Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research on Drug Use: Scoping Review and Case Example from Brazil
- 450 Downloads
This paper examines the use of vignettes, a research method used to explore sensitive issues in studies on drug use. First aim, to explore available literature on the use of vignettes in examining the phenomenon of drug use; Second, to illustrate the actual use of a vignette to capture the experiences of teachers in a school setting in Brazil. This we propose to do by applying Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review technique. Twenty-six qualitative studies were found that met the reviews inclusion and exclusion criteria. Across studies, the vignette technique as a method of data collection was applied in different aspects of drug use (education and training, ethics in research, identification of risk, HIV, prevention, public conceptions, religion, rape, social policy, treatment). The main reasons to use this method were related, but not limited to the sensitive area of drug use, to stimulate discussion, to get participants involved, and to maintain confidentiality. In nursing practice, vignettes can make it easier to the patient to address drug use’s topics in group and individually. With the use of the vignette technique, qualitative researchers can increase the possibility of discussion about drug use with the participants, based on their choices and reflection on the scenario.
KeywordsAddiction Qualitative methodology Vignette technique Scoping review Substance Abuse School and education
We acknowledge Nasim Haque and Nida Mustafa for their contributions and English edits. We would also like to thank the Sao Paulo Research Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil, which supported this research.
This study was financially supported by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil with PhD scholarship (ref. nr. 2012/21109-8) and Research Internships Abroad scholarship (ref. nr. 2013/22187-5).
Conflict of Interest
The authors of this manuscript, J. Macedo, N. Khanlou and M. Luis, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human research (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.
- Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D., Humphreys, K., Obot, I., et al. (2010). Drug policy and the public good (p. 352). Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
- Carlini, E. A., Noto, A. N., Sanchez, Z. V. M., et al. (2010). VI Levantamento Nacional sobre o Consumo de Drogas Psicotrópicas entre Estudantes do Ensino Fundamental e Médio das Redes Pública e Privada de Ensino nas 27 Capitais Brasileiras – 2010. São Paulo: CEBRID, UNIFESP, SENAD.Google Scholar
- CICAD. (2010). Report on Drug Use in the Americas. Report, OAS/OEA.Google Scholar
- Fischer, J., Neale, J., Bloor, M., & Jenkins, N. (2008). Conflict and user involvement in drug misuse treatment decision-making: a qualitative study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3(21), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Fisher, C. B., Oransky, M., Mahadevan, M., Singer, M., Mirhej, G., & Hodge, D. (2008). Marginalized populations and drug addiction research: realism, mistrust, and misconception. IRB Ethics & Human Research, 30(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Macedo, J.Q., & Luis M.A.V. (2015). Participatory methodology with educators: preventing the consumption of psychoactive drugs in schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto. Google Scholar
- UNODC. (2011). World Drug Report 2011. Report, United Nations.Google Scholar
- UNODC. (2013). World Drug Report 2013. Report, United Nations.Google Scholar
- UNODC. (2014). Information about drugs. Available at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/illicit-drugs/definitions/ (accessed: 9 May 2014).