Positive Thinking Among Slot Machine Gamblers: A Case of Maladaptive Coping?
- 540 Downloads
Research has demonstrated that optimism and “positive illusions” can be used a coping mechanism among those facing adversity. Gamblers are a little studied group who also experience adversity and uncertainty. They often feel considerable levels of frustration, guilt, anger and a sense of feeling cheated after making significant losses. In order to deal with such feelings it is hypothesized that these individuals will search for positive consequences from their behaviour in order to offset this negative affect.
To (1) determine whether after gambling, gamblers compensate and reduce negative affect by identifying positive consequences from experiencing a loss, and (2) identify types of strategies which gamblers employ and consider how these should be classified.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-seven regular slot machine gamblers were interviewed in a variety of environments housing slot machines. Each participant was asked a series of questions in a semi-structured format, to explore possible styles of positive thinking.
Nine types of ‘positive thinking’ experienced by gamblers were identified. These included Comparative thinking, Prophylactic thinking, Biased frequency thinking, Responsibility avoidance, Chasing Validation, Prioritization, Resourcefulness, Thoughtfulness, and Fear Reduction. Gamblers who were positive thinkers experienced significantly less guilt than non-positive thinkers.
While reduction of negative affect may be perceived as positive in many other contexts, it is argued that it may counteract efforts to promote responsible gambling. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.
KeywordsGambling Gamblers Slot machines Positive thinking Cognitive bias
- Blaszczynski, A. P., & Silove, D. (1997). Pathological gambling: Forensic issues. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 30(3), 358–369.Google Scholar
- Campbell, F. (1976). Gambling: A positive view. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and society. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Skokan, L. A. (1990). A better world or a shattered vision? Changes in perspectives following victimization. Social Cognition, 8, 263–285.Google Scholar
- Dickerson, M. C. (1974). The effect of betting shop experience on gambling behaviour. Ph.D. thesis. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L.A. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1969). Where the action is: Three essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.Google Scholar
- Herman, R. D. (1976). Gamblers and gambling. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 136–142, January.Google Scholar
- Loftus, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. (1983). Mind at play: The psychology of video games. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Slot machine gamblers—Why are they so hard to study? Journal of Gambling Issues, 6, located at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue6/opinion/index.html.
- Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., Reed, G. M., & Aspinwall, L. G. (1991). Assault on the self: Positive illusion and adjustments to threatening events. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 239–254). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. E., Lichtman, R. R., & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control and adjustments to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 378–393.Google Scholar
- Tesser, A. (1998). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181–227). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes in gambling behaviour. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar