Advertisement

The ‘Public Accountability Approach’: Suggestions for a Framework to Characterise, Compare, Inform and Evaluate Gambling Regulation

  • Jennifer Borrell
Article

Abstract

It is argued that the analytical comparison of gambling regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions requires the identification of salient dimensions to provide the basis for such. It is further suggested that governmental ‘conflict of interest’ might provide a useful dimension for such comparison, as operationalised by concomitant EGM harm and government dependence criteria. The same ‘conflict of interest’ criteria are then suggested as a guide for gambling regulation within single jurisdictions, this being named the ‘Public Accountability Approach.’ These points are discussed within broader reference to lines and webs of harm production within a public health analysis. Broader reference is also made to the proper role of government within contemporary democracy.

Keywords

Gambling regulation EGM Conflict of interest Public health Precautionary principle Accountability 

References

  1. Australian Gaming Machine Manufacturers Association (AGMMA) (n.d.). Australian Gaming Machines. Do you know the whole story? Retrieved September 21, 2006, from http://www.agmma.com/pdf/gamingmachines.pdf.
  2. Australian Institute for Gambling Research (AIGR) (2002). Methodology project for the Victorian Local Governance Association. Melbourne: VLGA.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno Model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the reconfiguration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling: A report for the gaming industry operator’s group. Sydney: University Printing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Borrell, J. (2005). The implications of values in gambling research. Paper presented at the 4th annual Alberta conference on gambling research: Public policy implications of gambling research. Alberta: Alberta Gaming Research Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Borrell, J., & Boulet, J. (2001a). What is harm reduction (or harm minimisation)? VLGA Gambling Research Newsletter, 1(9), 4–6.Google Scholar
  7. Borrell, J., & Boulet, J. (2001b). VCGA hearings, the onus of proof and the Precautionary Principle. VLGA Gambling Research Newsletter, 2(3), 6–8.Google Scholar
  8. Borrell, J., & Boulet, J. (2005). A theoretical exploration of culture and community: Implications for prevention, research and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13.Google Scholar
  9. Bostock, W. W. (2005). Australia’s gambling policy: Motivations, implications and options. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13. Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, C. (2005). Policy implications of the Law Commission of Canada study on ‘The Legalisation of Gambling in Canada’. Paper presented at the 4th annual Alberta conference on gambling research: Public policy implications of gambling research. Alberta: Alberta Gaming Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Chevalier, S., & Papineau, É. (2004). The measurement of gambling offer. Paper presented to the Insight Nova Scotia Conference. Halifax.Google Scholar
  12. Dempsey, K. (2005). Values in business. New Community Quarterly, 2(4), 5–6.Google Scholar
  13. Dickerson, M., Haw, J., & Shepherd, L. (2003). The psychological causes of problem gambling: A Longitudinal study of at risk recreational EGM players. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, School of Psychology.Google Scholar
  14. Doughney, J. (2005). The social economics of poker machines in Victoria: The human, policy and legal implications of the evidence. (in publication).Google Scholar
  15. Hartley, E., & Borrell, J. (2004). Gaming machines: Technology, industry and marketing. (Unpub manuscript).Google Scholar
  16. Horbay, R. (2004). Slot tutorial treatment guide. Ontario: Game Planit Interactive Corp.Google Scholar
  17. Keane, J. (n.d.). Complex democracy. Retrieved September 21, 2006, from http://www.johnkeane.net/pdf_docs/jk_complex_democracy.pdf.
  18. Kickbusch, I. (1989). Good planets are hard to find. Approaches to an ecological base for public health. Paper presented to the Sustainable Development and Health workshop. Melbourne.Google Scholar
  19. Korn, D. A. (2001). Examining gambling issues from a public health perspective. The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 4.Google Scholar
  20. Lepper, J. (2004). Competition and control in UK gambling policy. Presentation to the Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand — Taking Stock’ Conference. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Livingstone, C. (2001). The VLGA gambling policy framework. VLGA Gambling Research Newsletter, 2(2), 7.Google Scholar
  22. Livingstone, C. (2005) Desire and the consumption of danger: Electronic gaming machines and the commodification of interiority. Addiction Research and Theory, 6, 523–534.Google Scholar
  23. Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Borrell, J., Bakacs, L., & Jordan, L. (2006). The Changing Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) industry and technology: Final Report, Prepared by Australian Institute for Primary Care (AIPC), La Trobe University for the Department of Justice, gambling research program: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  24. Markland, J. (2005). How New Zealand’s Gambling Act 2003 prevents and minimises harm. Presentation to the International Conference on Problem gambling: Living with gambling —A global community response. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (1996) Ethics in the Public Service: Current issues and practice. Public Management Occasional Paper. No: 14. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved October 7 from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/24/1898992.pdf.
  26. Øyen, E. (2002). Poverty Production: A Different Approach to Poverty Understanding. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Science and Social Policy in the 21st Century, Vienna. Retrieved 4 June 2006 from: http://www.crop.org/publications/reports.cfm.
  27. Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries, Report No.10, Volume 1. Ausinfo: Canberra. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/gambling/finalreport/.
  28. Raeburn, J. (2005). The Reno model and gambling-related public health in New Zealand — A critical appraisal. Presentation to Policy, Practice and Research — One year on conference. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology and Gambling Helpline New Zealand.Google Scholar
  29. Raeburn, J., & Herd, R. (2003). Gambling and public health: A workplan. Prepared for the Problem Gambling Committee as a joint venture between Hapai Te Hawora Tapai Ltd and the Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  30. Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (1998) Nova Scotia VL Player’s Survey. Focal Research Consultants Ltd for the Nova Scotia Department of Health: Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
  31. Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2005). A framework for a global gambling strategy, responsible gambling, public policy and research: The Halifax Model. Presentation to the 4th Annual Alberta Conference on Gambling Research. Alberta: Alberta Gambling Research Institute. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://gaming.uleth.ca/agri_downloads/1482/schellinck.pdf.
  32. Smith, G., & Wynn, H. (2004). VLT gambling in Alberta: A preliminary analysis. Alberta: Alberta Gaming Research Institute.Google Scholar
  33. South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (2005). Problem gambling harm: Towards a national definition. Melbourne: Office of Gaming and Racing for Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (2006). Vision for the Gaming Industry (submission to the Victorian EGM licence review), Tabcorp Holdings Ltd: Melbourne. Retrieved August 4, 2006, from www.justice.vic.gov.au.
  35. Tattersall’s (2006). Gaming Machine Licence Arrangements Post-2012 Issues Paper. Tattersall’s: Melbourne. Retrieved August 4, 2006, from www.justice.vic.gov.au.
  36. Williams, R., & Wood, R. (2004) Final report: The demographic sources of ontario gaming revenue. University of Lethbridge for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre: Lethbridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borderlands CooperativeMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations