Advertisement

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 291–307 | Cite as

Confucius and Aristotle on friendship: A comparative study

  • He Yuanguo 
Comparative Studies

Abstract

Before and during the times of Confucius and Aristotle, the concept of friendship had very different implications. This paper compares Confucius’ with Aristotle’s thoughts on friendship from two perspectives: xin 信 (fidelity, faithfulness) and le 乐 (joy). The Analects emphasizes the xin as the basis of friendship. Aristotle holds that there are three kinds of friends and corresponding to them are three types of friendship. In the friendship for the sake of pleasure, there is no xin; in the legal form of friendship for the sake of utility, xin is guaranteed by law; and in the moral form of friendship for the sake of utility, xin is guaranteed by morality; in the friendship for the sake of virtue, xin is an indispensable part. Both thinkers believe friends can bring joy to human life. According to Confucius, it is the joy of rendao 仁道 (benevolence), whereas for Aristotle, it is the joy of Reason. There are many commonalities and differences between the two. The commonalities reveal some inner links between Confucian rendao and Aristotelian Reason. It seems that the differences between rendao and Reason are the differences between moral reason and logical reason. The comparative study is helpful for us to understand the two masters’ ethics, politics and philosophy.

Keywords

comparative philosophy Confucius Aristotle friend you ren Philia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes J, ed (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Lau D C (Trans.) (1992). The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Li Dingzuo (1984). Zhouyi jijie 周易集解 (Collected Commentaries on Zhouyi), Vol. 11. Beijing: Zhonghua Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu Baonan (1990). Lunyu zheng yi 论语正义 (A Commentary on The Analects). Beijing: Zhonghua Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu Jiahe (1997). Gudai Zhongguo yu shijie 古代中国与世界 (Ancient China and World). Wuhan: Wuhan Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu Jiahe (2003). On the Growth of the Historical Reason in Ancient China. Shixue lilun yanjiu 史学理论研究 (Studies on Historical Theory), (2): 18–31, 158Google Scholar
  7. Percival G (1940). Aristotle on Friendship: Being an Expanded Translation of the Nicomachean Ethics Book VIII & IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Qian Mu (2002). Lunyu xin jie 论语新解 (A New Commentary on The Analects). Beijing: San Lian Bookstore Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  9. Rackham H (1934). The Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruan Yuan, ed (1997). Shisanjing zhushu 十三经注疏 (A Commentary on Confucian Thirteen Classics). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang Niansun (1983). Guangya shuzheng 广雅疏证 (A Commentary on Guangya). Beijing: Zhonghua Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Xu Shen (1963). shuowen jiezi 说文解字 (Explaining Wimple and Analyzing Compound Characters). Beijing: Zhonghua Book CompanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of History and CultureHubei UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations