Limited Cash Flow on Slot Machines: Effects of Prohibition of Note Acceptors on Adolescent Gambling Behaviour
This study addresses the impact of prohibition of note acceptors on gambling behaviour and gambling problems among Norwegian adolescents. Data comprised school surveys at three time points; 2004 and 2005 (before intervention) and 2006 (after intervention). Net samples comprised 20.000 students aged 13–19 years at each data collection. Identical measures of gambling behaviour (gambling frequency and expenditures on slot machines) and indicators of problem gambling (SOGS-RA and Lie/Bet) were assessed at all three time points. No significant changes in gambling behaviour and problem gambling were observed in the period prior to the intervention, whereas slot machine gambling frequency was reduced by 20%, the proportion that gambled frequently on slot machines was reduced by 26%; overall gambling frequency was reduced by 10% and the proportion of problem gamblers (SOGS-RA 4+) was reduced by 20% after the intervention when controlling for potential confounders. It is suggested that these findings can be attributed to the removal of the note acceptors on slot machines.
KeywordsAdolescent gambling Slot machine Problem gambling Prevention Prevalence Note acceptors Norway
- Australian Productivity Commission (APC) (1999). Australias Gambling Industries. Report No. 10. Canberra: Ausinfo.Google Scholar
- Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, F., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the configuration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimization strategies for problem gambling. (A report for the Gaming Industry Operators’s Group). Sydney: The University of Sydney Gambling Research Unit.Google Scholar
- Brodie, M., Honeyfield, N., & Whitehead, G. (2003). Change in bank note acceptors on electronic gaming machines in Queensland — Outcome evaluation. Research and Community Engagement Division; Queensland Office of Gaming Regulation.Google Scholar
- Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2004). Gambling problems in youth: Developmental and applied perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R. M., & Nora, R. M. (1988). The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychological Reports, 83(3 Part 2), 1219–1224.Google Scholar
- Lund, I., & Nordlund, S. (2002). Pengespill og pengespillproblemer i Norge. Rapport nr. 2/2003. SIRUS.Google Scholar
- McMillen, J., Marshall, L., & Murphy, L. (2004). The use of ATMs in ACT gaming venues: An empirical study. ANU Centre for Gambling Research.Google Scholar
- Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system. In R. F. Baumeister, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation; research, theory and applications (pp. 99–129). New York: The Guilford.Google Scholar
- Norwegian Gaming Authority (2006). Annual report. Førde, Norway. Retrieved Dec. 19 2008 from: http://www.lottstift.no/eway/default.aspx?pid = 236&trg = visliste_5998&MainPaige_5482 = 5609:0:8,1573&visliste_5998 = 6122:0:8,1575.
- Norwegian Gaming Authority (2007). Annual report. Førde, Norway. Retrieved Dec. 19 2008 from: http://www.lottstift.no/eway/default.aspx?pid = 236&trg = visliste_5998&MainPaige_5482 = 5609:0:8,1573&visliste_5998 = 6122:0:8,1575.
- Palmeri, C. (2003). Hit the jackpot? You won’t need a bucket. Business weekly only. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_13/b3826076.htm.
- Pape, H., Storvoll, E. E., & Rossow, I. (2007). Report of study methodology for the school surveys 2004, 2005 and 2006 for evaluation of the Regional project carried out by the Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.sirus.no/files/pub/370/metoderapport_engelsk_regionprosj.pdf.
- Rossow, I., & Hansen, M. (2003). Underholdning med bismak—Ungdom og pengespill. (Entertainment with a tang—Adolescent gambling). Report nr. 1–03. NOVA, Oslo.Google Scholar
- Rossow, I., & Molde, H. (2006). Chasing the criteria: Comparing SOGS-RA and The Lie Bet screen to assess prevalence of problem gambling an ‘at-risk’ gambling among adolescents. Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue 18. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue18/pdfs/rossow.pdf.
- Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.Google Scholar
- Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Coughlan, M-J., Enersen, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Structural changes to electronic gaming machines as effective harm minimization strategies for non-problem and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 503–520. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-5560-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 11. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: www.camh.net/egambling/issue11.