Advertisement

Psychosocial Impact of Fracking: a Review of the Literature on the Mental Health Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing

  • Jameson K. Hirsch
  • K. Bryant Smalley
  • Emily M. Selby-Nelson
  • Jane M. Hamel-Lambert
  • Michael R. Rosmann
  • Tammy A. Barnes
  • Daniel Abrahamson
  • Scott S. Meit
  • Iva GreyWolf
  • Sarah Beckmann
  • Teresa LaFromboise
Original Article

Abstract

The process of natural gas extraction known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a controversial energy acquisition technique often viewed with disdain by the public, due to its potential for environmental harm. However, the mental health and psychological well-being of fracking communities, including potential benefits and detriments, are often overlooked. We reviewed the literature on the association between fracking and psychological functioning, finding that although persons living in fracking communities may experience some minimal, initial benefits such as land lease income or infrastructure development, they may also experience worry, anxiety, and depression about lifestyle, health, safety, and financial security, as well as exposure to neurotoxins and changes to the physical landscape. Indeed, entire communities can experience collective trauma as a result of the “boom/bust” cycle that often occurs when industries impinge on community life. Impacted communities are often already vulnerable, including poor, rural, or indigenous persons, who may continue to experience the deleterious effects of fracking for generations. An influx of workers to fracking communities often stokes fears about outsiders and crime; yet, it must be recognized that this population of mobile workers is also vulnerable, often ostracized, and without social support. Practitioners, researchers, and policy makers alike should continue to investigate the potential psychological ramifications of fracking, so that effective and targeted intervention strategies can be developed, disseminated, and implemented to improve mental health in fracking communities.

Keywords

Fracking Hydraulic fracturing Mental health Quality of life Stress Rural 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., et al. (2007). Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(sup1), S95–S98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angel, A. (2014). Beyond the "roughneck" stereotype: revealing the actual face of mobile workers in the Alberta oil sands and North Dakota's Bakken oil region and why it matters to health. White Paper, 08.14. Target Logistics. Downloaded from: http://www.targetlogistics.net/1_pdfs/white-papers/BeyondtheRoughneckStereotypeWhitePaper.pdf.
  3. Balise, V. D., Meng, C. X., Cornelius-Green, J. N., Kassotis, C. D., Kennedy, R., & Nagel, S. C. (2016). Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 106(4), 795–819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberger, M., & Oswald, R. E. (2012). Impacts of gas drilling on human and animal health. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 22(1), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brake, W., & Addo, E. (2014). Tourism and ‘fracking’ in Western Newfoundland: interests and anxieties of coastal communities and companies in the context of sustainable tourism. International Journal of Marine Science, 4(2), 16–41. doi: 10.5376/ijms.2014.04.0002.Google Scholar
  6. Brasier, K., Davis, L., Kelsey, T., McLaughlin, D., Schafft, K., Babbie, K. et al. (2014). The Marcellus shale impacts study: chronicling social and economic change in North Central and Southwest Pennsylvania. Center for Rural Pennsylvania. Retrieved from: http://www.rural.palegislature.us/documents/reports/The-Marcellus-Shale-Impacts-Study.pdf
  7. Brown, R. B., Dorins, S. F., & Krannich, R. S. (2005). The boom-bust-recovery cycle: dynamics of change in community satisfaction and social integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera, L. Y., Tesluk, J., Chakraborti, M., Matthews, R., & Illes, J. (2016). Brain matters: from environmental ethics to environmental neuroethics. Environmental Health, 15(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey, M. (2012). Coal seam gas: future bonanza or toxic legacy? Viewpoints, 8, 26–31.Google Scholar
  10. Castelli, M. (2015). Fracking and the rural poor: negative externalities, failing remedies, and federal legislation. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality, 3, 281–304.Google Scholar
  11. Cerros, H. J. (2015). From a public health perspective: fracking and other unconventional oil and gas extraction techniques in California. Retrieved from http://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/187
