Negative Wins Do Not Reinforce ‘Short-Term’ Slot Machine Gambling Intensity, Game Evaluation, and Gambling Beliefs
Negative wins refer to wins smaller than the original stake on a bet. Previous studies including large numbers of mandatory trials have shown that negative wins reinforce gambling intensity. We conducted an experimental investigation of the effect of negative wins on slot machine gambling intensity, game evaluation, and gambling beliefs based on a small number of mandatory trials/games. Participants were 92 (females = 57) undergraduate students (age range = 19 to 31, mean = 21.6, years) randomized to either an experimental (n = 43) or control (n = 49) group. They were instructed to play for a minimum of 50 trials and were each allocated 500 credits for placing bets. Participants in the experimental group were each exposed to a 30% negative win condition whereas the control group participants had no such exposure. All participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing demographic and gambling variables. In contrast to our hypotheses, the groups did not differ significantly on total bet size, mandatory phase (first 50 trials) bet size, number of bets placed after the mandatory phase, bet size variation, and remaining credits after the mandatory phase. Our findings indicate that with a small number of mandatory trials, negative wins do not reinforce gambling intensity, game evaluation, and gambling beliefs.
KeywordsBetting Gambling Losses disguised as wins Negative wins Slot machines
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The project received ethical approval from the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Western Norway (2013/119/REK). All procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Participants completed and returned informed consent forms prior to participation in the study.
- Dymond, S., Lawrence, N. S., Dunkley, B. T., Yuen, K. S., Hinton, E. C., Dixon, M. R., et al. (2014). Almost winning: Induced MEG theta power in insula and orbitofrontal cortex increases during gambling near-misses and is associated with BOLD signal and gambling severity. NeuroImage, 91, 210–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Zazryn, T., Bakacs, L., & Shami, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers. Adelaide, South Australia: Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia.Google Scholar
- Lyons, C. A. (2006). Methodological considerations in the experimental analysis of gambling. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. R. Wilson (Eds.), Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 91–104). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In D. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 211–243). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Rossen, F. V., Clark, T., Denny, S. J., Fleming, T. M., Peiris-John, R., Robinson, E., & Lucassen, M. F. (2016). Unhealthy gambling amongst New Zealand secondary school students: An exploration of risk and protective factors. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14, 95–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sagoe, D., Pallesen, S., Hanss, D., Leino, T., Molde, H., Mentzoni, R. A., & Torsheim, T. (2017). The relationships between mental health symptoms and gambling behavior in the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00478.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Walker, M. (2004). The seductiveness of poker machines. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 16, 52–66.Google Scholar