Advertisement

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 424–437 | Cite as

Is scientific research driven by opportunity, problems, or observations?

Research Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

With the recent rise of the philosophy of scientific practices, SSK (Sociology of Scientific Knowledge), and feminist approaches to the philosophy of science, a new perspective is gradually coming into being, holding that the starting point for scientific research is opportunity. Opportunistic features in solar neutrino experiments, Opportunistic features of complexity studies emerging from economics, and the measurement of insects’ flight can prove the above perspective from different angels. It is important and significant to determine whether the starting point for scientific research is opportunity, a problem, or an observation.

Keywords

scientific research starting point opportunity problem observation 

摘要

近年来由于科学实践哲学的兴起, 以及SSK和女性主义科学哲学研究的兴起, 科学研究始于机会的观点正在悄然形成之中。 太阳中微子实验、 复杂性研究和昆虫飞行测量等案例都从不同角度证明了“科学研究始于机会”的观点。 区别科学研究“始于机会”、 “始于问题”和“始于观察”这三种观点, 是重要而且有意义的。

关键词

科学研究 起点 机会 问题 观察 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cai Zhijian (2005). Jiyu Cichang Chuangan Xianquan de Kunchong Feixing Genzong Celiang Xitong 基于磁场传感线圈的昆虫飞行跟踪测量系统 (Tracking and Measuring System for Flying Insects based on Magnetic Sensing Coil). PhD Dissertation, Tsinghua UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life, the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row PublishersGoogle Scholar
  7. Reichenbach, H. (1963). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power, Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca and London: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Waldrop, M. Mitchell (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang Yanfeng (2005). Pikelin Kexue Jiangoulun Yanjiu 皮克林科学建构论研究 (Studies on Pickering’s Scientific Constructivism). PhD Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Science, Technology and Society, School of Humanities and Social SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations