Advertisement

Plasmonics

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 411–416 | Cite as

Optical Properties of Silver Hollow Triangular Nanoprisms

  • Zhongyue ZhangEmail author
  • Suying Zhang
  • Zuhong Xiong
Article

Abstract

The extinction spectra and electric field distributions of hollow triangular nanoprisms are calculated using the discrete dipole approximation method and compared with those of the solid triangular nanoprisms. When light propagates along the prisms, the main plasmon peaks of hollow triangular nanoprisms red shift compared with those of the solid triangular nanoprisms. At the main plasmon peaks, the hollow triangular nanoprisms provide more hot spots than the solid triangular nanoprisms. Therefore, the hollow triangular nanoprisms are more surface-enhanced Raman scattering active than the solid triangular prisms and can be used to detect small amount of molecules. For the hollow triangular nanoprism, although the local electric field distribution extremely relates to the incident polarization, the extinction spectra are independent of the incident polarization. In addition, the main plasmon peaks red shift linearly with the edge length, while they blue shift exponentially with the increase of the thickness of the hollow triangular nanoprisms. These results could be used to engineer hollow triangular nanoprisms for specific plasmonic applications.

Keywords

Optical property Silver Hollow triangular nanoprism Discrete dipole approximation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10974157), the Fundamental Research Founds for the Central Universities (XDJK2009C078, XDJK2009A001), and the Southwest University Research Foundation (SWU109024).

References

  1. 1.
    Vo-Dinh T (1998) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy using metallic nanostructures. Trends Anal Chem 17(8):557–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tian ZQ, Ren B, Wu DY (2002) Surface-enhanced raman scattering: from noble to transition metals and from rough surface to ordered nanostructures. J Phys Chem B 106(37):9463–9483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campion A, Kambhampati P (1998) Surface enhanced Raman scattering. Chem Soc Rev 27(4):241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC (2003) The optical properties of metal nanopaticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 107(3):668–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Z-Y, Zhao Y-P (2006) Tuning the optical absorption properties of Ag nanorods by their topologic shapes: a discrete dipole approximation calculation. Appl Phys Lett 89(2):023110–023112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu S, Zhou W (2009) Effect of gold coating on sensitivity of Rhombic silver nanostructure array. Plasmonics 4:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shuford KL, Rater MA, Schatz GC (2005) Multipolar excitation in triangular nanoprisms. J Chem Phys 123(11):114713–114721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu Y, Liu GL, Kim J, Mejia YX, Lee LP (2005) Nanophotonic crescent moon structures with sharp edge for ultrasensitive biomolecular detection by local electromagnetic field enhancement effect. Nano Lett 5(1):119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Z-Y, Zhao Y-P (2008) Optical properties of U-shaped Ag nanostructures. J Phys-Condens Mat 20(34):345223–345229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grand J, Adam P-M, Grimault AS, Vial A, De la Chapelle ML, Bijeon JL, Kostcheev S, Royer P (2006) Optical extinction spectroscopy of oblate, prolate and ellipsoid shaped gold nanoparticles: experiments and theory. Plasmonics 1(2–4):135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Billot L, Chapelle ML, Grimault A-S, Vial A, Barchiest D, Bijeon J-L, Adam P-M, Royer P (2006) Surface enhanced Raman scattering on gold nanowire arrays: evidence of strong multipolar surface plasmon resonance enhancement. Chem Phys Lett 422(4):303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gunnarsson L, Bjerneld EJ, Xu H, Petronis S, Kasemo B, Kall M (2001) Interparticle coupling effects in nanofabricated substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Appl Phys Lett 78(6):802–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haynes CL, McFarland AD, Zhao LL, Van Duyne RP, Schatz GC (2003) Nanoparticle optics: the importance of radiative dipole coupling in two-dimensional nanoparticle arrays. J Phys Chem B 107(30):7337–7342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Draine BT, Flatau PJ (1994) Discrete dipole approximation for scattering calculations. J Opt Soc Am A 11(4):1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Draine BT (1988) The discrete dipole approximation and its application to interstellar graphite grains. Astrophys J 333:848–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jensen TR, Duval ML, Kelly L, Lazarides A, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP (1999) Electrodynamics of noble metal nanoparticles and nanoparticle clusters. J Phys Chem B 103(45)9846–:9853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson PB, Christy RW (1972) Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 6(12):4370–4379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Felidj NJ, Aubard J, Levi G (1999) Discrete dipole approximation for ultraviolet-visible extinction spectra simulation of silver and gold colloids. J Chem Phys 111(3):1195–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Link S, Mohamed MB, Sayed MA (1999) Simulation of the optical absorption spectra of gold nanorods as a function of their aspect ratio and the effect of the medium dielectric constant. J Phys Chem B 103(16):3073–3077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krenn JR, Schider G, Rechberger W, Lamprecht B, Leitner A (2000) Design of multipolar plasmon excitations in silver nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 77(21):3379–3381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Experimental Animal Center of Shandong ProvinceJinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations