Frontiers of Physics

, 13:130309 | Cite as

Quantifying the quantumness of ensembles via unitary similarity invariant norms

Research article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The quantification of the quantumness of a quantum ensemble has theoretical and practical significance in quantum information theory. We propose herein a class of measures of the quantumness of quantum ensembles using the unitary similarity invariant norms of the commutators of the constituent density operators of an ensemble. Rigorous proof shows that they share desirable properties for a measure of quantumness, such as positivity, unitary invariance, concavity under probabilistic union, convexity under state decomposition, decreasing under coarse graining, and increasing under fine graining. Several specific examples illustrate the applications of these measures of quantumness in studying quantum information.

Keywords

the quantumness of quantum ensemble measures of quantumness of quantum ensembles unitary similarity invariant norms 

PACS numbers

03.67.Mn 03.65.Ud 03.67.-a 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11371005 and 11475054 and the Hebei Natural Science Foundation under Grant Nos. A2016205145 and A2018205125.

References

  1. 1.
    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Diósi, A Short Course in Quantum Information Theory: An Approach from Theoretical Physics, 2nd Ed., Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Massar and S. Popescu, Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(8), 1259 (1995)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. A. Fuchs, Just two nonorthogonal quantum states, Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement 2, 11–16, Boston: Springer, 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. A. Fuchs and M. Sasaki, Squeezing quantum information through a classical channel: Measuring the quantumness of a set of quantum states, Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 377 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. A. Fuchs and M. Sasaki, The quantumness of a set of quantum states, arXiv: quant-ph/0302108Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, and M. Piani, Quantumness of ensemble from no-broadcasting principle, Int. J. Quant. Inf. 04(01), 105 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Oreshkov and J. Calsamiglia, Distinguishability measures between ensembles of quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 79(3), 032336 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    X. Zhu, S. Pang, S. Wu, and Q. Liu, The classicality and quantumness of a quantum ensemble, Phys. Lett. A 375(18), 1855 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Ma, M. J. Zhao, Y. K. Wang, and S. M. Fei, Noncommutativity and local indistinguishability of quantum states, Sci. Rep. 4, 6336 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Luo, N. Li, and X. Cao, Relative entropy between quantum ensembles, Period. Math. Hung. 59(2), 223 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Luo, N. Li, and W. Sun, How quantum is a quantum ensemble, Quantum Inform. Process. 9(6), 711 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Luo, N. Li, and S. Fu, Quantumness of quantum ensembles, Theor. Math. Phys. 169(3), 1724 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Li, S. Luo, and Y. Mao, Quantifying the quantumness of ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 96(2), 022132 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Dakić, V. Vedral, and Č. Brukner, Necessary and sufficient condition for nonzero quantum discord, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(19), 190502 (2010)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Luo and S. Fu, Measurement-induced nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(12), 120401 (2011)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. L. Hu and H. Fan, Measurement-induced nonlocality based on trace norm, New J. hys. 17(3), 033004 (2015)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. Zhan, Matrix Theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol. 147, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2013Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Peng, Y. Jiang, and H. Fan, Maximally coherent states and coherence-preserving operations, Phys. Rev. A 93(3), 032326 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantifying coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(14), 140401 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    X. Yuan, H. Zhou, Z. Cao, and X. Ma, Intrinsic randomness as a measure of quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A 92(2), 022124 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    X. F. Qi, T. Gao, and F. L. Yan, Measuring coherence with entanglement concurrence, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 50(28), 285301 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(26), 5022 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(10), 2245 (1998)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Quantum discord: A measure of the quantumness of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1), 017901 (2001)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Henderson and V. Vedral, Classical, quantum and total correlations, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 34(35), 6899 (2001)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mathematics and Information ScienceHebei Normal UniversityShijiazhuangChina
  2. 2.College of Physics Science and Information EngineeringHebei Normal UniversityShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations