Advertisement

Item Specification in the Development of a Diagnostic Gambling Instrument: A Focus Group Approach

  • Renee M. Cunningham-Williams
  • Luis E. Zayas
  • Samantha J. Books
  • Linda B. Cottler
Article

Abstract

Pathological Gambling Disorder (PGD) is internationally prevalent and contributes to significant disruption and impairment in a gambler’s life. For accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, clinicians require standardized criteria as in commonly used DSM and ICD-10 taxonomies, which are conceptually clear, valid, and culturally appropriate. We aimed to describe clinical issues, other than DSM criteria, that may be potentially clinically meaningful to PGD assessment and treatment planning. Participants from St. Louis, Missouri, USA, who self-identified as problem or pathological gamblers or who had a friend or relative with a gambling problem, as well as clinicians with addictions and PGD diagnostic expertise, participated in one of ten focus groups as part of a larger psychometric study aimed at developing and refining a structured, diagnostic gambling assessment tool, the Gambling Assessment Module (GAM©). A content-driven immersion-crystallization qualitative approach yielded insight into gambling behaviors, terminology, and diagnostic issues. While complementary to existing diagnostic taxonomies, these findings provide additional item specification for in-depth clinical assessment.

Keywords

Pathological gambling disorder Diagnostic instrument Focus groups 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by grants to the first author from the National Center for Responsible Gaming (NCRG #12) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health (#K01 DA00430). An earlier draft of this paper fulfilled the partial requirements for a Washington University School of Medicine Master in Psychiatric Epidemiology (MPE) degree awarded to Samantha J. Books. The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable facilitator training and/or feedback on the earlier version of this draft from Norma Ware, Ph.D. and MPE faculty members Wendy Reich, Ph.D. and Anne L. Glowinski, M.D. Administrative, technical, and/or consultation services were provided by the Center for Mental Health Services Research through a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (#5P30 MH068579). This study would not have been possible without the contributions of all of the project staff members, clinicians, and research participants who provided invaluable data for this study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Tovim, D. I., Esterman, A., Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. (2001). The Victorian gambling screen. Project report prepared in association with Flinders Technologies Pty Ltd, Flinders University. Melbourne Victoria: Gambling Research Panel October.Google Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., Dumlao, V., & Lange, M. (1997). “How much do you spend gambling?” Ambiguities in survey questionnaire items. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 237–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borkan, J. (1999). Immersion/crystallization. In B. F. Crabtree, & W. L. Miller (Eds.) Doing qualitative research (pp. 179–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, E. B., & Putnam, F. W. (2000). Dissociative Experience Scale (DES). In A. John Rush Jr. (Ed.) Handbook of psychiatric measures (pp. 621–623). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  8. Cottler, L. B., Robins, L. N., & Helzer, J. E. (1989). The reliability of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Substance Abuse Module-(CIDI-SAM)—A comprehensive substance abuse interview. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 801–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., & Cottler, L. B. (2001). Epidemiology of pathological gambling. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 6, 155–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Cottler, L. B., Compton, W. M., & Books, S. J. (2003a). Gambling Assessment Module (GAM © ). St. Louis, MO: Washington University September.Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Cottler, L. B., Compton, W. M., & Books, S. J. (2003b). Computerized-Gambling Assessment Module (GAM ©). St. Louis, MO: Washington University September.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Grucza, R. A., Cottler, L. B., Womack, S. B., Books, S. J., Przybeck, T. R., et al. (2005). Prevalence and predictors of pathological gambling: results from the St. Louis personality, health, and lifestyle (SLPHL) study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 39(4), 377–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., & Hong, S. (2007). A latent class analysis (LCA) of problem gambling among a sample of community-recruited gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(11), 939–947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Ostmann, E. L., Spitznagel, E. L., & Books, S. J. (2007). Racial/Ethnic variation in the reliability of pathological gambling disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(7), 551–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeFuentes-Merillas, L., Koeter, M. W. J., Bethlehem, J., Schippersm, G. M., & VanDenBrink, W. (2003). Are scratch cards addictive? The prevalence of scratch card gambling among adult scratch card buyers in the Netherlands. Addiction, 98(6), 725–731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Final Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center April.Google Scholar
  17. Grant, J. W., & Kim, S. W. (2003). Dissociative symptoms in pathological gambling. Psychopathology, 36, 200–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keith, M., Cann, B., Brophy, J., Hellyer, D., Day, M., Egan, S., et al. (2001). Identifying and prioritizing gaming workers’ health and safety concerns using mapping for data collection. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 39, 42–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Lange, M. A. (2001). If you do not gamble, check this box: Perceptions of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(3), 247–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Missouri Alliance to Curb Problem Gambling. (2006). Annual report 2006. Retrieved August 11, 2007 from http://www.888betsoff.org/alliance/06_annual_report.pdf.
  22. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. National Research Council (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
  25. Nassar-McMillan, S. C., & Borders, L. D. (2002, March). Use of focus groups in survey item development. The Qualitative Report, 7(1). Retrieved August 10, 2007 from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-1/nassar.html.
  26. Neighbors, C., Lostustter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimaer, M. E. (2002). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 364–369.Google Scholar
  27. Petry, N. M. (2003). A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction, 98, 649–650.Google Scholar
  28. Petry, N. M. (2004). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  29. Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 564–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potenza, M. N., Steinberg, M. A., McLaughlin, S. D., Wu, R., Rounsaville, B. J., & O’Malley, S. S. (2000). Illegal behavior in problem gambling: Analysis of data from a gambling helpline. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 389–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards, L., & Richards, T. (2000). Using N5 in qualitative research and the reference guide. Bundoora, AU: QSR International.Google Scholar
  32. Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., & Kidman, R. C. (2002). The Iowa Department of Public Health Gambling Treatment Services: Four years of evidence (Technical Report #101102-200). Boston, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College, Division of Addictions.Google Scholar
  34. Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. (2001). An evaluation of diagnostic criteria for Pathological gambling. Windsor, Ontario: Problem Gambling Research Group, University of Windsor.Google Scholar
  35. Toce-Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2003). A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction, 98(12), 1661–1672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Welte, J., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., & Tidwell, M. C. (2004). Gambling participation and pathology in the United States: A socio-demographic analysis using classification trees. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 983–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Adolescent perceptions of the study of the National Lottery and scratch cards: A qualitative study using group interviews. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. World Health Organization (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renee M. Cunningham-Williams
    • 1
  • Luis E. Zayas
    • 1
  • Samantha J. Books
    • 1
  • Linda B. Cottler
    • 2
  1. 1.Brown School of Social WorkWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations