Advertisement

Review of Pop-Up Messages on Electronic Gaming Machines as a Proposed Responsible Gambling Strategy

  • Sally Monaghan
Article

Abstract

Gambling revenue worldwide is increasing and associated increases in problem gambling heighten the need for effective responsible gambling strategies. This is particularly important for electronic gaming machines (EGMs), which are purported to make the largest contribution to problem gambling. In an attempt to increase the effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies, governments in Australia, New Zealand and Canada have supported the implementation of ‘pop-up’ messages on EGMs to break play and inform gamblers when they have been playing continuously for a set period of time. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence available regarding the efficacy of pop-up messages as a responsible gambling strategy for EGMs. While there is some evidence of the usefulness of these messages limitations remain to the known value of this strategy. Further research is needed to determine the optimal frequency of and content of pop-up messages, and the extent to which this method potentially minimises gambling-related harm.

Keywords

Electronic gaming machines Pop-up messages Responsible gambling Policy Literature review 

References

  1. Bailey, B., Konstan, J., & Carlis, J. (2001). The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC-13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interactions. Tokyo, 593–601.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A. (2000). Overcoming Compulsive Gambling. London: Robinson.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The Assessment of the Impact of the Reconfiguration of Electronic Gaming Machines as Harm Minimisation Strategies for Problem Gambling. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney’s Gambling Research Unit.Google Scholar
  4. Cloutier, M., Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2006). Responsible gambling tools: Pop-up messages and pauses on video lottery terminals. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140, 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coulombe, A., Ladouceur, R., Deshairnais, R., & Jobin, J. (1992). Erroneous perceptions and arousal among regular and irregular video poker players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delfabbro, P., & Winefield, A. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. Journal of Psychology, 134, 117–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Gaming and Racing (2006). Industry Statistics. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.dgr.nsw.gov.au.
  8. Department of Internal Affairs (2005). Mandatory “pop-up” on gaming machines will interrupt gambling for 15 second intervals. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.dia.govt.nz.
  9. Dixon, M. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: Variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over chance outcomes. Psychological Record, 50, 705–720.Google Scholar
  10. Floyd, K., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2006). Use of warning messages to modify gambling beliefs and behavior in a laboratory investigation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 69–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Focal Research (2004). 2003 NS VL Responsible Gaming Features Evaluation: Final Report. Focal Research Consultants Ltd.: Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
  12. Hing, N. (2003). An assessment of member awareness, perceived adequacy and perceived effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies in Sydney clubs. Retrieved May 16, 2004, from http://www.dgr.nsw.gov.au/.
  13. Hing, N., Dickerson, M., & Mackellar, J. (2001). Australian Gaming Council Summary Responsible Gambling Document. Australian Gaming Council, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  14. Krugman, D., Fox, R., Fletcher, J., & Rojas, T. (1994). Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye tracking approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 34, 39–52.Google Scholar
  15. Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2003). Interactive messages on video lottery terminals and persistence in gambling. Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 15, 45–50.Google Scholar
  16. Ladouceur, R., & Walker, M. (1996). A cognitive perspective on gambling. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.) Trends in Cognitive Therapy (pp.89–120) Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Lesieur, H. R. (1988). The female pathological gambler. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.) Gambling Studies: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking. Reno, NV: University of Nevada.Google Scholar
  18. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1990). Characteristics of pathological gamblers identified among patients on a psychiatric admissions service. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 1009–1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nevitt, J. R., & Lundak, J. (2005). Accuracy of self-reports of alcohol offenders in a rural Midwestern county. Psychological Reports, 96, 511–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorenz, V. C., & Yaffee, R. A. (1986). Pathological gambling: Psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the gambler. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCusker, C., & Gettings, B. (1997). Automaticity of cognitive biases in addictive behaviors: Further evidence with gamblers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 5423–5554.Google Scholar
  22. Monaghan, S. (2004). Recall of Legislated Electronic Gaming Machine Signs & Irrational Cognitions and Beliefs Regarding Gambling. Honours Dissertation: The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  23. New South Wales Government (2005). Towards a Culture of Responsibility in Gambling. Authors: Sydney.Google Scholar
  24. Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation (2002). Report confirms gaming corp. on the right track. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.gov.ns.ca.
  25. Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries: Final Report. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
  26. Schellink, T. & Schrans, T. (2002). Atlantic Lottery Corporation Video Lottery Responsible Gaming Feature Research: Final Report. Halifax, Nova Scotia. Focal Research Consultants.Google Scholar
  27. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stockley, C. (2001). The effectiveness of strategies such as health warning labels to reduce alcohol-related harms: An Australian perspective. International Journal on Drug Policy, 12, 153–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J-M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 15, 727–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Volberg, R. A., Dickerson, M. G., Ladouceur, R., & Abbott, M. W. (1996). Prevalence studies and the development of services for problem gamblers and their families. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wynne, H. (1994). A Description of Problem Gamblers in Alberta: A Secondary Analysis of the Gambling and Problem Gambling in Alberta Study. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations