Advertisement

Practice Makes Poorer: Practice Gambling Modes and Their Effects on Real-Play in Simulated Roulette

  • Jana Bednarz
  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Daniel King
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the role of free-play modes on gambling behaviour in computer-based roulette. Eighty participants were randomly allocated to one of four pre-exposure conditions: no exposure (control group), a loss condition, a break-even and a profit condition in which the return to player was greater than 100 %. Behavioural persistence and betting behaviour was subsequently monitored in a period of regular roulette play. The results showed that players given opportunities for free-play sessions bet significantly more per spin and wagered more credits in total than the control group, although no significant group differences in behavioural persistence were observed. The results suggest that the role of free-play modes, as they commonly appear on some Internet gaming sites, may need to be investigated further because of their potential role in altering player perceptions of the activity and their influence on risk-taking behaviour.

Keywords

Online gambling Practice modes Risk-taking Persistence Roulette 

References

  1. Benassi, V. A., Sweeney, P. D., & Drevno, G. E. (1979). Mind over matter: perceived success at psychokinesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1377–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., Walker, L. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the reconfiguration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling. Sydney: University of Sydney: Gambling Research Unit.Google Scholar
  3. Bouts, P., & Van Avermaet, E. (1992). Drawing familiar or unfamiliar cards: stimulus familiarity, chance orientation, and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, C., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1976). Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 135–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger, J. M., & Schnerring, D. A. (1982). The effects of desire for control and extrinsic rewards on the illusion of control and gambling. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delfabbro, P., Falzon, K., & Ingram, T. (2005). The effects of parameter variations in electronic gambling simulations: results of a laboratory-based pilot study. Gambling Research, 17, 7–25.Google Scholar
  7. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: User’s manual. Toronto: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  8. Flora, S. R., & Pavlik, W. B. (1990). Conventional and reversed partial reinforcement effects in human operant responding. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 429–432.Google Scholar
  9. Gainsbury, S. (2011). Exploring the opportunities and impacts of internet gambling. International Gambling Studies, 11, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, M. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M. (2005). Does gambling advertising contribute to problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3, 15–25.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: an online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2010). Adolescent gambling on the internet: a review. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 22, 59–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: the case of gambling, videogame playing, and the internet. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 199–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. (2007). Adolescent internet gambling: preliminary results of a national survey. Education and Health, 25, 23–27.Google Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: a survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. [Article]. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ipsos MORI. (2009). British survey of children, the national lottery and gambling 2008–09: Report of a quantitative survey. London: National Lottery Commision.Google Scholar
  20. Ipsos MORI, Forrest, D. K., McHale, I., Parke, J. (2009). British survey of young people and gambling 2008–2009. Report prepared for the National Lottery Commission, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  21. Johansson, A., & Gotestam, K. G. (2004). Problems with computer games without monetary reward: similarity to pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 95, 641–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 171–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2010). The convergence of gambling and digital media: implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 175–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Derevensky, J. L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). A review of Australian classification practices for commercial video games featuring simulated gambling. International Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2012.661444.
  25. Ladouceur, R., Mayrand, M., & Tourigny, Y. (1987). Risk-taking behavior in gamblers and non-gamblers during prolonged exposure. Journal of Gambling Studies, 3, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinez, F., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Hoskens, J. (2009). Active involvement, not illusory control, increases risk taking in a gambling game. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1063–1071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. May, R. K., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., & Steenbergh, T. A. (2005). Gambling-related irrational beliefs in the maintenance and modification of gambling behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 5, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behavior in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monaghan, S., Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2009). Consequences of winning: the role of gambling outcomes in the development of irrational belief. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 49–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oldman, D. (1974). Chance and skill: a study of roulette. Sociology, 8, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Parameters for safer gambling behavior: examining the empirical research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 519–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Potenza, M. N., Wareham, J. D., Steinberg, M. A., Rugle, L., Cavallo, D. A., Krishnan-Sarin, S., & Desai, R. A. (2011). Correlates of at-risk/problem internet gambling in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 150–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. (50). Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
  36. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sevigny, S., Cloutier, M., Pelletier, M. F., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Internet gambling: misleading payout rates during the demo period. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, S. C., Armstrong, W., & Thomas, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 143–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 1593–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 253–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsitsika, A., Critselis, E., Janikian, M., Kormas, G., & Kafetzis, D. A. (2011). Association between internet gambling and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 389–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: evidence from the British gambling prevalence study 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’s sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood, W. S., & Clapham, M. M. (2005). Development of the drake beliefs about chance inventory. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 411–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling: prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final report prepared for the Ontario problem gambling research centre. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Wood, R., Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. [Article]. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood, R., Williams, R. J., & Lawton, P. K. (2007). Why do internet gamblers prefer online versus land-based venues? Some preliminary findings and implications. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 235–252.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideSouth Australia

Personalised recommendations