The Role of Family in Residential Treatment Patient Retention
- 397 Downloads
This study aims to examine the completion rate of individuals in a residential addiction center when the individual’s family members or significant others participate in the therapeutic process, contrasted with those who have no family participation. Data was analyzed from 274 patients enrolled in a residential addiction treatment program. These patients were divided into two groups, one having had family participation during treatment, the other having no family participation. These groups were analyzed for successful program completion across various characteristics. Outcome analysis reported a 9.62 % increased program completion rate for those with a family member or significant other involved in a seven-day family program.
KeywordsFamily Addiction Treatment Outcome Completion
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Carson McPherson, Holly Boyne, and Dr. Robert Willis declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Statement of Human Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- American Society of Addiction Medicine. (2011). Definition of addiction. Retrieved from http://www.asam.org/quality-practice/definition-of-addiction.
- Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. (2005). Substance abuse in Canada: current challenges and choices. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Lee, M. T., Horgan, C. M., Garnick, D. W., Acevedo, A., Panas, L., Ritter, G. A.,… & Reynolds, M. (2014). A performance measure for continuity of care after detoxification: relationship with outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 47(2), 130–139.Google Scholar
- McCrady, B. S., & Epstein, E. E. (1999). Addictions: a comprehensive guidebook: a comprehensive guidebook (illustrat ed.). GB: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Meis, L. A., Griffin, J. M., Greer, N., Jensen, A. C., MacDonald, R., Carlyle, M., … Wilt, T. J. (2013). Couple and family involvement in adult mental health treatment: a systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 275–286.Google Scholar
- Sharma, M. K., & Lal, R. (2007). Treatment retention factors amongst substance users. Indian Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine, 38(1–2), 75–79.Google Scholar
- Szapocznik, J., Perez-Vidal, A., Brickman, A. L., Foote, F. H., Santisteban, D., Hervis, O., & Kurtines, W. M. (1988). Engaging adolescent drug abusers and their families in treatment: a strategic structural systems approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verweij, K. J., Zietsch, B. P., Lynskey, M. T., Medland, S. E., Neale, M. C., Martin, N. G., … & Vink, J. M. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on cannabis use initiation and problematic use: a meta‐analysis of twin studies. Addiction, 105(3), 417–430.Google Scholar
- Walls, R. T., Moore, L. C., Batiste, L. C., & Loy, B. (2009). Vocational rehabilitation and job accommodations for individuals with substance abuse disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 75(4), 35–44.Google Scholar