What Behaviours and Cognitions Support Responsible Consumption of Gambling? Results from an Expert Survey
- 235 Downloads
This study analysed expert views on (1) the adequacy of the current promotion of responsible gambling, (2) the practicality and worth of developing an evidence-based set of responsible gambling consumption behaviours and cognitions and (3) the relative importance of behaviours and cognitions promoted as supporting responsible consumption of gambling. Experts (N = 107) rated the importance of 61 behaviours and cognitions, distilled from a systematic literature review and content analysis of 30 websites, and grouped into seven categories. Behaviours and cognitions considered most important for problem gamblers related to ensuring gambling is affordable, limiting persistence at gambling, and using help and support. Those for at-risk gamblers related to understanding gambling, ensuring gambling expenditure is affordable, and keeping gambling in balance. For non-problem gamblers, important behaviours and cognitions related to understanding gambling, keeping gambling in balance, and positive motivations for gambling. Current promotion of responsible gambling was considered inadequate. Efforts to develop, validate and promote evidence-based responsible gambling consumption behaviours and cognitions can build on those identified in this research.
KeywordsHarm minimisation Gambling disorder Safe gambling Responsible gambling Gambling consumption Problem gambling At-risk gambling Consumer protection
Financial support for this study was received from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. We would also like to thank the 107 experts who responded to our survey for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The first author has received funds from the following sources: Australian Research Council, the Alberta Gambling Research Institute, and the Australian Communications and Media Authority, Gambling Research Australia, Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation and the NSW, Queensland, Victorian and South Australian Governments; and has acted as a consultant on responsible gambling for the gambling industry (Echo Entertainment, Sportsbet). The second author has received funds from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Department of Queensland Justice and Attorney General, Gambling Research Australia, National Association for Gambling Studies, the Alberta Gambling Research Institute and the Australian Communications and Media Authority. He has acted as a consultant for the gambling industry for 3 years for a project on gambling by employees of Star (previously Echo) Entertainment casinos. The third author has no competing interests to declare. None of the authors has a financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored this research.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: overview and gambling participation. Report no. 1. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Informed choice and gambling: principles for consumer protection. Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2, 103–118.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. (2008). Gambling and self-regulation. Guelph, ON: University of Guelph.Google Scholar
- Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., et al. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Australasian gambling review (5th ed.). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
- Dzik, B. (2006). Between consumption and investment: a new approach to the study of the motivation to gamble. Journal of Gambling Issues, 17. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2006.17.4.
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gainsbury, S. (2010). Self-exclusion: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Hing, N. (2005). Giving the gamblers a voice: the perceived efficacy of responsible gambling practices in NSW clubs. Gambling Research, 17(1), 53–69.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Nuske, E., & Gainsbury, S. (2012). Gamblers at risk and their help-seeking behaviour. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Gainsbury, S., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Russell, A. (2014a). Interactive gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Sproston, K., Brook, K., & Brading, R. (2016, online). The structural features of sports and race betting inducements: issues for harm minimisation and consumer protection. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9642-6.
- Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (2002). Understanding and treating pathological gamblers. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Lucar, C., Wiebe, J., & Philander, K. (2013). Monetary limits tools for internet gamblers: a review of their availability, implementation and effectiveness online. Retrieved from: http://www.responsiblegambling.org/docs/research-reports/monetary-limits-tools-for-internet-gamblers.pdf?sfvrsn=8
- McDonnell-Phillips. (2006). Analysis of gambler precommitment behaviour. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- McMillen, J. (1997). When gambling is a problem: implications for public health. Consumer Rights Journal, 1(3), 10–13.Google Scholar
- Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: towards a national definition. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaPLante, D. A., Gray, H. M., & Shaffer, H. J. (2013). A benchmark study for monitoring exposure to new gambling opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Division on Addiction.Google Scholar
- Parke, A., Harris, A., Parke, J., Rigbye, J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Facilitating awareness and informed choice in gambling. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8(3), 6–20.Google Scholar
- Responsible Gambling Council (2010). Insight 2010: informed decision making. Retrieved from: http://www.responsiblegambling.org/rg-news-research/rgc-centre/insight-projects/docs/default-source/research-reports/informed-decision-making
- Saugeres, L., Thomas, A., Moore, S., & Bates, G. (2012). Gamblers tell their stories: life patterns of gambling. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schottler Consulting. (2010). Factors that influence gambler adherence to pre-commitment decisions. Retrieved from http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/home/research/gra+research+reports/factors+that+influence+a+gambler+pre-commitment+decisions+2010
- Schüll, N. D. (2012). Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sproston, K., Hanley, C., Brook, K., Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. (2015). Marketing of sports betting and racing. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: a comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar