“Justice is happiness”?—An analysis of Plato’s strategies in response to challenges from the sophists

Research Article

Abstract

The challenge from the sophists with whom Plato is confronted is: Who can prove that the just man without power is happy whereas the unjust man with power is not? This challenge concerns the basic issue of politics: the relationship between justice and happiness. Will the unjust man gain the exceptional “happiness of the strong” by abusing his power and by injustice? The gist of Plato’s reply is to speak not of “justice” but of “intrinsic justice,” i.e., the strength of virtue which, in his account, is the fundamental good of man. Nevertheless, many contend that intrinsic justice is actually injustice, for the division of power in the state is undemocratic while in the soul, the suppression of desire by the reason. Plato’s advocacy of hierarchical, elite political system has enraged democrats, while his idea of “philosopher king” has enraged the aristocrats as well. So, who will appreciate Plato’s effort?

Keywords

justice happiness politics of the strong 

References

  1. Adkin, A. W. H. (1960). Merit and Responsibility, A Study in Greek Values. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Annas, J. (1995). Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca and London: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Limin (2010). A Critical History of Classical Political Philosophy. Beijing: Renmin ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, A. (2003). The Ladder of Love, Plato’s Symposium, trans. by Liu Xiaofeng et. al. Beijing: Huaxia ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukuyama, F. (2003). The End of History (Chinese Edition). Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  6. Irwin, T. (1995). Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nussbaum, M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Saunders, T. J. (1991). Plato’s Penal Code: Tradition, Controversy, and Reform in Greek Penology. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Strauss, L. (1964). The City and Man. Chicago: Rand McNally & CompanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations