Client Engagement Characteristics Associated with Problem Gambling Treatment Outcomes
- 336 Downloads
Previous research examining the factors associated with problem gambling treatment outcomes has examined client factors and to date, treatment characteristics, therapist factors, and client-therapist interactions have essentially remained unexplored. This study aimed to investigate how client engagement variables (client-rated therapeutic alliance, therapist-rated therapeutic alliance, number of sessions attended, and client commitment) relate to treatment outcomes (gambling and general functioning) in a sample of 475 treatment-seeking problem gambling clients using a series of hierarchical regression analyses. Client-rated therapeutic alliance predicted both gambling and general functioning outcomes, but therapist-rated therapeutic alliance only predicted general functioning outcomes. There was no significant relationship between number of sessions and outcomes, but client commitment predicted gambling outcomes. Client satisfaction only mediated the relationships between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes. Taken together, the findings indicate that client engagement characteristics, in particular the therapeutic relationship, are active agents of change in psychological interventions for problem gambling.
KeywordsGambling Problem gambling Therapeutic relationship Therapeutic alliance Treatment characteristics Treatment outcome
ND was responsible for literature review, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. SC was responsible for project design, data collection, and manuscript preparation. The authors would like to thank the staff and clients of the Gamblers Help Southern Problem Gambling Counselling Program for their participation in this project.
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- Dowling, N. (2009). Client characteristics associated with treatment attrition and outcome in female pathological gambling. Addiction Research and Theory, 17(2)Google Scholar
- Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., Thomason, N., Borrell, J., Crisp, B. R., Ho, W., et al. (2002). Longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of problem gambling counselling services, community education strategies and information products—Volume 2: Counselling interventions. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
- Luborsky, L., Barber, J. P., Siqueland, L., Johnson, S., Najavits, L. M., Frank, A., et al. (1996). The revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAI-II). Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 5(3), 260–270.Google Scholar
- Miller, S., Duncan, B., Johnson, L., & Hubbell, M. (2000). Toward an outcome informed therapeutic practice. Psychotherapy in Australia, 6(2), 30–36.Google Scholar
- Orlinksy, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy: Noch einmal. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (4th ed., pp. 270–376). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (Eds.). (2005). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar