All in the Family: Help-Seeking by Significant Others of Problem Gamblers
- 784 Downloads
Problem gambling can significantly affect the lives of concerned significant others (CSOs) of problem gamblers, especially family members, but little is known about their help-seeking activities and experiences. This paper explores help-seeking by CSOs of problem gamblers and their related motivators and barriers. A telephone interview was administered to 48 CSOs who called an Australian gambling helpline seeking assistance for themselves and/or a person with gambling problems. Key motivators for seeking help (through helplines, non-professional sources, and self-help measures) were concerns the gambling might become a major problem, negative emotions, problems maintaining normal daily activities, concerns for dependents’ welfare, and health concerns. Barriers included wanting to solve the problem on their own, and shame. Findings highlight the need to better equip CSOs to assist both the person with gambling problems towards treatment and recovery and to protect their own physical, emotional, social and financial wellbeing.
KeywordsFamily Significant others Problem gambling Help-seeking
Financial assistance for this research was received from Gambling Research Australia. The authors would also like to thank the research participants and all the Gambling Helplines in Australia for assistance with recruiting them.
- Abbott, D. A., Cramer, S. L., & Sherrets, S. D. (1995). Pathological gambling and the family-practice implications. Families in Society, 76(4), 213–219.Google Scholar
- Anderson, S., Dobbie, F., & Reith, G. (2009). Recovery from problem gambling: A qualitative study. Edinburgh: Scottish Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Bellringer, M., Pulford, J., Abbott, M., DeSouza, R., & Clarke, D. (2008). Problem gambling – Barriers to help seeking behaviours. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. (2009). Australasian gaming review: Fourth edition (1992-2008). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
- Dickson-Swift, V. A., James, E. L., & Kippen, S. (2005). The experiences of living with a problem gambler: Spouses and partners speak out. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2005.13.6.
- DiClemente, C. C. (2003). Addiction and change: How addictions develop and addicted people recover. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, L., & Delfabbro, L. (2003). Perceptions of service efficacy and individual differences in help-seeking strategies amongst South Australian problem gamblers. Gambling Research, 15(2), 44–57.Google Scholar
- Hodgins, D. C., Makarchuk, K., el-Guebaly, N., & Peden, N. (2001). Why problem gamblers quit: a comparison of methods and samples. Addiction Research and Theory, 10(2), 203–218.Google Scholar
- Kalischuk, R. G. (2010). Cocreating life pathways: problem gambling and its impacts on families. The Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 18(1), 7–17.Google Scholar
- McMillen, J., Marshall, D., Murphy, L., Lorenzen, S., & Waugh, B. (2004). Help-seeking by problem gamblers, friends & families: A focus on gender and cultural groups. Canberra: ACT Gambling & Racing Commission.Google Scholar
- Patford, J. L. (2008). For poorer: how men experience, understand and respond to problematic aspects of a partner’s gambling. Gambling Research, 19(1&2), 7–20.Google Scholar
- Petry, N., & Weiss, M. (2009). Social support is associated with gambling treatment outcomes in pathological gamblers. American Journal of Addiction, 18(5), 402–408.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Florida: Kreiger.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar