Advertisement

The Use of Social Marketing to Influence the Development of Problem Gambling in the UK: Implications for Public Health

  • Jane E. Powell
  • Alan J. Tapp
Article

Abstract

In this paper the authors present and debate the theoretical case for the use of social marketing to help reduce problem gambling in the public health context of the UK. Is triangulated between the key theories and principles of social marketing, the key literature and its theoretical application to the debate about reducing problem gambling in the UK. The distinctions between social marketing and health education are outlined. Exchange theory, relationship marketing, and consumer focus and insight are vital to work with the public health implications of problem gambling. Social marketing may have something to offer problem gamblers, professionals in public health and policymakers. However, the self interest of the problem gambler should strongly guide intervention programmes. Such programmes should be designed with the ideal of building relationships such that long term behaviour change is effected.

Keywords

Social marketing Gambling UK Public health 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV). (4th ed, Text Revised). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen, A. (2000). Ethics in social marketing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bland, R. C., Newman, S. C., Orn, H., & Stebelsky, G. (1993). Epidemiology of pathological gambling in Edmonton. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 108–112.Google Scholar
  4. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines are they the crack-cocaine of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gamcare. (2008). The dangers of problem gambling. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from http://www.gamcare.org.uk/.
  6. Grun, L., & McKeigue, P. (2000). Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after the introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction, 95(6), 959–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hastings, G. (2007). Social Marketing: Why should the devil have all the best tunes?. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Hicks, J. (2001). The strategy behind Florida's “truth” campaign. Tobacco Control, 10, 3–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howat, P., Maycock, B., & Slevin, T. (2005). Community health advocacy to prevent social and health problems associated with gambling—a case study. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 11(1), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korn, D., Murray, M., Morrison, M., Reynolds, J., & Skinner, H. (2006). Engaging youth about gambling using the internet: The YouthBet.net website. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(6), 448–453.Google Scholar
  11. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKee, M., & Sassi, F. (1995). Gambling with the nation’s health? British Medical Journal, 311, 521–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Najavits, L., Grymala, L., & George, B. (2003). Can advertising increase awareness of problem gambling? A statewide survey of impact. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(4), 324–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Orford, J. (2005). Disabling the public interest: gambling strategies and policies for Britain. Addiction, 100, 1219–1225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poulin, C. (2006). Gambling. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175(10), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perese, L., Bellringer, M., & Abbott, M. (2005). Literature review to inform social marketing objectives and approaches and behaviour change indicators to prevent and minimize gambling harm. Auckland: AUT Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  17. Rothschild, M. (1999). Carrots, sticks, and promises: a conceptual framework for the management of public health and social issue behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose, G. (1992). The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rothschild, M., Mastin, B., & Miller, T. (2006). Reducing alcohol-impaired driving crashes through the use of social marketing. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(6), 1218–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teo, P., Mythily, S., Anantha, S., & Winslow, M. (2007). Demographic and clinical features of 150 pathological gamblers referred to a community addictions programme. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 36(3), 165–168.Google Scholar
  22. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84(2), 237–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., & Piggott, S. (2007). The British gambling prevalence survey 2007. London: National Centre for Social Research for the Gambling Commission UK.Google Scholar
  24. Whyte, K. S. (1999). Analysis of the national gambling impact study commission act. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 309–318.Google Scholar
  25. Wiebe, G. D. (1952). Merchandising commodities and citizenship on television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(3), 443–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wynne, H. (2003). Introducing the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Alberta: Wynne Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West Of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations