A Theoretical Model of EGM Problem Gambling: More than a Cognitive Escape

  • Anna Christina Thomas
  • Gavin Brent Sullivan
  • Felicity Catherine Louise Allen


Although electronic gaming machine (EGM) gambling is established as a particularly risky form of gambling (Dowling, Smith and Thomas, Addiction 100:33–45, 2005), models of problem gambling continue to be generalist so factors and processes specific to EGM gambling can be overlooked. This study conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 EGM problem gamblers and six gambling counsellors and used grounded theory methods to develop a theoretical model of EGM problem gambling. The final model demonstrates the importance of both situational and structural characteristics in maintaining excessive EGM gambling. Originally a harmless pastime, EGM gambling became a means by which gamblers cognitively and physically avoided problems. EGM venues were highly accessible, had an inviting atmosphere, and were private yet companionable. Games were entertaining and distracting. Maladaptive coping habits, low social support and few alternative social spaces contributed to the reliance on gambling.


Problem gambling EGM gambling Environment Social support Avoidance coping Qualitative Research 



The authors would like to thank Dr James Phillips and Dr Samantha Thomas for their contributions and insights to an earlier version of the paper.


  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV-TR (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S., & Coventry, L. (1997). Queen of hearts: The needs of women with gambling problems. Melbourne: Financial and Consumer Rights Council.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, D. (2005). Motivational differences between slot machine and lottery players. Psychological Reports, 96, 843–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A., & Wadsworth, M. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crisp, B., Thomas, S., Jackson, A., Smith, S., Borrell, J., Wei-ying, H., et al. (2004). Not the same: a comparison of female and male clients seeking treatment from problem gambling counselling services. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 283–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Dio, K., & Ong, B. (1997). The conceptual link between avoidant coping style, stress and problem gambling. Paper presented at the Responsible gambling: a future winner. Proceedings of the 8th National Association of Gambling Studies conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Dickerson, M. (2004). Analysis of clients presenting to problem gambling counselling services, July 2001 to June 2002, client and services analysis report No. 8. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  9. Dickerson, M., & Baron, E. (2000). Contemporary issues and future directions for research into pathological gambling. Addiction, 95(8), 1145–1159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixey, R. (1996). Bingo in Britain: an analysis of gender and class. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Gambling cultures: Studies in history and interpretation (pp. 136–151). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Doiron, J. P., & Mazer, D. B. (2001). Gambling with video lottery terminals. Qualitative Health Research, 11(5), 631–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling. Addiction, 100, 33–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Gottlieb, B. H. (1997). Conceptual and measurement issues in the study of coping with chronic stress. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 3–40). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual factors in research and clinical interventions. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 5. Feature article.
  16. Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & MacCallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 171–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimberley, H. (2005). The perils of pokies research into the information needs of older women and their families. Melbourne: WIRE Women’s Information and Referral Exchange Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Lepore, S. J. (1997). Social-environmental influences on the chronic stress process. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 133–160). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lesieur, H. R. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Rochester, Vermont: Schenkman Books Inc.Google Scholar
  20. McDaniel, S. R., & Zuckerman, M. (2003). The relationship of impulsive sensation seeking and gender to interest and participation in gambling activities. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1385–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Morrison, L. (2004). Pokie gambling and Māori women: friend or foe? Journal of Gambling Issues, 12, 1–20. Article 3. Scholar
  23. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  24. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (1997). Using grounded theory in psychological research. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 245–274). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pierce, M. Wentzel, J., & Loughnan, T. (1997). Male gamblers/female gamblers—mapping the differences. Paper presented at the Responsible gambling: A future winner. Proceedings of the 8th National Association of Gambling Studies conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  27. Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s gambling industries: Inquiry report no. 10. Canberra: Ausinfo.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Surgey, D. (2000). Playing for time: Exploring the impacts of gambling on women. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  31. Thomas, A., & Moore, S. (2003). The interactive effects of avoidance coping and dysphoric mood on problem gambling for female and male gamblers. eGambling, the Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 8. Research article 1.
  32. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). A qualitative investigation of problem gambling as an escape-based coping strategy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Christina Thomas
    • 1
  • Gavin Brent Sullivan
    • 1
  • Felicity Catherine Louise Allen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological MedicineMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations