The Victorian Gambling Screen: Validity and Reliability in an Adolescent Population

  • B. Tolchard
  • P. Delfabbro


Although many attempts have been made to assess problem or pathological gambling in adolescents, concerns have been raised about whether existing measures are ideally suited for this purpose. Such measures are heavily influenced by traditional addiction models common to the study of substance use. In contrast, more recent public health approaches to gambling place a greater emphasis on the role of behavior and its harmful consequences and this is implicit in many currently accepted definitions of problem gambling. This paper reports on the use of one such measure (Victorian Gambling Screen -VGS), with 926 grade 7–12 adolescents surveyed in the Australian Capital Territory. The VGS was shown to correlate well with the gold standard Diagnostic & Statistical Manual-IV-Juvenile Screen (DSM-IV-J) for problem gamblers producing similar prevalence estimates. The measure also has sound internal reliability and concurrent validity. The findings suggest that harm-based measures such as the VGS are credible with adolescent populations in Australia and that various forms of harm observed in adult populations can also be observed in adolescent problem gamblers.


Adolescence Measurement Problem gambling Australia Addiction 


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Tovim, D., Esterman, A., Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. (2001). The Victorian Gambling Screen: project report. Adelaide: Flinders Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Galli, S., & Primi, C. (2012). The Suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen–Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a Screening Tool: IRT-Based Evidence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1037/a0029987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Delfabbro, P., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of youth gambling in South Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 313–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delfabbro P., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2005) Adolescent Gambling in the ACT: Report to the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission. Canberra, Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  6. Delfabbro, P., Lahn, L., & Grabosky, P. (2006). Psychosocial correlates of problem gambling in Australian students. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 587–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2000). Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: A comparison of the SOGS-RA and the GA 20 questions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 227–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Winters, K. (2003). Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: Are the current rates inflated? Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 405–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodder, R. A., & Astle, D. J. (1980). A methodological analysis of Srole’s nine-item anomia scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 329–334.Google Scholar
  10. Dowling, N.A., Jackson, A.C., Thomas, S.A., & Frydenburg, E. (2010). Children at Risk of Developing Problem Gambling. Report to Gambling Research Australia in fulfilment of Tender 103/06, May 2010.Google Scholar
  11. Eack, S. M., Greeno, C. G., & Lee, B.-J. (2006). Limitations of the Patient Health Questionnaire in identifying anxiety and depression in community mental health: many cases are undetected. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher, S. (1992). Measuring pathological gambling in children: The case of fruit machines in the U.K. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, S. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research, 7, 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, S. (2000). Developing the DSM-IV-DSM-IV criteria to identify adolescent problem gambling in non-clinical populations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 253–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambino, B. (2011). The Validation of Screening Tests: Meet the New Screen same as the Old Screen? Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9285-6.Google Scholar
  16. Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). GHQ: A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  17. Hardoon, K.K., Derevensky, J.L., & Gupta, R. (2002). An Examination of the influence of familial, emotional, conduct, and cognitive pProblems, and yyperactivity upon youth risk-taking and aAdolescent gambling problems: Report to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre: R & G Child Development Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neill, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: towards a national definition, Report prepared for the National Gambling Research Program Working Party, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  20. Pelletier, A., Ladouceur, R., Fortin, J.-M., & Ferland, F. (2004). Assessment of high school students’ understanding of DSM-IV-MR-J items. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poulin, C. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 67–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Productivity Commission. ( 2010), Gambling. Report no. 50, Canberra.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stinchfield, R. (2010). A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments. International Journal of Adolescent Medical Health, 22(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  26. Streiner, D., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales. In A pracitcal guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Tiggemann, M., & Winefield, A. H. (1984). The effects of unemployment on the mood, self-esteem, locus of control, and depressive affect of school-leavers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. (2010). The Victorian Gambling Screen: Reliability and validation in a clinical population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 623–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tremblay, J., Wiebe, J., Stinchfield, R., & Wynne, H. (2010). The Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory: Phase III final report. Toronto: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and the Interprovincial Consortium on Gambling Research.Google Scholar
  30. Vachon, J., Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., & Tremblay, R. E. (2004). Adolescent gambling: Relationships with parent gambling and parenting practices. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 398–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weiss, D. J., & Yoes, M. E. (1991). Item response theory. In R. K. Hambleton & J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and applications (pp. 69–95). New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Winters, K., Stinchfield, R., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HealthUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations