Advertisement

Gambling Awareness for Youth: An Analysis of the “Don’t Gamble Away our Future” Program

  • Lisa M. Taylor
  • Pamela Hillyard
Article

Abstract

Gambling has become increasingly popular among minors and is easily accessible to them. This is alarming since research has indicated that minors are more susceptible to gambling pathology than adults. Additionally, gambling has devastating effects on minors that gamble as well as their families and communities. The Illinois Institute for Addiction Recovery (IIAR) developed a gambling awareness prevention program called “Dont Gamble Away our Future ” to educate minors about gambling and the dangers associated with it. The IIAR started collecting data for the purpose of evaluation in 2005. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the program’s effectiveness at changing knowledge about gambling and to assess the frequencies of problem and pathological gambling among participants at program implementation (year one). The program was evaluated with a sample of 8,455 Midwestern youth. Findings indicated that 10% of the participants were probable pathological gamblers and that the program was successful at increasing knowledge of gambling and the negative effects it can have, over the short term. Teaching minors about the risks of gambling and the effects it can have is an important preventative measure that can help protect youth from the dangers associated with problem and pathological gambling.

Keywords

Youth gambling Addictions Prevention programs Program evaluation Consequences of gambling 

References

  1. Adlaf, E. M, Paglia-Boak, A., Beitchman, J. H., Wolf, D. (2006). The mental health and well- being of Ontario students 1991–2005. Centre for addition and mental health research document series, No. 18. Retrieved September 22, 2008 from http://www.camh.net/Research/Areas_of_research/Population_Life_Course_Studies/OSDUS/OSDUS2005_mental_detailed_fnl.pdf
  2. American Psychological Association (1998, August 20). Pathological gambling more prevalent among youths than adults, study finds. Science Daily. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/08/980820075118.htm
  3. Atherton, J. S. (2005). Learning and teaching: Piaget’s developmental theory. Retrieved May 19, 2008, from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/piaget.htm
  4. Buchta, R. M. (1995). Gambling among adolescents. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 34, 346–348. doi: 10.1177/000992289503400701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delfabbro, P., Lahn, J., Grabosky, P. (2005). Adolescent gambling in the ACT. Report to the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://www.gamblingandracing.act.gov.au/Documents/AdoGamReport.pdf
  6. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2000). Youth gambling: a clinical and research perspective. eGambling: Electronic Journal of Gambling, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2004a). The measurement of youth gambling problems: Current instruments, methodological issues, and future directions. In J. Derevensky, & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 121–144). NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R. (2004b). Adolescents with gambling problems: a synopsis of our current knowledge. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling, 10. Retrieved on May 2, 2008, from http://www.snsus.org/pdf/ejgi-issue10.pdf
  9. Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., & Magoon, M. (2004). Adolescent problem gambling: legislative and policy decisions. Gaming Law Review, 8, 107–117. doi: 10.1089/109218804774076385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickson, L. M., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2002). The prevention of gambling problems in youth: a conceptual framework. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 97–159. doi: 10.1023/A:1015557115049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellenbogen, S., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2007). Gender differences among adolescents with gambling-related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 133–143. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9048-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fong, T. W. (2006). Pathological gambling in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 119–147.Google Scholar
  13. Giedd, J. N. (2004). Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 77–85. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998a). Adolescent gambling behavior: a prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319–345. doi: 10.1023/A:1023068925328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998b). An empirical examination of Jacobs' general theory of addictions: do adolescent gamblers fit the theory? Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 17–49. doi: 10.1023/A:1023046509031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: from research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 315–342. doi: 10.1023/A:1009493200768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardoon, K. K., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2004). Psychosocial variables associated with adolescent gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 170–179. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.2.170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haubrich-Casperson, J. (1993). Coping with teen gambling. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, A. C., Dowling, N., Thomas, S. A., Bond, L., & Patton, G. (2008). Adolescent gambling behaviour and attitudes: a prevalence study and correlates in an australian population. International Journal of Health Addiction, 6, 325–352. doi: 10.1007/s11469-008-9149-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: an analysis of long term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 119–152. doi: 10.1023/A:1009476829902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ladouceur, R., Boudreault, N., Jacques, C., & Vitaro, F. (1999). Pathological gambling and related problems among adolescents. Journal of Child Adolescent Substance Abuse, 8, 55–68. doi: 10.1300/J029v08n04_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., & Rohling, M. L. (2004). Individual, family, and peer correlates of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 23–46. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016702.69068.53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (n.d.). Don’t throw your chances away. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://www.thegamble.org/f_facts.htm
  25. Messerlian, C., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2005). Youth gambling problems: a public health perspective. Health Promotion International, 20, 69–79. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 339–347. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.13.4.339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Council on Problem Gambling (2006). Problem gambling resource and fact sheet. Retrieved on September 7, 2007, from https://www.themunsey.com/media/pdf/eapa_flyer.pdf
  28. National Gambling Impact Study Commission (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Washington, DC: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
  30. Pavalko, R. M. (2004). Gambling and public policy. Public Integrity, 6, 333–348.Google Scholar
  31. Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Supportive parenting, ecological context, and children’s adjustment: a seven-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 68, 908–923.Google Scholar
  32. Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand (2006). Crime and gambling. [Brochure]. Auckland, NZ: Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  33. Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand (2008). Is the risk really worth it? Youth and problem gambling. [Brochure]. Auckland, NZ: Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, D. W., Booth, B., Reed, D., & Laughlin, P. R. (1997). Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: a structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality, 65, 649–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00330.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegler, R. (1991). Children’s thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Stinchfield, R. (2000). Gambling and correlates of gambling among Minnesota public school students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 153–173. doi: 10.1023/A:1009428913972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stinchfield, R. (2004). Demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors associated with youth gambling and problem gambling. In J. Derevensky, & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling Problems in Youth: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Stinchfield, R., Hanson, W. E., & Olson, D. H. (2006). Problem and pathological gambling among college students. New Directions for Student Services, 113, 63–72. doi: 10.1002/ss.196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, L. (2008). Evaluating an adolescent measure of gambling pathology. Paradigm, 13(1), 12–13 16–17 Winter.Google Scholar
  40. Turchi, R. M., & Derevensky, J. L. (2006). Youth gambling: not a safe bet. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 18, 454–458. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000236398.17699.0d.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Westphal, J. R., Rush, J. A., Stevens, L., & Johnson, L. J. (2000). Gambling behavior of Louisiana students in grades 6 through 12. Psychiatric Services, 51, 96–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Winters, K. (2008a). Likelihood of developing an alcohol and cannabis use disorder during youth: association with recent use and age. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 92, 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.08.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Winters, K. (2008b). The developing brain, adolescence, and vulnerability to drug abuse. Teaching Resource from the Mentor Foundation. University of Minnesota: The Mentor Foundation. Retrieved September 22, 2008 from http://www.mentorfoundation.org/uploads/Adolescent_Brain_Booklet.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eastern Illinois UniversityCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Illinois Institute for Addiction RecoveryPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations