Pathological and Sub-clinical Problem Gambling in a New Zealand Prison: A Comparison of the Eight and SOGS Gambling Screens
- 147 Downloads
Prison populations have been identified as having elevated levels of problem gambling prevalence, and screening for problem gambling may provide an opportunity to identify and address a behaviour that may otherwise lead to re-offending. A problem gambling screen for this purpose would need to be brief, simple to score, and be able to be administered, with limited training, by prison assessors. The Eight Screen was developed as a brief tool for Family Doctors to use in a patient population, but has also been used effectively in more generalised populations. In this study 100 inmates received into a medium security prison were screened using the Eight screen and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), with those scoring three or more on either screen then being assessed by a specialist clinician using DSM-IV Pathological Gambling Disorder criteria. Twenty-nine inmates were screen positives who also correlated highly with assessed gambling pathology. The Eight Screen appears to be a suitable gambling screen for prison use and has since been adopted as an assessment instrument by the New Zealand Department of Corrections.
KeywordsProblem gambling Eight Screen Prison Pathological gambling Screening SOGS
The authors wish to acknowledge the helpful assistance and contribution of the New Zealand Department of Corrections and the Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand
Statement if interest
The lead author developed the Eight Screen and has been a Board member of the Problem Gambling Foundation. The second author is currently a member of the Board of the Problem Gambling Foundation, while the third author is a manager and clinical psychologist with the New Zealand Department of Corrections.
- Abbott, M., & McKenna, B. (2000). Gambling and problem gambling among recently sentenced women prisoners in New Zealand. Report No. 4 of the NZ Gaming Survey. Wellington: Dept Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
- Abbott, M., McKenna, B., & Giles, L. (2000). Gambling and problem gambling among recently sentenced males in four New Zealand prisons. Report No.5 of the NZ Gaming Survey. Wellington: Dept Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association.(1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.). Washington DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Brown, R., Adams, P., Skinner, B., Sullivan, S., & Gerdelan, R. (2001). Pathological gambling among New Zealand prison inmates. Paper presented at the Gambling: Understanding & Minimising Harm Conference, 25 July, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gambling Act (2003). In http://www.legislation.govt.nz.
- Jackson, A., Thomas, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Measuring problem gambling: Evaluation of the Victorian Gambling Screen. Victoria: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- Sackett, D., Haynes, R., Guyatt, G., & Tugwell, P. (1991). Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H., Hall, M., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston: Harvard.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S. (1994). Pathological gambling: Psychiatry series. Patient Management, August,79–85.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S. (1999). Development of the Eight Screen: Thesis for PhD. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
- The Wager. (2004). Developing new screening instruments: A look at the CPGI. Volume 9 Number 3—January 21, 2004.Google Scholar
- Wenzel, M., McMillen, J., Marshall, D., & Ahmed, E. (2004). Validation of the Victorian Gambling Screen. Victoria: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease. WHO Public Health Papers, No 34. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar