Advertisement

Social Facilitation in Online and Offline Gambling: A Pilot Study

  • Tom Cole
  • Douglas J. K. Barrett
  • Mark D. Griffiths
Article

Abstract

To date, there has been relatively little research on Internet gambling. Furthermore, there have been few studies comparing the behaviour of Internet gamblers versus non-Internet gamblers. Using the game of roulette, this study experimentally examined (a) the differences in gambling behaviour between online and offline gamblers, and (b) the role social facilitation in gambling behaviour between online and offline gamblers. A total of 38 participants played online and offline roulette either alone or alongside another gambling participant, and the players’ chip placement and amount bet was recorded. The study found that those who gambled in online roulette placed more chips per bet and made riskier bets than those who gambled on roulette offline. The study also found that those who gambled alongside another gambler placed more chips and made riskier bets than those who gambled alone. Those who gambled online and in the presence of others, placed the highest number of chips per bet and made the riskiest bets.

Keywords

Gambling Online gambling Internet gambling Social facilitation Problem gambling 

References

  1. Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Tolerance in gambling: an objective measure using the psychophysiological analysis of male fruit machine gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 365–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffiths M. D. (2001). Internet gambling: preliminary results of the first UK prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Issues 5: Available at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/griffiths_article.html (Last accessed January 4, 2009).
  3. Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 312–320.Google Scholar
  5. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2003). The environmental psychology of gambling. In G. Reith (Ed.), Gambling: Who wins? Who Loses? (pp. 277–292). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  6. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Betting on the couch: a thematic analysis of Internet gambling using case studies. Social Psychological Review, 9(2), 29–36.Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths, M. D., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: an online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: an overview of psychosocial impacts. Gaming Research and Review Journal, 27(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths, M. D., Wardle, J., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Socio-demographic correlates of internet gambling: findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardoon, K. K., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). Social influences involved in children’s gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 191–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: a focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 76–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). South oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: challenges, prevention, and interventions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Mullen, B., Bryant, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1997). Presence of others and arousal: an integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rockloff M. J. (2008). Crowd size impacts on gaming intensity: The moderating effect of social facilitation on EGM betting behaviour. Paper presented at National Association for Gambling Studies Annual Conference, Adelaide. December.Google Scholar
  16. Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sproston, K., Erens, B., & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain, results from the British gambling prevalence survey. London: National Centre For Social Research.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). Internet Gambling: a comprehensive review and synthesis of the literature. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Cole
    • 1
  • Douglas J. K. Barrett
    • 2
  • Mark D. Griffiths
    • 1
  1. 1.International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Division, School of Social SciencesNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations