participation in, and attitudes to, gambling 1985–2005: results of the 2005 survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.dia.govt.nz/Pubforms.nsf/URL/GamblingParticipationSurvey1985-2005.pdf/$file/GamblingParticipationSurvey1985-2005.pdf.

  • Department of Justice and Attorney-General (2012). Queensland household gambling survey 2011–2012. Brisbane, Australia: Department of Justice and Attorney-General. Retrieved from https://publications.qld.gov.au/storage/f/2014-06-20T02%3A38%3A40.297Z/queensland-household-gambling-survey-2011-12.pdf.

  • Devlin, M. E., & Walton, D. (2012). The prevalence of problem gambling in New Zealand as measured by the PGSI: adjusting prevalence estimates using meta-analysis. International Gambling Studies, 12(2), 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D.M., Currie, S.R., Hodgins, D.C., Schopflocher, D.P., Smith, G.J., & Williams, R.J. (2015). The leisure, lifestyle, & lifecycle project (LLLP): a longitudinal study of gambling in Alberta. Final report for the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. Retrieved from http://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/50377.

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Retrieved from http://www.ccgr.ca/sites/default/files/CPGI-Final-Report-English.pdf.

  • Hare, S. (2009). A study of gambling in Victoria: problem gambling from a public health perspective. Melbourne: Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/4027/Gambling-in-victoria-problem-gambling-from-a-public-health-perspective.pdf.

  • Kessler, R., & Mroczek, D. (1994). Final versions of our non-specific psychological distress scale. Written communication-memo dated 10/3/94. Ann Arbour: Surrey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

  • Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1998). Confidence intervals for proportions with very small expected number of positive counts estimated from survey data. Survey Methodology, 24, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0.

  • LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Stability and progression of disordered gambling: lessons from longitudinal studies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(1), 52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2006). Problem gambling in New Zealand: analysis of the 2002/03 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/problemgamblingnz-occbulletin32.pdf.

  • Ministry of Health. (2009). Problem gambling in New Zealand: analysis of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/a-focus-on-problem-gambling-results-200607-nz-health-survey.pdf.

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Conducting mixed analyses: a general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1(1), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling Report no. 50. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Public Health Agency of Sweden (2016). Gambling and gambling problems in Sweden 2008–2010: Swedish longitudinal gambling study. Swelogs findings from wave one and wave two. Östersund: Public Health Agency of Sweden.

  • R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/.

  • Rollnick, S., Heather, N., Gold, R., & Hall, W. (1992). Development of a short ‘readiness to change’ questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. British Journal of Addiction, 87(5), 743–754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romild, U., Volberg, R., & Abbott, M. (2014). The Swedish longitudinal gambling study (Swelogs): design and methods of the epidemiological (EP-) track. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(3), 372–386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rossen, F. (2015). Gambling and problem gambling: results of the 2011/12 New Zealand Health Survey. Auckland: The University of Auckland UniServices, Centre for Addiction Research.

  • Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 1(4), 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmond, C., Crampton, P., King, P., & Waldegrave, C. (2006). NZiDep: a New Zealand index of socioeconomic deprivation for individuals. Social Science and Medicine, 62(6), 1474–1485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, M., Kraus, L., & Bühringer, G. (2011). Differences in pathological gambling prevalence estimates: facts or artefacts? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(4), e83–e99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S., Muhlan, H., & Power, M. (2005). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slutske, W. S. (2007). Longitudinal studies of gambling behavior. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 127–154). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statens Folkhälsoinstitut (2012). Årsrapport Stödlinjen 2011. (A 2012:04). Retrieved from http://spelforskning.se/2013/12/13/hur-var-det-nu-med-datorspelsberoende/.

  • The Social Research Centre. (2013). Gambling prevalence in South Australia (2012). Adelaide: Department for Communities and Social Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.problemgambling.sa.gov.au/professionals/news_and_events/news-items/release-of-the-2012-gambling-prevalence-study-in-south-australia/?a=13625.

  • Tu, D. (2013). New Zealanders’ participation in gambling: results from the 2012 Health and Lifestyles Survey. Wellington: Health Promotion Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. (2011). The Victorian Gambling Study: a longitudinal study of gambling and public health—wave two findings. Melbourne: Department of Justice.

  • Volberg, R. A., & Abbott, M. W. (1994). Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 23(4), 976–983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Dickerson, M., Ladouceur, R., & Abbott, M. W. (1996). Prevalence studies and the development of services for problem gamblers and their families. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 215–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., … Dobbie, F. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey 2010. United Kingdom: National Centre for Social Research.

  • Williams, R.J., & Volberg, R.A. (2010). Best practices in the population assessment of problem gambling. Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Retrieved from https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10133/1259/2010-BP-OPGRC.pdf?sequence=1.

  • Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2014). The classification accuracy of four problem gambling assessment instruments in population research. International Gambling Studies, 14(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J., & Volberg, R.A., & Stevens, R.M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Retrieved from https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/handle/10133/3068.

  • Williams, R.J., Hann, R.G., Schopflocher, D., West, B., McLaughlin, P., White. N., ... Flexhaug, T. (2015). Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Guelph, Ontario. Retrieved from https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/handle/10133/3641.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank National Research Bureau staff who conducted the fieldwork and Dr. Stuart Mundy-McPherson for his contributions to the conduct of the study and collating information for this article.

Funding

The New Zealand Ministry of Health funded the study (Contract numbers 335667, 349827/00, and 349827).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Abbott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N. et al. Design and Methods of the New Zealand National Gambling Study, a Prospective Cohort Study of Gambling and Health: 2012–2019. Int J Ment Health Addiction 15, 1242–1269 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9843-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9843-y

Keywords

Navigation