Advertisement

Electronic Interests and Behaviours Associated with Gambling Problems

  • James G. Phillips
  • Rowan P. Ogeil
  • Alex Blaszczynski
Article

Abstract

Multiple computing devices continue to develop capabilities that support online gambling, resulting in the need to evaluate the extent that this trend will contribute to gambling problems. A sample of 1,141 participants completed an online survey assessing interest in and difficulties limiting use of digital services. Questionnaire items measured a range of behaviours associated with electronic service use (e.g., surfing, complaints). Results indicated that individuals utilising digital services and experiencing problems limiting their TV and Mobile phone usage were more likely to report gambling problems. These respondents were more likely to click on gambling-related links, report receiving larger amounts of spam, make more attempts to unsubscribe, and to click on links to counselling sites. Exposure and interest in electronic modes of communication can be associated with a greater risk of gambling related problems.

Keywords

Problem gambling Internet Mobile phones Television Gambling Spam 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding support from Gambling Research Australia (Tender No 119/06).

References

  1. Abbott, M. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research, 18, 7–38.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research Series No 12. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, L., Phillips, J. G., & Saling, L. L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53, 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billieux, J., Van Der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1195–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Informed choice and gambling: principles for consumer protection. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2, 103–118.Google Scholar
  8. Cotte, J., & Latour, K. A. (2009). Blackjack in the kitchen: understanding online versus casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 35, 742–758.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, B. (2007). iCare: integrating responsible gaming into casino operation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delfabbro, P. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of a limited reduction in electronic gaming machine availability on perceived gambling behaviour and objective expenditure. International Gambling Studies, 8, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delfabbro, P., Osborn, A., Nevile, M., Skelt, L., & McMillen, J. (2007). Identifying problem gamblers in gambling venues. Report commissioned for the Ministerial Council on Gambling, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: theory and application. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Eadington, W. R. (1988). Loophole legalization: the process of the spread of commercial gambling without popular or legislative intent. In M. Dickerson (Ed.), 200-up (pp. 1–12). Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
  14. Eadington, W. R. (2004). The future of online gambling in the United States and elsewhere. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23, 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: user manual. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Available at: www.ccsa.ca.
  16. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2003). Comorbidity of impulse control disorders in pathological gamblers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108, 203–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: issues, concerns and recommendations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffiths, M. (2007a). Interactive television quizzes as gambling: a cause for concern? Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, M. (2007b). Mobile phone gambling. In D. Taniar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile computing and commerce (pp. 553–556). Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths, M. D. (2010). Crime and gambling: a brief overview of gambling fraud on the Internet. Internet Journal of Criminology. Accessed via: http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Griffiths_%20Gambling_Fraud_Jan_2010.pdf.
  22. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of Internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 312–320.Google Scholar
  23. Griffiths, M. D., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: an online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths, M. D., & Whitty, M. W. (2010). Online behavioural tracking in Internet gambling research: ethical and methodological issues. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 104–117.Google Scholar
  25. Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: an overview of psychosocial impacts. Gambling Research and Review Journal, 27, 27–39.Google Scholar
  26. Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2008). Socio-demographic correlates of Internet gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Report prepared for the Gambling Commission, Retrieved October 31, 2008, from: www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/UploadDocs/publications/Document/Internet%20Gambling%20secondary%20analysis.pdf.
  27. Griffiths, M. D., Wardle, J., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Socio-demographic correlates of internet gambling: findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobs, D. F. (1988). Evidence for a common dissociative-like reaction among addicts. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The convergence of gambling and digital media: implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 175–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: a prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: a prospective longitudinal study of actual Internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18, 410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LaPlante, D. A., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Population trends in Internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lund, I. (2008). The population mean and the proportion of frequent gamblers: is the theory of total consumption valid for gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2008). Internet gambling behavior in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMullan, J., & Rege, A. (2007). Cyberextortion at online gambling sites: criminal organization and online challenges. Gaming Law Review, 11, 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Monaghan, S. (2009). Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: the theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mottram, A. J., & Fleming, M. J. (2009). Extraversion, impulsivity, and online group membership as predictors of problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parke, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Why Internet gambling prohibition will ultimately fail. Gambling Law Review, 8, 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips, J. G., & Ogeil, R. P. (2011). Decisional styles and risk of problem drinking or gambling. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips, J. G., Butt, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Personality and self reported use of mobile phones for games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R. P., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Human factors determining consumer response to recommenders. In E. P. Mann (Ed.), Advertising: types, trends and controversies. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  42. Phillips, J. G., Saling, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2008). The psychology of mobile phone use and misuse. In A. C. Harper & R. V. Buress (Eds.), Mobile telephones: networks, applications, and performance (pp. 191–210). New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  43. Productivity Commission (2010). Gambling: public inquiry. Accessed via http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling-2009 on 7/9/10.
  44. Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004). Identifying problem gamblers at the gambling venue: finding combinations of high confidence indicators. Gambling Research, 16, 8–24.Google Scholar
  45. Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2006). The successful loyalty data based model to identify problem and at risk gamblers in casinos: issues and implications. Paper presented at the 16th conference of the National Association of Gambling Studies, 22nd–25th November, Sydney.Google Scholar
  46. Scoolidge, P. J. (2006). Gambling blindfolded: the case for a regulated domain for gambling sites. Gaming Law Review, 10, 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sévigny, S., Cloutier, M., Pelletier, M.-F., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Internet gambling: misleading payout rates during the “demo” period. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., & LaPlante, D. (2004a). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., LaBrie, R. A., Kidman, R. C., Donato, A. N., & Stanton, M. V. (2004b). Toward a syndrome model of addiction: multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaffer, H. J., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & LaBrie, R. A. (2010). Toward a paradigm shift in Internet gambling research: from opinion and self-report to actual behavior. Addiction Research and Theory, 18, 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: an exploratory study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: a critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2007). Problem gambling on the Internet: implications for Internet gambling policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9, 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2009). Internet gambling: prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  57. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: methodological issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wynne, H. J. (2002). Introducing the Canadian problem gambling index. Edmonton: Wynne Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Phillips
    • 1
  • Rowan P. Ogeil
    • 1
  • Alex Blaszczynski
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Psychology & PsychiatryMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations