Advertisement

Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Adolescent Problem Gambling: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Canadian Teachers

  • Rayna M. Sansanwal
  • Jeffrey L. Derevensky
  • Izabela Ramona Lupu
  • Viorel Lupu
Article

Abstract

Despite legislative statutes, international research suggests that youth engage in regulated and unregulated forms of gambling. The current study was designed as a cross-cultural, comparative analysis to assess teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding adolescent gambling and other high-risk behaviours. One-hundred and ninety-four teachers from two regions of Romania, with experience teaching secondary school students, completed an online survey. Results were compared to an existing study looking at the same aspects among three-hundred and ninety Canadian teachers. Results suggest that both Romanian and Canadian teachers are knowledgeable about the proportion of underage youth that participate in gambling activities. Despite this awareness, Romanian teachers perceive gambling as a more serious issue affecting youth and recognize the negative consequences of underage gambling more than Canadian teachers. This is consistent with prevention initiatives, as more Romanian than Canadian teachers believe it is the responsibility of school staff to prevent adolescent gambling and are more open to receiving prevention training in youth gambling. Although international differences were found, gambling, relative to other high-risk adolescent behaviours, remains disregarded as serious problem behaviour. These results suggest that greater strides need to be taken towards increasing international teacher training and education about the short and long-term consequences associated with adolescent problem gambling.

Keywords

Teachers Attitudes Adolescents Problem gambling Canada Romania 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

Rayna M. Sansanwal, Jeffrey L. Derevensky, Izabela Ramona Lupu and Viorel Lupu declare that they have no conflict of interest.Rayna M. Sansanwal, Jeffrey L. Derevensky, Izabela Ramona Lupu and Viorel Lupu have not received a research grant from any of the aforementioned affiliated institutions nor have they received an honorarium associated with this research.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.’

References

  1. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Productivity Commission (2010). Gambling productivity commission inquiry report. Australian Government.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, C., Derevensky, J., Meerkamper, E., & Cutajar, J. (2011). Parents’ perceptions of adolescent gambling: a Canadian national study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 25, 36–53.Google Scholar
  4. Delfabbro, P., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of youth gambling in South Australian adolescents. J Adolesc, 26(3), 313–330.Google Scholar
  5. Derevensky, J. (2012). Teen gambling: understanding a growing epidemic. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Derevensky, J. L., Shek, D. T., & Merrick, J. (2011). Youth gambling: the hidden addiction. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derevensky, J. L., St-Pierre, R. A., Temcheff, C. E., & Gupta, R. (2013). Teacher awareness and attitudes regarding adolescent risky behaviours: Is adolescent gambling perceived to be a problem? Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Dickson, L., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2008). Youth gambling problems: examining risk and protective factors. International Gambling Studies, 8(1), 25–47.Google Scholar
  9. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241.Google Scholar
  10. Ghergut, A. (2010). Analysis of inclusive education in Romania. results from a survey conducted among teachers. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 5, 711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossman, J. B., Chan, C. S., Schwartz, S. E., & Rhodes, J. E. (2012). The test of time in school-based mentoring: the role of relationship duration and re-matching on academic outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1–2), 43–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1996). The relationship between gambling and video-game playing behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), 375–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: an analysis of long term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2–3), 119–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lupu, I. R., & Lupu, V. (2013). Gambling prevention program for teenagers. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13, 575–584.Google Scholar
  15. Lupu, V., & Todirita, I. R. (2013). Updates of the prevalence of problem gambling in Romanian teenagers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(1), 29–36.Google Scholar
  16. Magoon, M. E., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2006). Parental modeling, attachment and supervision as moderators of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Shead, N. W., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2010). Risk and protective factors associated with youth problem gambling. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 22(1), 39–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shead, N. W., Derevensky, J. L., & Meerkamper, E. (2011). Your mother should know: a comparison of maternal and paternal attitudes and behaviours related to gambling among their adolescent children. Int J Ment Health Addict, 9(3), 264–275.Google Scholar
  19. Todirita, I. R., & Lupu, V. (2013). Gambling prevention program among children. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(1), 161–169.Google Scholar
  20. Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1292–1305.Google Scholar
  21. Volberg, R., Gupta, R., Griffiths, M. D., Olason, D., & Delfabbro, P. (2010). An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 22(1), 3–38.Google Scholar
  22. Walther, B., Hanewinkel, R., & Morgenstern, M. (2013). Short-term effects of a school-based program on gambling prevention in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(5), 599–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wood, R. T., Gupta, R., Derevensky, J. L., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Video game playing and gambling in adolescents: common risk factors. J Child Adolesc Subst Abus, 14(1), 77–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rayna M. Sansanwal
    • 1
  • Jeffrey L. Derevensky
    • 1
  • Izabela Ramona Lupu
    • 2
  • Viorel Lupu
    • 3
  1. 1.International Centre for Youth Gambling Problems and High Risk BehaviorsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBabes-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations