Plasmonics

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Improved Absorbance and Near-Infrared Dispersion of AuGe Nanoparticles over Au Nanoparticles Prepared with Similar Thermal Annealing Environment

  • Lavi Tyagi
  • S. Chakrabarti
  • S. K. Pandey
  • P. Shete
  • H. Rawool
  • Debiprasad Panda
  • H. Ghadi
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The difficulty in patterning the structures at sub-wavelength range leads to employ the bottom-up approach to form nanostructures of metals as well as dielectric components that disperse them in host media. The optical properties of nanoparticles are studied with UV-Vis 750 (lambda) NIR spectroscopy and fit with empirical relations. The refractive index is about the volume fraction of particles. The AuGe nanoparticles demonstrate improved absorbance, lower refractive index, and higher extinction than Au nanoparticles formed with similar thermal process. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) phenomena are highly sensitive to the bonding between atoms, atomic structure, and the electronic configuration in atoms of the given material. If one takes into account the structure of materials, then the literature on eutectic alloys predicts that alloying gold with germanium (AuGe) with varying compositions will also change the x-ray diffraction peak positions of gold itself. The peak shift can be interpreted as the change in grain size or shift in grain boundaries implying a corresponding change in material’s atomic arrangement within lattice structure. As a result, there will be a change in the charge distribution of free electron cloud in original gold ultimately affecting a change in the plasmon resonance frequency and thereby modulating the various optical phenomena such as absorbance, reflectance, and refractive index. This alloying also brings a change in the dielectric constant of the material such that the plasmonic behavior may shift among different regions (UV, visible, NIR, MWIR, and LWIR). Metal semiconductor eutectic alloy which is widely popular as a soldering material would have scope in futuristic photonic applications due to its tuneable optical properties. In this work, we study the effects of Au and AuGe nanoparticle deposition on GaAs films grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Au and AuGe thin films (12-nm thick) were annealed in the temperature ranges of 400–800 and 300–700 °C, respectively, to form Au and AuGe nanoparticles. The formation of these nanoparticles was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements. Optical absorption spectroscopy measurements showed plasmon resonance peaks at around 670 and 535 nm for the AuGe-deposited 300 °C-annealed sample and Au-deposited 600 °C-annealed sample on sapphire, respectively, thereby confirming the plasmonic effect. Correlation of Raman spectroscopy measurement results with X-ray diffraction measurement results reveal that the transverse optical mode intensity and full width at half maximum of the GaAs (400) peak increased with an increase in annealing temperature, indicating degradation of the crystalline properties of GaAs film at higher annealing temperatures. The highest increments of the photoluminescence (PL) intensities in comparison to that of the bare GaAs film were observed to be 37 and 77% for the Au-deposited 600 °C-annealed and AuGe-deposited 300 °C-annealed samples, respectively. These enhancements of PL spectra are an indication of the significant scattering of photons by Au and AuGe nanoparticles, and they are attributed mainly to the contribution of the local surface plasmon resonance of these nanoparticles. A comparative analysis of PL enhancements revealed that AuGe nanoparticles induced a greater enhancement than Au nanoparticles. The calculated activation energies of the Au-deposited 600 °C-annealed sample, AuGe-deposited 300 °C-annealed sample, and bare GaAs sample were around 18, 24, and 33 meV, respectively. We found one-order increment in peak responsivity of AuGe plasmonic-based trilayer InAs quantum dot detector in comparison to as-grown detector at 80 K. Therefore, this study is expected to be very useful in the realization of high-performance plasmonic-based optoelectronic and sensing devices.