  12. Chapman, D. P., Perry, G. S., & Strine, T. W. (2005). The vital link between chronic disease and depressive disorders. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2(1), A14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clough, E., & Bell, D. (2016). Just fracking: a distributive environmental justice analysis of unconventional gas development in Pennsylvania, USA. Environmental Research Letters, 11(2), 025001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colborn, T., Schultz, K., Herrick, L., & Kwiatkowski, C. (2014). An exploratory study of air quality near natural gas operations. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 20(1), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connor, L. R. (2013). Justified by faith: the upper Susquehanna Lutheran synod and the Pennsylvania natural gas fracking controversy. Retrieved from http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/83/
  16. Coram, A., Moss, J., & Blashki, G. (2014). Harms unknown: health uncertainties cast doubt on the role of unconventional gas in Australia’s energy future. The Medical Journal of Australia, 4, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowe, J., Silva, T., Ceresola, R. G., Buday, A., & Leonard, C. (2015). Differences in public perceptions and leaders’ perceptions on hydraulic fracturing and shale development. Sociological Perspectives, 58(3), 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drummond, V., & Grubert, E. (2017). Fault lines: seismicity and the fracturing of energy narratives in Oklahoma. Energy Research & Social Science. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.039.
  19. England, J. L., & Albrecht, S. L. (1984). Boomtowns and social disruption. Rural Sociology, 49(2), 230–246.Google Scholar
  20. Evensen, D., & Stedman, R. (2015). Fracking: promoter and destroyer of the good life. Journal of Rural Studies. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.020.
  21. Ewen, C., Borchardt, D., Richter, S., & Hammerbach, R. (2012). Hydrofracking risk assessment: Study concerning the safety and environmental comparability of hydrofracking for natural gas production from unconventional reservoirs (Executive Summary). Berlin: Exxon Mobil.Google Scholar
  22. Ferrar, K. J., Kriesky, J., Christen, C. L., Marshall, L. P., Malone, S. L., Sharma, R. K., et al. (2013). Assessment and longitudinal analysis of health impacts and stressors perceived to result from unconventional shale gas development in the Marcellus shale region. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 19(2), 104–112. doi: 10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrari, K. D. (2013). Rural communities: how do individuals perceive change when industry enters the area? Available from graduate theses and dissertations. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4813
  24. Filteau, M. R. (2015). Go back to Texas, gas bastards! How a newcomer population of itinerant energy workers manage dirty work stigma in the Marcellus shale region. Society & Natural Resources, 28(11), 1153–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garvie, K. H., & Shaw, K. (2015). Shale gas development and community response: perspectives from Treaty 8 territory, British Columbia. Local Environment, 21(8), 1009-1028. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2015.1063043.
  26. Haggerty, J., & McBride, K. (2016). Does local monitoring empower fracking host communities? A case study from the gas fields of Wyoming. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Illes, J., Davidson, J., & Matthews, R. (2014). Environmental neuroethics: changing the environment—changing the brain. Recommendations submitted to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 1(2), 221–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacquet, J. B. (2014). Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15), 8321–8333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacquet, J. B., & Kay, D. L. (2014). The unconventional boomtown: updating the impact model to fit new spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 9(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  30. Jaspal, R., Turner, A., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking on YouTube: exploring risks, benefits and human values. Environmental Values, 23(5), 501–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jemielita, T., Gerton, G. L., Neidell, M., Chillrud, S., Yan, B., Stute, M., et al. (2015). Unconventional gas and oil drilling is associated with increased hospital utilization rates. PloS One, 10(7), e0131093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Korfmacher, K. S., Jones, W. A., Malone, S. L., & Vinci, L. F. (2013). Public health and high volume hydraulic fracturing. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 23(1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lai, P.-H., Lyons, K. D., Gudergan, S. P., & Grimstad, S. (2017). Understanding the psychological impact of unconventional gas developments in affected communities. Energy Policy, 101, 492–501. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Maguire, K., & Winters, J. V. (2016). Energy boom and gloom? Local effects of oil and natural gas drilling on subjective well-being (9811). Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2750294
  36. Mauro, I., MacGregor, M., & Wheeler, D. (2014). Discussion paper: the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing in Nova Scotia—a public participatory risk assessment. Retrieved from: http://nlhfrp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Discussion-Paper-Environment-Impacts.pdf
  37. McCoy, D., & Saunders, P. (2016). Health and fracking: the impacts and opportunity costs. Medact. Retrieved from: http://www.medact.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/medact_fracking-report_WEB4.pdf
  38. McDermott-Levy, R., & Garcia, V. (2016). Health concerns of northeastern Pennsylvania residents living in an unconventional oil and gas development county. Public Health Nursing, 33(6), 502–510. doi: 10.1111/phn.12265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McDermott-Levy, R., Kaktins, N., & Sattler, B. (2013). Fracking, the environment, and health. American Journal of Nursing, 113(6), 45–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McKenzie, L. M., Witter, R. Z., Newman, L. S., & Adgate, J. L. (2012). Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources. Science of the Total Environment, 424, 79–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Measham, T. G., Fleming, D. A., & Schandl, H. (2016). A conceptual model of the socioeconomic impacts of unconventional fossil fuel extraction. Global Environmental Change, 36, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Minor, J. (2014). Local government fracking regulation: a Colorado case study. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 61(1), 62.Google Scholar
  43. Moore, M. (2013). The independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW (human health and environment effects). Public Health Association of Australia. Downloaded from: https://www.phaa.net.au/documents/item/400.
  44. Morgan, M. I., Hine, D. W., Bhullar, N., Dunstan, D. A., & Bartik, W. (2016). Fracked: coal seam gas extraction and farmers’ mental health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morrone, M., Chadwick, A. E., & Kruse, N. (2015). A community divided: hydraulic fracturing in rural Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies, 21(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moss, J., Coram, A., & Blashki, G. (2016). Is fracking good for your health? An analysis of the impacts of unconventional gas on health and climate (Technical Report 28). Retrieved from: http://www.tai.org.au/content/fracking-good-your-health.
  47. Paylor, A. (2017). The social-economic impact of shale gas extraction: a global perspective. Third World Quarterly, 38(2), 340–355. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1153420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perry, S. L. (2012). Development, land use, and collective trauma: the Marcellus shale gas boom in rural Pennsylvania. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 34(1), 81–92. doi: 10.1111/j.2153-9561.2012.01066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perry, S. L. (2013). Using ethnography to monitor the community health implications of onshore unconventional oil and gas developments: examples from Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 23(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powers, M., Saberi, P., Pepino, R., Strupp, E., Bugos, E., & Cannuscio, C. C. (2015). Popular epidemiology and fracking: citizens’ concerns regarding the economic, environmental, health and social impacts of unconventional natural gas drilling operations. Journal of Community Health, 40(3), 534–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Redmond, H., & Faulkner, K. (2013). Submission on the Camden gas project stage 3 northern expansion. Doctors for the Environment Australia. Downloaded from: https://www.dea.org.au/images/uploads/submissions/Camden_Gas_Project_Stage_3_Submission_01-13.pdf.
  52. Resick, L. K., Knestrick, J. M., Counts, M. M., & Pizzuto, L. K. (2013). The meaning of health among mid-Appalachian women within the context of the environment. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(3), 290–296. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0119-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruddell, R., Jayasundara, D. S., Mayzer, R., & Heitkamp, T. (2014). Drilling down: an examination of the boom-crime relationship in resource-based boom countries. Criminology, Crim.Just.L & Soc'y, 15, 3.Google Scholar
  54. Saberi, P. (2013). Navigating medical issues in shale territory. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 23(1), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saberi, P., Propert, K. J., Powers, M., Emmett, E., & Green-McKenzie, J. (2014). Field survey of health perception and complaints of Pennsylvania residents in the Marcellus shale region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(6), 6517–6527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Sangaramoorthy, T., Jamison, A. M., Boyle, M. D., Payne-Sturges, D. C., Sapkota, A., Milton, D. K., et al. (2016). Place-based perceptions of the impacts of fracking along the Marcellus shale. Social Science & Medicine, 151, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Short, D., & Szolucha, A. (2017). Fracking Lancashire: the planning process, social harm and collective trauma. Geoforum. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.001.
  58. Steinzor, N., Subra, W., & Sumi, L. (2013). Investigating links between shale gas development and health impacts through a community survey project in Pennsylvania. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 23(1), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szolucha, A. (2016). The human dimensions of shale gas development in Lancashire, UK: toward a social impact assessment. Retrieved from: http://repowerdemocracy.net/report
  60. Tosh, J., & Gislason, M. (2016). Fracking is a feminist issue: an intersectional ecofeminist commentary on natural resource extraction and rape. Psychology of Women Section Review, 1–12.Google Scholar
  61. Tucker, C. (2012). Health concerns of fracking drawing increased attention: EPA conducting studies on health effects. The Nation's Health, 42(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  62. Vaneckova, P., & Bambrick, H. (2014). Approaches to baseline studies of human health in relation to industries with potential environmental impact. Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney. Downloaded from: http://www.chiefscientist.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/56894/140903_Human-CSG_completed_report.pdf.
  63. Ward, H., Eykelbosh, A., & Nicol, A. M. (2016). Addressing uncertainty in public health risks due to hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Health Review, 59(2), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watterson, A., & Dinan, W. (2015). Health impact assessments, regulation, and the unconventional gas industry in the UK: exploiting resources, ideology, and expertise? New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 25(4), 480-512. doi: 10.1177/1048291115615074.
  65. Weber, B. A., Geigle, J., & Barkdull, C. (2014). Rural North Dakota’s oil boom and its impact on social services. Social Work, 59(1), 62–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Werner, A. K., Vink, S., Watt, K., & Jagals, P. (2015). Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence. Science of the Total Environment, 505, 1127–1141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wheeler, D., MacGregor, M., Atherton, F., Christmas, K., Dalton, S., Dusseault, M., et al. (2015). Hydraulic fracturing: integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits. Energy Policy, 85, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Witter, R. Z., Stinson, K., Sackett, H., Putter, S., Kinney, G., Teitelbaum, D. et al. (2008). Potential exposure-related human health effects of oil and gas development: A white paper. Colorado School of Public Health. Downloaded from: https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/hea_08091702a.pdf.
  69. Witter, R. Z., McKenzie, L., Towle, M., Stinson, K., Scott, K., Newman, L. et al. (2010). Health impact assessment for Battlement Mesa, Garfield County Colorado. Colorado School of Public Health. Downloaded from: https://www.garfield-county.com/environmental-health/battlement-mesa-health-impact-assessment-draft2.aspx.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jameson K. Hirsch
    • 1
  • K. Bryant Smalley
    • 2
  • Emily M. Selby-Nelson
    • 3
  • Jane M. Hamel-Lambert
    • 4
  • Michael R. Rosmann
    • 5
  • Tammy A. Barnes
    • 6
  • Daniel Abrahamson
    • 6
  • Scott S. Meit
    • 7
  • Iva GreyWolf
    • 8
  • Sarah Beckmann
    • 9
  • Teresa LaFromboise
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  3. 3.Cabin Creek Health SystemsCharlestonUSA
  4. 4.Department of PediatricsNationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  5. 5.Department of Occupational and Environmental HealthUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  6. 6.American Psychological AssociationWashingtonUSA
  7. 7.Central Arkansas Veterans Health SystemLittle RockUSA
  8. 8.The Society of Indian PsychologistsAlbanyUSA
  9. 9.Yakima Valley Farm Workers ClinicToppenishUSA
  10. 10.Department of Developmental and Psychological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations