Factors that Predict Treatment Outcomes in a Community Treatment Agency for Problem Gamblers

  • Namrata Raylu
  • Tian P. S. Oei


The study reported on factors that were associated with treatment outcomes of problem gamblers in an Australian outpatient treatment agency. Data were collected over a 2-1/2 year period by therapists using semi-structured interviews and monitoring clients’ treatment progress on the 488 clients during treatment. Results showed that gross personal income, problem gambling behaviors (i.e., preoccupation, tolerance to gambling, withdrawal symptoms and gambling to escape), excessive behaviors, intrapersonal difficulties and abuse issues significantly predicted resolution of gambling correlates and/or methods of treatment cessation. Implications for these findings and directions for future research were also discussed.


Gambling Problem gambling Treatment Abuse Outcome Evaluation 



We would like to thank BreakEven, Relationships Australia and the Department of Family Services, Queensland for making the data available. In particular we would like to thank Gail Solcombe, Mary Marquass and Ian McDonald for their assistance.


  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., McConaghy, N., & Frankova, A. (1991). A comparison of relapsed and non-relapsed abstinent pathological gamblers following behavioral treatment. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1485–1489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crisp, B. R., Jackson, A., Thomas, S. A., Thomason, N. R., Smith, S. A., Borrell, J., et al. (2001). Is more better? The relationship between outcomes achieved by problem gamblers and the number of counselling sessions attended. Australian Social Work, 54(3), 83–92.Google Scholar
  4. Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A., & Thomason, N. R. (2001). The influence of demographic, behavioural and treatment characteristics on problem gambling counselling outcomes. Australian Journal of Primary Health Interchange, 7(2), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A., Thomason, N. R., Smith, S. A., Borrell, J., et al. (2000). Sex differences in the treatment needs and outcomes of problem gamblers. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(2), 229–242.Google Scholar
  6. Echeburua, E., Fernandez-Montalvo, J., & Baez-Gallo, C. (2001). Predictors of therapeutic failure in slot machine pathological gamblers following behavioral treatment. Behavioral & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. G. K., & Rollnick, S. (1997). Outcome studies of a brief alcohol intervention in general practice: The problem of lost subjects. Addiction, 92, 1699–1704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., & Kuskowski, M. (2004). Retrospective review of treatment retention in pathological gambling. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45(2), 83–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudak, C. J., Varghese, R., & Politzer, R. M. (1989). Family, marital, and occupational satisfaction for recovering pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, A., Thomas, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Best practice in problem gambling services. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, A., Thomas, S., Thomason, N., & Ho, W. (2000). Longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of problem gambling counseling services, community education strategies and information products—vol 2: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the counseling interventions at breakeven problem gambling counseling services. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  12. Kazdin, A. E., & Mazurick, J. L. (1994). Dropping out of child psychotherapy: Distinguishing early and late dropouts over the course of treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1069–1074.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., Laberge, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2001). Dropouts in clinical research: Do results reported reflect clinical reality? Behavior Therapist, 24, 44–46.Google Scholar
  14. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leblond, J., Ladouceur, R., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Which pathological gamblers will complete treatment? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 205–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Milton, S., Crino, R., Hunt, C., & Prosser, E. (2002). The effect of compliance-improving interventions on the cognitive-behavioural treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(2), 207–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murcia, S. J., Moya, E. A., Perez, R. G., Aymami, M. N., Pena, M. G., Jaurrieta, N., et al. (2005). Analysis of the effectiveness of two types of group cognitive-behavioral treatment of pathological gambling. Psicologia Conductual Revista Internacional de Psicologia Clinica de las Salud, 13(3), 495–510.Google Scholar
  19. National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA) (2000). Current “best practice” interventions for gambling problems: A theoretical and empirical review. Victoria: Flinders University of South Australia, Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  20. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(7), 1009–1061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, S., Thomas, S., & Jackson, A. (2004). An exploration of the therapeutic relationship and counseling outcomes in a problem gambling counseling service. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(1), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stinchfield, R., Kushner, M. G., & Winters, K. C. (2005). Alcohol use and prior substance abuse treatment in relation to gambling problem severity and gambling treatment outcomes. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 273–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Toce-Gerstein, M., & Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2003). A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction, 98, 1661–1672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Toneatto, T., Skinner, W., & Dragonetti, R. (2002). Patterns of substance use in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: Impact on treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(7), 853–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wierzbicki, M., & Pekarik, G. (1993). A meta analysis of psychotherapy dropout. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 24, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winters, K. C., & Kushner, M. G. (2003). Treatment issues pertaining to pathological gamblers with a comorbid disorder. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(3), 261–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zion, M. M., Tracy, E., & Abell, N. (1991). Examining the relationship between spousal involvement in Gam-Anon and relapse behaviors in pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7(2), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations