Creativity and Psychoactive Substance Use: A Systematic Review

  • Fruzsina Iszáj
  • Mark D. Griffiths
  • Zsolt Demetrovics
Original Article

Abstract

The role of psychoactive substance use in the research of artistic creation and creativity is a long-standing topic. Ever since the discovery of LSD, researchers have examined the relationship between the effects of chemical substances and the artistic creative process. The goal of the present study was to systematically review all published empirical publications and case reports in refereed journals that focus on the relationship between psychoactive substances and creativity/creative artistic process. A total of 19 studies were identified that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results were difficult to summarize because of the different study questions asked, the diverse methods used, the different samples applied, and the various substances examined. The general results suggest that there is an association between creativity and substance use. However, the studies were unable to show that substance use directly contributed to the growth of creativity or facilitated creative artistic process. It is concluded that specific skills may be subject to change as a consequence of substance use, and consequently may have an effect on the style of creation.

Keywords

Artistic process Creativity Psychoactive substance use Drugs Empirical research Systematic review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Grant numbers: K111938).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any interests that could constitute a real, potential or apparent conflict of interest with respect to their involvement in the publication. The authors also declare that they do not have any financial or other relations (e.g. directorship, consultancy or speaker fee) with companies, trade associations, unions or groups (including civic associations and public interest groups) that may gain or lose financially from the results or conclusions in the study. Sources of funding are acknowledged.

References

  1. Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1931). Study of Values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Barron, F., & Welsh, G. S. (1987). Barron-Welsh Art Scale. Menlo Park: Mind Garden Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Belli, S. (2009). A psychobiographic alanalysis of Brian Douglas Wilson: creativity, drugs, and models of schizophrenic and affective disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 809–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2005) Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, P. R., Memfield, P. R., & Guilford, J. P. (1958). Consequences. Beverly Hills: Sheridan.Google Scholar
  6. de Rios Dobkin, M., & Janiger, O. (2003). LSD, spirituality, and the creative process. Rochester: Park Street Press.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. (1993). Creative abilities of adolescent substance abusers. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 46, 52–60.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrenzweig, A. (1970). The hidden order of art. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  9. Fink, A., Slamar-Halbedl, M., Unterrainer, H. F., & Weiss, E. M. (2012). Creativity: genius, madness, or a combination of both? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, R., & Scheib, J. (1971). Creative performance and the hallucinogenic drug-induced creative experience or one man’s brain-damage is another’s creativity. Confinia Psychiatrica, 14, 174–202.Google Scholar
  11. Forgeard, M. J. C., & Elstein, J. G. (2014). Advancing the clinical science of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Frecska, E., Móré Cs, E., Vargha, A., & Luna, L. E. (2012). Enhancement of creative expression and entoptic phenomena as after-effects of repeated ayahuasca ceremonies. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 44, 191–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1398–1405.Google Scholar
  14. Gough, H. G. & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1963). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harman, W. W., McKim, R. H., Mogar, R. E., Fadiman, J., & Stolaroff, M. J. (1966). Psychedelic agents in creative problem-solving: a pilot study. Psychological Reports, 19, 211–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holm-Hadulla, R. M., & Bertolino, A. (2014). Creativity, alcohol and drug abuse: the pop icon Jim Morrison. Psychopathology, 47, 167–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Iszáj, F., & Demetrovics, Z. (2011). Balancing between sensitization and repression: the role of opium in the life and art of Edgar Allan Poe and Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Substance Use and Misuse, 46, 1613–1618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, M. T. (2007). The creativity of crumb: research on the effects of psychedelic drugs on the comic art of Robert Crumb. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 39, 283–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, K. A., Blagrove, M., & Parrott, A. C. (2009). Cannabis and ecstasy/ MDMA: empirical measures of creativity in recreational users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(4), 323–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jung, C. G. (1971). Über das phänomen des geistes in kunst und wissenschaft. Olten: Walter-Verlag AG.Google Scholar
  22. Kerr, B., Shaffer, J., Chambers, C., & Hallowell, K. (1991). Substance use of creatively talented adults. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(2), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khantzian, E. J. (2003). Understanding addictive vulnerability: An evolving psychodynamic perspective. Neuropsychoanalysis, 5(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  24. Knafo, D. (2008). The senses grow skilled in their craving: thoughts on creativity and addiction. Psychoanalytic Review, 95, 571–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Korngold, M. (1963). LSD and the creative experience. Psychoanalytic Review, 50, 682–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kris, E. (1939). On inspiration. Preliminary notes on emotional conditions in creative states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 20, 377–389.Google Scholar
  27. Kris, E. (1962). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  28. Landon, M., & Fischer, R. (1970). On similar linguistic structures in creative performance and psilocybin-induced experience. Confinia Psychiatrica, 13, 115–38.Google Scholar
  29. Lawshe, C. H., & Harris, D. H. (1960). Purdue Creativity Test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.Google Scholar
  30. Lowe, G. (1995). Judgements of substance use and creativity in’ordinary’ people’s everyday lifestyles. Psychological Reports, 76, 1147–1154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maslow, A. H. (2011). Toward a psychology of being. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Fine Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner’s manual, remote associates test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, D. R. (1955). Subject of object visualization. Monterey: California Test Bureau.Google Scholar
  34. Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 436.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters, E. R., Joseph, S. A., & Garety, P. A. (1999). The measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population: introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25, 553–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Plucker, J. A., McNeely, A., & Morgan, C. (2009). Controlled substance-related beliefs and use: relationships to undergraduates’ creative personality traits. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(2), 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preti, A., & Vellante, M. (2007). Creativity and psychopathology. Higher rates of psychosis proneness and nonright-handedness among creative artists compared to same age and gender peers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(10), 837–845.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Richards, W. A. & Berendes, M. (1977–78). LSD-assisted psychotherapy and dynamics of creativity: a case report. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 3(2), 131–146.Google Scholar
  39. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  40. Schafer, G., Feilding, A., Morgan, C. J. A., Agathangelou, M., Freeman, T. P., & Curran, H. V. (2012). Investigating the interaction between schizotypy, divergent thinking and cannabis use. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 292–298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005) Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  43. Steffenhagen, R. A., McCann, H. G., & McAree, C. P. (1976). Personality and drug use: a study of the usefulness of the Mf Scale of the MMPI in measuring creativity and drug use. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 21(3), 8–16.Google Scholar
  44. Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 871–889.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 469–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychology and Addiction, Institute of PsychologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations