Advertisement

Internet Addiction, Temperament, and the Moderator Role of Family Emotional Involvement

  • Ugo PaceEmail author
  • Carla Zappulla
  • Giovanni Guzzo
  • Rosanna Di Maggio
  • Chiara Laudani
  • Marco Cacioppo
Article

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between internet addiction, temperament, and family functioning focusing on the unique and common contribution that temperament and family functioning made to internet addiction. A total of 320 adolescents (164 boys and 156 girls), from 15 to 17 years (M = 16.06, SD = 0.59), completed measures of internet addiction, temperament, and family functioning. Data showed that salience, as the ability of internet to change negatively person’s life, was predicted positively by temperament linked to lack of control and by the perception of low level of familial emotional involvement. Results also revealed that family affective involvement played a moderating role in the relationship between temperamental lack of control and salience of internet, such that both at lower and higher levels of lack of control, internet salience tended to be lower when family affective involvement was high and to be higher when family affective involvement was low.

Keywords

Temperament Lack of control Internet addiction Family emotional involvement 

References

  1. Agrawal, A., & Lynskey, M. T. (2008). Are there genetic influences on addiction: evidence from family, adoption, and twin studies. Addiction, 103, 1069–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). DSM-IV-TR diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder, fourth edition, text revision. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, J. E. (1987). Temperament in infancy. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 1101–1149). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Belsky, J. (1997). Variation in susceptibility to environmental influence: an evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Block, J. J. (2008). Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 306–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caspi, A., Henry, B., McGee, R. O., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1995). Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: from age three to age fifteen. Child Development, 66, 55–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, S. C., Kim, J. W., Kim, B. N., Lee, J. H., & Kim, E. H. (2008). Biogenetic temperament and character profiles and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in Korean adolescents with problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, 735–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Maggio, R., & Zappulla, C. (2013). Mothering, fathering, and Italian adolescents’ problem behaviors and life satisfaction: dimensional and typological approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9721-6.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frences, A. (2013). Saving Normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, Big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. William Morrow PublisherGoogle Scholar
  13. Guzzo, G., Lo Cascio, V., & Pace, U. (2013). The role of individual and relational characteristics on alcohol consumption among Italian adolescents: a discriminant function analysis. Child Indicators Research, 6, 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ha, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Bae, S. C., Bae, S., Kim, H., Sim, M., et al. (2007). Depression and internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology, 40, 424–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmbeck, G. N. (2002). Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Lonigro, A., Capacchione, G., & Baumgartner, E. (2012). Family functioning and binge drinking among Italian adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 1132–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, M.-S., & Jung, I.-K. (2012). Comparisons of temperament and character between problematic internet users and problematic drug users in Korean adolescents. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, M. S., Hong, S. D., & Joung, Y. S. (2007). Characteristics of temperament and character properties in adolescents with internet addiction tendency. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatry Association, 46, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, Y. S., Han, D. H., Yang, K. C., Daniels, M. A., Na, C., Kee, B. S., et al. (2008). Depression like characteristics of 5HTTLPR polymorphism and temperament in excessive internet users. Journal of Affective Disorders, 109, 165–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lengua, L. J. (2006). Growth in temperament and parenting as predictors of adjustment during children’s transition to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 42, 819–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liddle, H. A. (2010). Treating adolescent substance abuse using multidimensional family therapy. In J. Weisz & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lo Cascio, V., Guzzo, G., Pace, F., & Pace, U. (2013). Anxiety and self-esteem as mediators of the relation between family communication and indecisiveness in adolescence. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 13, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L., Cox, E., Young, E., & Christakis, D. A. (2011). Problematic internet use among US youth: a systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 165, 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pace, U., & Zappulla, C. (2010). Relations between suicidal ideation, depression, and emotional autonomy from parents in adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pace, U., & Zappulla, C. (2013). Detachment from parents, problem behaviors, and the moderating role of parental support among Italian adolescents. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park, S. K., Kim, J. Y., & Cho, C. B. (2008). Prevalence of internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence, 43, 895–909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pies, R. (2009). Should DSM-V designate “internet addiction” a mental disorder? Psychiatry, 6, 31–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roncone, R., Rossi, L., Muiere, E., Matteucci, M., Giacomelli, R., Tonietti, G., et al. (1998). The Italian version of the family assessment device. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 451–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire—Short Form (ATQ-SF). Retrieved Genuary 17, 2013, from http://www.bowdoin.edu/~sputnam/rothbart-temperamentquestionnaires.
  30. Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–86). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Rothbart, M. K., & Rueda, M. R. (2005). The development of effortful control. In U. Mayr, E. Awh, & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Developing individuality in the human brain: A tribute to Michael I. Posner (pp. 167–188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: a comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behaviour and Personality, 37, 1017–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruggieri, S., & Boca, S. (2013). At the roots of product placement: the mere exposure effect. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 37–49.Google Scholar
  35. Rutter, M. (2007). Psychopathological development across adolescence. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanson, A., Hemphill, S. A., & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: a review. Social Development, 13, 142–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schimmenti, A., & Caretti, V. (2010). Psychic retreats or psychic pits? Unbearable states of mind and technological addiction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schimmenti, A., Guglielmucci, F., Barbasio, C., & Granieri, A. (2012). Attachment disorganization and dissociation in virtual worlds: a study on problematic Internet use among players of online role-playing games. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9(2), 195–202.Google Scholar
  39. Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1994). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. (Revised edition). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
  40. Tichon, J. G., & Shapiro, M. (2003). The process of sharing social support in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Spijkerman, R., Vermulst, A., Van Rooij, T. J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2010). Compulsive internet use among adolescents: bidirectional parentchild relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 77–89.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van der Vorst, H., Engels, R. C. M. E., Meeus, W., Dekovic, M., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2005). The role of alcohol-specific socialization in adolescents’ drinking behaviour. Addiction, 100, 1464–1476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Rooij, A. J., & Van den Eijnden, R. J. (2007). Monitor internet en Jongeren 2006 en 2007: Ontwikkelingen in internetgebruik en de rol van opvoeding. Rotterdam: Reeks.Google Scholar
  44. Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2001). Parental efficacy and delinquent behavior: do control and support matter? Criminology, 39, 677–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yap, M. B. H., Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. (2007). Using an emotion regulation framework to understand the role of temperament and family processes in risk for adolescent depressive disorders. Clinical Child and Family Psychology, 10, 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. C., Chen, S. H., & Ko, C. H. (2007). Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, K. S. (2009). Internet addiction: diagnosis and treatment considerations. Journal Contemporany Psychotherapy, 39, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ugo Pace
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carla Zappulla
    • 3
  • Giovanni Guzzo
    • 2
  • Rosanna Di Maggio
    • 3
  • Chiara Laudani
    • 2
  • Marco Cacioppo
    • 2
  1. 1.Università Kore di Enna (UKE), Cittadella UniversitariaEnnaItaly
  2. 2.Università Kore di Enna (UKE)EnnaItaly
  3. 3.University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations