Abstract
The more diverse cultures and values a country perceives to be “normal” even “just”, the more it needs to search for a public philosophy. Having developed only recently, China, which is speedily progressing towards a market economy, can be considered this kind of country. This article takes Daniel Bell’s concept of modern society and public household as the basis for expatiating on some chief problems and the ways to solve them. It pays special attention to investigating the public ethic while probing public philosophy, and it argues that the public ethic is an ethic that deals with public affairs in the public realm, especially the social political realm; with respect to all people involved, it is a common ethic or an ethic with openness. It is also an ethic that appeals to public opinion and public reason, and tries to find consensus from the demands of different values. Furthermore, because it refers to fundamental public benefits, it has to be a normative ethic of universalism and of baseline holders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell D (1976). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books, xi, 253, 255, 256
Liang Qichao (1994). Xinmin Shuo 新民说 (New People). Shenyang: Liaoning People Press, 16
Liu Shipei (1997). Liu Shipei Quanji 刘师培全集 (Liu Shipei’s Collected Edition). 4th ed. Beijing: CCPS Press, 156
Rousseau J J (2003). The Social Contract. (in Chinese, trans. He Zhaowu). Beijing: The Commercial Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by Su Jing from Zhexue Dongtai 哲学动态 (Philosophical Trends), 2005, (8): 3–8
About this article
Cite this article
He, H. Investigations on public philosophy. Front. Philos. China 2, 84–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0005-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0005-3