Keywords

GaAs AuGe Au Nanoparticles Photoluminescence Scanning electron microscopy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Prof. B. M. Arora (EE Department IIT Bombay) for directing us about suitable literature and Prof. Amartya Mukhopadhyay (MEMS), IIT Bombay, for his kind support of FIB tool. Finally, we would like to thank Riber France for the MBE system.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu M, Chen J, Li ZY, Au L, Hartland GV, Li X, Marquez M, Xia Y (2006) Gold nanostructures: engineering their plasmonic properties for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 35:1084–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang JZ (2010) Biomedical applications of shape-controlled plasmonic nanostructures: a case study of hollow gold nanospheres for photothermal ablation therapy of cancer. J Phys Chem Lett 1(4):686–695.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jz900366c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sailor MJ, Park JH (2012) Hybrid nanoparticles for detection and treatment of cancer. Adv Mater 24(28):3779–3802.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin P, Grace MH, Boris S, Yeshaiahu F (2007) Enhanced photoluminescence from gallium arsenide semiconductor coated with Au nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 91:123112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catchpole KR, Polman A (2008) Plasmonic solar cells. Opt Express 16(26):21793–21800.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.021793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu C, He C, Lee H, Chen H, Gwo S (2010) Surface-plasmon-mediated photoluminescence enhancement from red-emitting InGaN coupled with colloidal gold nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 114(30):12987–12993.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1043199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang KY, Choi KC, Ahn CW (2009) Effect of gold nanorods and nanocubes on electroluminescent performances in organic light emitting diodes and its working mechanism. Appl Phys Lett 94(17):173301.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3125249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raether H (1988) Surface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 4–38Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shen H, Lu G, Ou M, Marquette CA, Ledoux G, Roux S, Tillement O, Perriat P, Cheng B, Chen Z (2007) How the morphology of biochips roughness increases surface-enhanced chemiluminescence. Chem Phys Lett 439(1-3):105–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pradhan AK, Konda RB, Mustafa H, Mundle R, Bamiduro O, Roy UN, Cui Y, Burger A (2008) Surface plasmon resonance in CdSe semiconductor coated with gold nanoparticles. Opt Express 16(9):6202.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.006202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaadt DM, Feng B, Yu ET (2005) Enhanced semiconductor optical absorption via surface plasmon excitation in metal nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 86(6):063106.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1855423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okamoto K, Niki I, Shvartser A, Narukawa Y, Mukai T, Scherer A (2004) Surface-plasmon-enhanced light emitters based on InGaN quantum wells. Nat Mater 3(9):601–605.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu J, Makableh YFM, Vasan R, Manasreh MO, Liang B, Reyner CJ, Huffaker DL (2012) Strong interband transitions in InAs quantum dots solar cell. Appl Phys Lett 100(5):051907.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3681360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arinze ES, Qiu B, Nyirjesy G, Thon SM (2016) Plasmonic nanoparticle enhancement of solution-processed solar cells: practical limits and opportunities. ACS Photon 3(2):158–173.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steckel AJ, Chen P, Cao X, Jackson HE, Kumar M, Boyd JT (1995) GaAs quantum well distributed Bragg reflection laser with AlGaAs/GaAs superlattice gratings fabricated by focused ion beam mixing. Appl Phys Lett 67(2):179–181.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.114659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edwards GT, Sobiesierski A, Westwood DI, Smowton PM (2007) Fabrication of high-aspect-ratio, sub-micron gratings in AlGaInP/GaAs laser structures using a BCl3/Cl2/Ar inductively coupled plasma. Semicond Sci Technol 22:1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montes M, Hierro A, Ulloa JM, Guzmán A, Damilano B, Hugues M, Khalfioui MA, Duboz J-Y, Massies J (2008) Analysis of the characteristic temperatures of (Ga,In)(N,As)/GaAs laser diodes. J Phys D 41(15):155102.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/15/155102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okamoto K, Scherer A, Kawakami Y (2008) Surface plasmon enhanced light emission from semiconductor materials. Phys Stat Sol (c) 5(9):2822–2824.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200779287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okamoto K, Niki I, Shvartser A, Narukawa Y, Mukai T, Scherer A (2005) Surface-plasmon-enhanced light emitters based on InGaN quantum wells. Phys Stat Sol (c) 2(7):2841–2844.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200461540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pavelescu E-M, Gilfert C, Reithmaier JP, Martin-Minguez A, Esquivias I (2008) GaInAs/(Al)GaAs quantum-dot lasers with high wavelength stability, Semicond Sci Technol. 23:085022 1–4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fan L, Hessenius C, Fallahi M, Hader J, Li H, Moloney J, Stolz W, Koch SW (2008) Highly strained InGaAs/GaAs vertical-external-cavity surface-emitting laser for the generation of coherent yellow-orange light. Solid State Lasers XVII 6871:87119Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iga K (2008) Vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser: its conception and evolution. Jpn J Appl Phys 47(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Link S, El-Sayed MA (1999) Size and temperature dependence of the plasmon absorption of colloidal gold nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 103(21):4212–4217.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984796o CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fox M (2001) Optical properties of solids. Oxford University Press, New York Chapter 2,7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maier SA (2007) Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications. Springer, New York, pp 21–38Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou X, Wei Q, Wang L, Joshi B, Wei Q, Sun K (2009) Enhanced photoluminescence from gallium arsenide semiconductor coated with au nanoparticles. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 96(3):637–641.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5277-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shalaev VM (2007) Optical negative-index metamaterials. Nat Photonics 1:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knight MW, Wu Y, Lassiter JB, Nordlander P, Halas NJ (2009) Substrates matter: influence of an adjacent dielectric on an individual plasmonic nanoparticles. Nano Lett 9(5):2188–2192.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl900945q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prodan E, Radloff C, Halas NJ, Nordlander P (2003) A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures. Science 302(5644):419–422.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    García de Abajo FJ, Kociak M (2008) Probing the photonic local density of states with electron energy loss spectroscopy. PRL 100(10):106804.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.106804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dulkeith E, Niedereichholz T, Klar TA, Feldmann J (2004) Plasmon emission in photoexcited gold nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 70:205424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Joulain C, Mulet G (2003) Definition and measurement of the local density of electromagnetic states close to an interface. PRB 68(24):245405.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qi Hong W (1989) Extraction of extinction coefficient of weak absorbing thin films from special absorption. J Phys D Appl Phys 22(9):1384–1385.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/22/9/024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Russel Raj K, Murugakoothan P (2012) Studies on the optical and mechanical properties of non-linear optical 3-aminophenol orthophosphoric acid (3-amphph) single crystal. Optik-Int J Light Electron Opt 123(12):1082–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lance Kelly K, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC (2003) The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 107(3):668–677.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026731y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Adhikary S, Halder N, Chakrabarti S, Majumdar S, Ray SK, Herrera M, Bonds M, Browning ND (2010) Investigation of strain in self-assembled multilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dot heterostructures. J Cryst Growth 312(5):724–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.11.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nuntawong N, Birudavolu S, Hains CP, Huang S, Xu H, Huffaker DL (2004) Effect of strain-compensation in stacked 1.3μm InAs∕GaAs quantum dot active regions grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 85(15):3050–3052.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1805707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swaminathan V, Macramder AT (1991) Material aspects of GaAs and InP based structures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 80–92Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reich S, Goni AR, Thomsen C, Heinrichsdorff F, Krost A, Bimberg D (1999) Raman scattering by optical phonons in a InAs/GaAs monolayer. Phys Stat Sol (b) 215(1):419–424.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(199909)215:1<419::AID-PSSB419>3.0.CO;2-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsai FY, Lee CP (1998) Single-photon emission from InGaAs quantum dots grown on (111) GaAs. J Appl Phys 84(5):2624–2627.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    De H, Walt A (1993) The physics of simple metal clusters: experimental aspects and simple models. Rev Mod Phys 65:611–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhou C, Yu J, Qin Y, Zheng J (2012) Grain size effects in polycrystalline gold nanoparticles. Nano 4:4228–4233Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kobrinsky MJ, Thompson CV (2000) Activation volume for inelastic deformation in polycrystalline Ag thin films. Acta Mater 48(3):625–633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00403-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chang CC, Sharma YD, Kim Y-S, Bur JA, Shenoi RV, Krishna S, Huang D, Lin S-Y (2010) A surface plasmon enhanced infrared photodetector based on InAs quantum dots. Nano Lett 10(5):1704–1709.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl100081j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Adhikary S, Aytac Y, Meesala S, Wolde S, Perera AGU, Chakrabarti S (2012) A multicolor, broadband (5–20 μm), quaternary-capped InAs/GaAs quantum dot infrared photodetector. Appl Phys Lett 101(26):261114.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sengupta S, Kim JO, Barve AV, Adhikary S, Sharma YD, Gautam N, Lee SJ, Noh SK, Chakrabarti S, Krishna S (2012) Sub-monolayer quantum dots in confinement enhanced dots-in-a-well heterostructure. Appl Phys Lett 100:261111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chakrabarti S, Stiff-Roberts AD, Bhattacharya P, Kennerly SW (2004) High responsivity AlAs/InAs/GaAs superlattice quantum dot infrared photodetector. J Electron Lett 40(3):197–198.  https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20040136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lavi Tyagi
    • 1
  • S. Chakrabarti
    • 2
  • S. K. Pandey
    • 2
  • P. Shete
    • 2
  • H. Rawool
    • 2
  • Debiprasad Panda
    • 2
  • H. Ghadi
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Research in Nanotechnology and ScienceIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Center for Nanoelectronics, Department of Electrical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations