, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 1313–1321 | Cite as

Multiband Metamaterial Absorber Design Based on Plasmonic Resonances for Solar Energy Harvesting

  • Batuhan Mulla
  • Cumali SabahEmail author


A new metamaterial absorber is designed and characterized numerically for the harvesting of solar energy. The design is composed of three layers in which the interaction among them gives rise to the plasmonic resonances. The main operation frequency range of the proposed structure is chosen to be the visible regime. However, the design is also analyzed for the infrared and ultraviolet regimes. In order to characterize the absorber, some parametric studies with respect to the dimensions of the structure are carried out. According to the results, it is found that the proposed metamaterial absorber has 98.2 % absorption capability at 445.85 THz and 99.4 % absorption capability between 624 and 658.3 THz. Moreover, the polarization dependency of the structure is examined and it is found that the design operates well as a perfect absorber with polarization independency for the studied frequency range. As a result, the proposed metamaterial absorber can be used for solar energy harvesting as it provides multiple perfect absorption bands in the visible regime.


Metamaterial Perfect absorption Multiband Solar energy Energy harvesting 



The work reported here was carried out at Middle East Technical University—Northern Cyprus Campus (METU-NCC). It is supported by METU-NCC under the grant number of BAP-FEN-15-D-3.


  1. 1.
    Ziolkowski RW (2003) Design, fabrication, and testing of double negative metamaterials. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 51:1516–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engheta N, Ziolkowski RW (2005) A positive future for double-negative metamaterials. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 53:1535–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu Z, Liu S, Fang C, Huang X, Yang H (2015) Design, simulation, and fabrication of single-/dual-/triple band metamaterial absorber. Phys Scr 90:065501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li W, Zhou X, Ying Y, Qiao X, Qin F, Li Q, Che S (2015) Polarization-insensitive wide-angle multiband metamaterial absorber with a double layer modified electric ring resonator array. AIP Advances 5:067151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dincer F, Karaaslan M, Unal E, Delihacioglu K, Sabah C (2014) Design of polarization and incident angle insensitive dual-band metamaterial absorber based on isotropic resonator. Prog Electromagn Res 144:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He X, Yan S, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Jia P, Wu F, Jiang J (2015) Broadband and polarization-insensitive terahertz absorber based on multilayer metamaterials. Opt Commun 340:44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang B, Zhai X, Wang G, Huang W, Wang L (2015) Frequency tunable metamaterial absorber at deep-subwavelength scale. Opt Mater Express 5:227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cong L, Tan S, Yahiaoui R, Yan F, Zhang W, Singh R (2015) Experimental demonstration of ultrasensitive sensing with terahertz metamaterial absorbers: a comparison with the metasurfaces. Appl Phys Lett 106:031107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ayas S, Bakan G, Dana A (2015) Rounding corners of nano-square patches for multispectral plasmonic metamaterial absorbers. Opt Express 23:11763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang H, Wang L (2013) Perfect selective metamaterial solar absorbers. Opt Express 21:A1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mulla B, Sabah C (2015) Perfect metamaterial absorber design for solar cell applications. Waves Random Complex Media 25:382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Díaz-Rubio A, Hibbins AP, Carbonell J, Sánchez-Dehesa J (2015) Experimental verification of total absorption by a low-loss thin dielectric layer. Appl Phys Lett 106:241604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR (2006) Controlling electromagnetic fields. Sci 312:1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai W, Genov DA, Shalaev VM (2005) Superlens based on metal-dielectric composites. Phys Rev B 72:193101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Padilla WJ (2008) Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 100:207402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Almoneef TS, Ramahi OM (2015) Metamaterial electromagnetic energy harvester with near unity efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 106:153902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dayal G, Ramakrishna SA (2013) Design of multi-band metamaterial perfect absorbers with stacked metal–dielectric disks. J Opt 15:055106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rufangura P, Sabah C (2015) Dual-band perfect metamaterial absorber for solar cell applications. Vacumm 120:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maier T, Brueckl H Microbolometers for the mid infra-red. Opt. Lett 35:3766Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu N, Mesch M, Weiss T, Hentschel M, Giessen H (2010) Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor. Nano Lett 10:2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu C, Neuner B III, John J, Milder A, Zollars B, Savoy S, Shvets G (2012) Metamaterial-based integrated plasmonic absorber/emitter for solar thermo-photovoltaic systems. J Opt 14:024005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cui Y, He Y, Jin Y, Ding F, Yang L, Ye Y, Zhong S, Lin Y, He S (2014) Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers. Laser Photonics Rev 8:495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang L, Chen H-T (2013) A, Brief review on terahertz metamaterial perfect absorbers THz. Sci Tech 6:26Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang J, Fan C, Ding P, He J, Cheng Y, Hu W, Cai G, Liang E, Xue Q (2012) Tunable broad-band perfect absorber by exciting of multiple plasmon resonances at optical frequency. Opt Express 20:14871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watts CM, Liu X, Padilla WJ (2012) Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers. Adv Mater 24:OP98Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Corey Shemelya, Dante DeMeo, Nicole Pfiester Latham, Xueyuan Wu, Chris Bingham,Willie Padilla, and Thomas E. VanderveldeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boriskina SV, Ghasemi H, Chen G (2013) Plasmonic materials for energy: from physics to applications. Mater Today 16:376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu K, Jiang S, Ji D, Xie Z, Zhang N, Song H, Xu Y, Gan Q (2015) Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 27:1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liang Q, Yu W, Zhao W, Wang T, Zhao J, Zhang H, Tao S (2013) Numerical study of the meta-nanopyramid array as efficient solar energy absorber. Opt Mater Express 3:1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jun Wu, Changhe Zhou, Junjie Yu, Hongchao Cao Shubin Li, Wei Jia (2014) TE polarization selective absorber based on metal-dielectric grating structure for infrared frequencies. Opt commun 329:3831. E. D Palik. Handbook of optical constant of solids. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1985Google Scholar
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Huang L, Chen H (2011) Multi-band and polarizatıon insensitive metamaterial absorber. Prog electromagn Res 113:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee H-M, Lee HS (2013) A metamaterıal based microwave absorber composed of coplanar electrıc-field-coupled resonator and wire array. Prog Electromagn Res C 34:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang JF, Qu SB, Fu ZT, Ma H, Yang YM, Wu X (2009) Three-dimensıonal metamaterial microwave absorbers composed of coplanar magnetic and electric resonators. Prog Electromagn Res 7:24Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dincer F, Karaaslan M, Unal E, Akgol O, Sabah C (2014) Design of polarization- and incident angle-independent perfect metamaterial absorber with interference theory. J Electron Mater 43:3949CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Environment and Energy DepartmentMiddle East Technical University—Northern Cyprus CampusTRNC / MersinTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringMiddle East Technical University—Northern Cyprus CampusTRNC / MersinTurkey

Personalised recommendations