Skip to main content
Log in

What is “the ineffable” exactly?

An extensive reading of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Abstract

“The ineffable” in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is an essential term that has various interpretations. It could be divided into two types, namely, positive and negative, or real and fake. The negative or fake type can be clarified by logical analysis, while the positive or real type can be understood only through philosophical critique. Both the positive and negative types consist of infinity or absoluteness, but the infinity is subject to distinctions in meaning and logic.

摘要

“不可说”在维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》里是一个有多重解释的重要术语, 可分为两种类型, 即积极的与消极的, 或真实的与虚假的。 消极的或虚假的可以通过逻辑分析进行澄清, 而积极的或真实的只有通过哲学的批判才能加以理解。 消极的与积极的类型均由无限或绝对构成, 但二者的无限在意义和逻辑方面存在差别。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Han Donghui (2003). Lun Shizhengzhuyi De Xingershangxue 论实证主义的形而上学 (On the metaphysics of positivism). Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Xuebao 中国人民大学学报 (Journal of Renmin University of China), (1): 76–81

  • Kant I (1997). Critique of Pure Reason (trans., Guyer P and Wood A W). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1972). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: The German Text of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung (trans., McGuinness B and Pears D F). 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Hong.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Researches), 2005, (8): 64–68

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Han, D. What is “the ineffable” exactly?. Front. Philos. China 2, 402–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0025-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0025-z

Keywords

关键词

Navigation