Abstract
The characteristics of hybrid surface plasmon modes in a double-layer graphene cylindrical waveguide filled with metamaterials are theoretically investigated. The dispersion relation for different configurations of metamaterials (double positive (DPS)-graphene-double negative (DNG)-graphene-DPS and DNG-graphene-DPS-graphene-DNG) is derived by solving Maxwell’s equations for cylindrical symmetry and implementing impedance boundary conditions at the interface. The Kubo formalism is used for the modeling of the electromagnetic response of graphene. The influence of the interlayer distance of graphene, chemical potential of graphene, and permittivity of interlayer metamaterials on the dispersion curve, effective mode index, propagation length, and phase velocity are presented. It is observed that the existence of double layers of graphene along with metamaterials provides better control and tuning of the propagation of the surface waves. The coupled surface plasmon polariton (SPP) and surface phonon polariton (SPhP) in the optical regime are observed due to the coupling of electromagnetic waves between graphene layers. The forward- and backward-propagating surface waves for the fundamental mode are studied for different waveguide configurations. The active trapping of light and tunable fast and ultraslow plasmon modes for both forward and backward propagation modes for the proposed design may enable the realization of potential optoelectronic applications, such as modulators, fast forward-wave amplifiers, frequency selectors, back wave contra couplers, thermal sensors, circular polarizers, slow light devices, infrared (IR) and molecular spectroscopy, on-chip buffers, communication switches, and energy devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Detail about data has been provided in the article.
Change history
09 April 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-021-01411-y
References
Novoselov KS, Fal V, Colombo L, Gellert P, Schwab M, Kim K (2012) A roadmap for graphene. Nat 490:106–200
Ritchie RH (1957) Plasma losses by fast electrons in thin films. Phys Rev 106:874
Wang J, Hu C, Zhang J (2014) Multifunctional and multi-output plasmonic meta-elements for integrated optical circuits. Opt Express 22:22753–22762
Ooi KJA, Tan DTH (2017) Nonlinear grapheneplasmonics. Pro Math Phys Eng Sci 473:20170433
Hanson GW (2013) Erratum: Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene [J. Appl. Phys. 103, 064302 (2008)]. J Appl Phys 113:029902
Woessner A, Lundeberg MB, Gao Y, Principi A, Alonso-González P, Carrega M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Vignale G, Polini M (2015) Highly confined low-loss plasmons in graphene–boron nitride heterostructures. Nat Mater 14:421–425
Wu Y, Wu W, Dai X (2019) SPPs in a double layer graphene system with an anisotropic dielectric. Results Phys 15:102718
Grigorenko A, Polini M, Novoselov K (2012) Grapheneplasmonics. Nat Photonics 6:749–758
Zhao T, Gong S, Hu M, Zhong R, Liu D, Chen X, Zhang P, Wang X, Zhang C, Wu P (2015) Coherent and tunable terahertz radiation from graphene surface plasmonpolarirons excited by cyclotron electron beam. Scientific Rep 5:16059
Gong S, Zhao T, Sanderson M, Hu M, Zhong R, Chen X, Zhang P, Zhang C, Liu S (2015) Transformation of surface plasmonpolaritons to radiation in graphene in terahertz regime. Appl Phys Lett 106:223107
Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljačić M (2009) Plasmonics in graphene at infrared frequencies. Phys Review B 80:245435
Constant TJ, Hornett SM, Chang DE, Hendry E (2016) All-optical generation of surface plasmons in graphene. Nat Phys 12:124–127
Ni G, McLeod A, Sun Z, Wang L, Xiong L, Post K, Sunku S, Jiang B-Y, Hone J, Dean CR (2018) Fundamental limits to grapheneplasmonics. Nat 557:530–533
Yu R, Alaee R, Lederer F, Rockstuhl C (2014) Manipulating the interaction between localized and delocalized surface plasmon-polaritons in graphene. Phys Rev B 90:085409
Kuila T, Bose S, Khanra P, Mishra AK, Kim NH, Lee JH (2011) Recent advances in graphene-based biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 26:4637–4648
Wang B, Zhang X, García-Vidal FJ, Yuan X, Teng J (2012) Strong coupling of surface plasmonpolaritons in monolayer graphene sheet arrays. Phys Rev Lett 109:073901
Zhao T, Hu M, Zhong R, Chen X, Zhang P, Gong S, Zhang C, Liu S (2016) Plasmon modes of circular cylindrical double-layer graphene. Opt Express 24:20461–20471
Hajian H, Rukhlenko ID, Leung PT, Caglayan H, Ozbay E (2016) Guided plasmon modes of a graphene-coated Kerr slab. Plasmon 11:735–741
Correas-Serrano D, Gomez-Diaz J, Alvarez-Melcon A (2014) Surface plasmons in graphene cylindrical waveguides. In: 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI), IEEE, p 896–897.
Hwang E, Sarma SD (2009) Plasmon modes of spatially separated double-layer graphene. Phys Rev B 80:205405
Zhu J-J, Badalyan S, Peeters F (2013) Plasmonic excitations in Coulomb-coupled N-layer graphene structures. Phys Rev B 87:085401
Wang B, Zhang X, Yuan X, Teng J (2012) Optical coupling of surface plasmons between graphene sheets. Appl Phys Lett 100:131111
Yang J, Yang J, Deng W, Mao F, Huang M (2015) Transmission properties and molecular sensing application of CGPW. Opt Express 23:32289–32299
Li W, Chen B, Meng C, Fang W, Xiao Y, Li X, Hu Z, Xu Y, Tong L, Wang H (2014) Ultrafast all-optical graphene modulator. Nano Lett 14:955–959
Francescato Y, Giannini V, Maier SA (2013) Strongly confined gap plasmon modes in graphene sandwiches and graphene-on-silicon. New J Phys 15:063020
Yaqoob M, Ghaffar A, Alkanhal MA, Aladadi YT (2019) Analysis of hybrid surface wave propagation supported by chiral metamaterial–graphene–metamaterial structures. Results Phys 14:102378
Yaqoob M, Ghaffar A, Alkanhal M, ur Rehman S, Razzaz F (2018) Hybrid surface plasmon polariton wave generation and modulation by chiral-graphene-metal (CGM) structure. Scientific Rep 8:1–9
Baqir MA, Choudhury PK, Farmani A, Younas T, Arshad J, Mir A, Karimi S (2019) Tunable plasmon induced transparency in graphene and hyperbolic metamaterial-based structure. IEEE Photonics J 11:1–10
Rufangura P, Folland TG, Agrawal A, Caldwell JD, Iacopi F (2020) Towards low-loss on-chip nanophotonics with coupled graphene and silicon carbide: A review. J Phys Mater 3:032005
Efetov DK, Kim P (2010) Controlling electron-phonon interactions in graphene at ultrahigh carrier densities. Phys Rev Lett 105:256805
Yao B, Liu Y, Huang S-W, Choi C, Xie Z, Flores JF, Wu Y, Yu M, Kwong D-L, Huang Y (2018) Broadband gate-tunable terahertz plasmons in grapheneheterostructures. Nat Photonics 12:22–28
Baqir MA, Naqvi SA (2020) Electrically tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber comprised Cu/graphene strips. Plasmon
Baqir M, Choudhury P (2017) Graphene-based slab waveguide for slow-light propagation and mode filtering. J Electromagn Waves Appl 31:2055–2063
Hao R, Peng X-L, Li E-P, Xu Y, Jin J-M, Zhang X-M, Chen H-S (2015) Improved slow light capacity in graphene-based waveguide. Scientific Rep 5:15335
Funding
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number IFKSURG-1436–012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Maryam Saeed, A. Ghaffar, and Y. Khan derived analytical expressions and numerical analysis. They wrote the main manuscript text. Majeed Alkanhal and Ali H. Alqahtani developed methodology in the given study.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: We have found an error in the affiliations of the two authors in the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saeed, M., Alkanhal, M.A.S., Ghaffar, A. et al. Energy Plasmon Modes in Metamaterial-filled Double-layer Graphene-wrapped Cylindrical Waveguides. Plasmonics 16, 695–709 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01328-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01328-y