Abstract
The concept of junzi is the central issue in the Zhongyong, one of the most important Confucian books. A junzi leads a life starting with the original disposition of cheng 诚(being truthful to the real self). This paper analyzes the disposition of cheng to reveal two kinds of good in human existence, that is, the natural good, which is present in cheng; and the idea of good, which is a conceptualization of the natural good. The natural good is actually equal to the nature endowed by the Tian, and so it is primary and absolute. Meanwhile, the idea of good is secondary and can be improved by self-cultivation. The distinction and interaction between these two kinds of good are crucial in conceiving the concept of junzi. Yet, the distinction is so subtle that it often confuses people in self-cultivation. In fact, people in their actual lives may mix them up and perceive only the idea of good. We call this the junzi impasse. The Zhongyong does not offer enough discussion about this impasse. Since this confusion may cause the termination of self-cultivation, this paper offers a comparative discussion in the light of Christian guilty consciousness, and attempts to propose a solution to the junzi impasse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cai Sigui (1983). “Lun Wang Fuzhi de ‘Cheng’” 论王夫之的“诚” (“On Wang Fuzhi’s Concept of Cheng”). Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao, (2): 53–60
Chen Lisheng (2005). “’Liangzhi’ yu ‘Zhongzi’: Wang Yangming Sixiang zhizhong de Zhiwu Yinyu” “’良知’与’种子’: 王阳明思想之中的植物隐喻” (“Conscience and Seed: Wang Yangming’s Analogy of Plant”). Jiangsu Xingzheng Xueyuan Xuebao, (5): 11–15
Legge, J. (2001). The Chinese Classics, Vol. I. Harbor, FL: Simon Publications
Shu Jincheng (1984). “Wang Fuzhi Lun ‘Cheng’” 王夫之论“诚” (“Wang Fuzhi on Cheng”). Chuanshan Xuekan, (2): 17–21
Tang Taixiang (2006). “Zhongyong zhi Dao zhi Wo Jian” 中庸之道之我见 (“My Understanding on the Dao of Zhongyong”). Anhui Shangmao Zhiye Jishu Xueyuan Xuebao, (5): 12–14
Wang Fuzhi (2006). Shangshu Yinyi 尚书引义 (Elaboration on the Meaning of the Book of Documents), Vol. III. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Wang Yangming (2008). Wang Yangming Xuanji 王阳明选集 (Selections of Wang Yangming). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Wu Fanming (2000). “Zhongyong Cheng Shuo Tanxi” «中庸»诚说探析 (“An Analysis of the Concept of Cheng in the Zhongyong”). Hunan Daxue Xuebao, 14(4): 16–20
Xie Wenyu (2007). “Endian Zhenli Lun” 恩典真理论 (“The Concept of Redemptive Truth”). Zhexue Men, 8(1): 61–91
Xue Jiyi (2001). “Wang Fuzhi ‘Cheng-Shiyou’ Fanchou de Zhudao Hanyi” 王夫之“诚-实 有”范畴的主导涵义 (“Meanings of Wang Fuzhi’s Cheng-Reality”). Qilu Xuekan, (3): 120–123
Zhou Dunyi (1990). Zhou Dunyi Quanji 周敦颐全集 (The Collection of Zhou Dunyi). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Zhou Guiqin (2008). “Lun Zhuxi ‘Gewu Zhizhi’ Shuo de Renshilun Jiazhi” 论朱熹“格物致 知”说的认识论价值 (“On the Epistemological Value of Zhu Xi’s Investigating Things and Extending Knowledge”). Jingji yu Shehui Fazhan, 6(6): 70–72
Zhang Hongbo (2007). “Zhongyong zhi ‘Cheng’ Fanchou Kaobian” «中庸»之“诚”范畴 考辨 (“A Categorical Analysis of Cheng in the Zhongyong). Wuhan Daxue Xuebao, 60(4): 615–619
Zhu Xi (1983). “Daxue Zhangju Jizhu” 大学章句集注 (“Chapters and Sentences of the Great Learning with Notes”). Sishu Zhangju Jizhu 四书章句集注 (Chapters and Sentences of the Four Books with Notes). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, W. The concept of Junzi in the Zhongyong . Front. Philos. China 6, 501–520 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0153-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0153-3