Abstract
The popularity of poker (and in particular online poker) has increasingly grown worldwide in recent years. This increase in the popularity of poker has led to the increased incidence of the ‘professional poker player’. However, very little empirical research has been carried out into this relatively new group of gamblers. The aim was to determine how professional poker players are able to make a living from playing poker and what differentiates them from recreational poker players. This research comprised a grounded theory study involving the analysis of data from three professional poker players, one semi-professional poker player and five recreational poker players. Using a process of open coding, focused coding and theoretical sampling, in addition to constant comparison of the data, a number of themes and categories emerged. The central theme as to what distinguishes professional poker players from recreational players was that professional poker players were much more disciplined in their gambling behaviour. They treated their poker playing as work, and as such were more likely to be logical and controlled in their behaviour, took less risks, and were less likely to chase losses. Recreational players were more likely to engage in chasing behaviour, showed signs of lack of control, took more risks, and engaged in gambling while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Also of importance was the number of games and time spent playing online. Recreational players only played one or two games at a time, whereas professional poker players were much more likely to engage in multi-table poker online, and played longer sessions, thus increasing the potential amount of winnings. Playing poker for a living is very possible for a minority of players but it takes a combination of talent, dedication, patience, discipline and disposition to succeed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). Chasing in gambling behaviour: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097–1111.
Brunson, D. (2003). Super system: A course in power poker (3rd ed.). Las Vegas: Cardoza.
Burns. K. (2004). Heads-up face-off: On style and skill in the game of poker. In Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music and Design: Papers from the 2004 Fall Symposium, pp 15–22, Menlo Park, California, 2004. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.
Croson, R., Fishman, P., & Pope, D. G. (2008). Poker superstars: skill or luck? Similarities between golf—thought to be a game of skill—and poker. Chance, 21(4), 25–28.
Dedonno, M. A., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). Poker is a skill. Gaming Law Review, 12, 31–36.
Dreef, M., Borm, P., & van der Genugten, B. (2003). Measuring skill in games: several approaches discussed. Mathematical methods of operations Research, 59(3), 375–391.
Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Griffiths, M. (2003). Problem gambling. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 16, 582–584.
Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: an overview of psychosocial impacts. Gaming Research and Review Journal, 27(1), 27–39.
Griffiths, M., Parke, J., Wood, R.., Rigbye, J. (2009). Online poker gambling in University students: Further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.
Hardy, T. W. (2006). A minute to learn and a lifetime to master: implications of the poker craze for college campuses. New directions for student services, 113, 33–41.
Hayano, D. M. (1984). The professional gambler: fame, fortune and failure. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474, 157–167.
Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Foard, N. (2009). A critical introduction to social research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications.
Heubeck, S. (2008). Measuring skill in games: a critical review of methodologies. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 12(3), 231.
Hilger, M. (2008). Playing too many starting poker hands. Located at http://www.readybetgo.com/poker/strategy/starting-poker-hands-1612.html (Last accessed 22 March 2010).
Kelly, J. M., Dhar, Z., & Verbiest, T. (2007). Poker and the law: is it a game of skill or chance and legally does it matter? Gaming Law Review, 11, 190–202.
King, N. Jr. (2007). Harvard ponders just what it takes to excel at poker. The Wall Street Journal, May 3, p.14.
Larkey, P., Kadane, J., Austin, R., & Zamir, S. (1997). Skill in games. Management Science, 43, 596–609.
Lee, J. (2004). Prize and risk-taking strategy in tournaments: evidence from professional poker players. The Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion Paper No. 1345. 1–23.
Lesieur, H. R. (1979). The compulsive gambler’s spiral of options and involvement. Psychiatry, 42, 79–87.
Lesieur, H. R., & Custer, R. L. (1984). Pathological gambling: roots, phases and treatment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474, 146–156.
Multi-table (2010). Located at http://www.aintluck.com/strategy/online/multi-table/ (Last accessed 23 March 2010).
Parke, A., Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2005). Can playing poker be good for you? Poker as a transferable skill. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. Located at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue14/jgi_14_parke.html (Last accessed 10 February 2010).
Poker Pages (2010). Poker tournament results. Located at: http://www.pokerpages.com/tournament/result20307.htm (Last accessed 19 March 2010).
Rugle, L. (2004). Chasing—It’s not just about the money: Clinical reflections. Journal of Gambling Issues, 10. Located at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue10/ejgi_10_rugle.html (Last accessed 10 February 2010).
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 354–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCormack, A., Griffiths, M.D. What Differentiates Professional Poker Players from Recreational Poker Players? A Qualitative Interview Study. Int J Ment Health Addiction 10, 243–257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-011-9312-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-011-9312-y
Keywords
- Poker
- Gambling
- Professional poker
- Skill