Skip to main content
Log in

Tracked robot with underactuated tension-driven RRP transformable mechanism: ideas and design

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robots with transformable tracked mechanisms are widely used in complex terrains because of their high adaptability, and many studies on novel locomotion mechanisms have been conducted to make them able to climb higher obstacles. Developing underactuated transformable mechanisms for tracked robots could decrease the number of actuators used while maintaining the flexibility and obstacle-crossing capability of these robots, and increasing their cost performance. Therefore, the underactuated tracked robots have appreciable research potential. In this paper, a novel tracked robot with a newly proposed underactuated revolute–revolute–prismatic (RRP) transformable mechanism, which is inspired by the sit-up actions of humans, was developed. The newly proposed tracked robot has only two actuators installed on the track pulleys for moving and does not need extra actuators for transformations. Instead, it could concentrate the track belt’s tension toward one side, and the unbalanced tension would drive the linkage mechanisms to change its configuration. Through this method, the proposed underactuated design could change its external shape to create support points with the terrain and move its center of mass actively at the same time while climbing obstacles or crossing other kinds of terrains, thus greatly improving the climbing capability of the robot. The geometry and kinematic relationships of the robot and the crossing strategies for three kinds of typical obstacles are discussed. On the basis of such crossing motions, the parameters of links in the robot are designed to make sure the robot has sufficient stability while climbing obstacles. Terrain-crossing dynamic simulations were run and analyzed to prove the feasibility of the robot. A prototype was built and tested. Experiments show that the proposed robot could climb platforms with heights up to 33.3% of the robot’s length or cross gaps with widths up to 43.5% of the robot’s length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

COM:

Center of mass

DOF:

Degrees of freedom

RRP:

Revolute–revolute–prismatic

PWM:

Pulse-width modulation

UTMTR:

Underactuated tension-motivated tracked robot

a, b, γ :

Positions and postures of the UTMTR in the environment

A x, B x :

Intermediate variables, which shows the relationships between xcf and lT (or lTr)

A y, B y :

Intermediate variables, which shows the relationships between ycf and lT (or lTr)

l l, l 2 :

Lengths of Links l and 2, respectively

l 1m :

Distance between the center of rear pulley and COM of Link l

l 2m :

Distance between revolute joint B and COM of Link 2

l 3 :

Distance between revolute joint A and the axis of the front pulley

l 3m :

Distance between revolute joint A and COM of Link 3

l 4m :

Distance between the center of front pulley and COM of Link 4

l T :

Length of the tensioned segment of the track belt in steps 1–4

l T0 :

Initial value of lT

l Tr :

Length of the tensioned segment of the track belt in step 5, which is reversed with the ones in steps 1–4

l Y, l Z :

Intermediate variables for the convince of formulation

L :

Total length of the track belt

m fp, m rp :

Masses of front and rear pulley, respectively

m i, (i = 1,2,…,4):

Mass of Link i

p 0, p 1, p 2 :

Homogeneous coordinates of a support point under robot coordinates

p f0 :

Homogeneous coordinate of the front pulley’s center under the base coordinate of the robot

p G :

Homogeneous coordinate of a support point under ground coordinate

r :

Dividing radius of pulleys

R :

Transformation matrix between OR0 and ORi (i = 1,2)

R 01, R 12 :

Transformation matrixes between robot coordinate systems

R T :

Transformation matrix between the ground coordinate and the base coordinate of the robot

T front, T rear :

Driving torques of front and rear pulleys according to results of dynamic simulations, respectively

x cf, y cf :

Coordinate values of the front pulley’s center under the base coordinate of the robot in the x and y directions, respectively

x sp, y sp :

Coordinate values of the support point under robot coordinate in the x and y directions, respectively

X COM1 :

Distances between COM and the shaft of the rear pulley along the moving direction before climbing actions

X COM2 :

Distances between COM and the shaft of the rear pulley along the moving direction after climbing actions

ΔX COM :

Moving distance of COM while transforming

ω rear :

Angular speed of the rear pulley

θ A :

Revolve angle of revolute joint A

θ Acal, θ Bcal :

Revolving angles of revolute joints A and B according to calculation, respectively

θ Asim, θ Bsim :

Revolving angles of revolute joints A and B according to results of dynamic simulations, respectively

θ B :

Revolve angle of revolute joint B

θ lim :

Maximum value of θA

Δθ :

Two pulleys’ differential-rotate angle

Δθ (i = 1,3):

Values of Δθ at the end of step i

References

  1. Khurshid J, Bing-rong H. Military robots—a glimpse from today and tomorrow. In: Proceedings of ICARCV 2004 the 8th Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision Conference. Kunming: IEEE, 2004, 771–777

    Google Scholar 

  2. Budiharto W, Andreas V, Suroso J S, Gunawan A A S, Irwansyah E. Development of tank-based military robot and object tracker. In: Proceedings of 2019 the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Robot Systems. Nagoya: IEEE, 2019, 221–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W D, Dong W, Su Y Y, Wu D M, Du Z J. Development of search-and-rescue robots for underground coal mine applications. Journal of Field Robotics, 2014, 31(3): 386–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong P F, Wang X Z, Xing H J, Liu Y Q, Zhang M L. Design and control of a tracked robot for search and rescue in nuclear power plant. In: Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics. Macao: IEEE, 2016, 330–335

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Orita Y, Takaba K, Fukao T. Human tracking of a crawler robot in climbing stairs. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 2021, 33(6): 1338–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamiyama K, Miyaguchi M, Kato H, Tsumaki T, Omura K, Chiba T. Automatic inspection of embankment by crawler-type mobile robot. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Berlin: IAARC, 2018, 714–719

    Google Scholar 

  7. Verbiest R, Ruysen K, Vanwalleghem T, Demeester E, Kellens K. Automation and robotics in the cultivation of pome fruit: Where do we stand today? Journal of Field Robotics, 2021, 38(4): 513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McBride B, Longoria R, Krotkov E. Measurement and prediction of the off-road mobility of small, robotic ground vehicles. In: Measuring the Performance and Intelligence of Systems: Proceedings of the 2003 PerMIS Workshop NIST Special Publication. Gaithersburg: Citeseer, 2003, 405–412

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirose S. A study of design and control of a quadruped walking vehicle. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1984, 3(2): 113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altendorfer R, Moore N, Komsuoglu H, Buehler M, Brown H B, McMordie D, Saranli U, Full R, Koditschek D E. RHex: a biologically inspired hexapod runner. Autonomous Robots, 2001, 11(3): 207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakagami Y, Watanabe R, Aoyama C, Matsunaga S, Higaki N, Fujimura K. The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Lausanne: IEEE, 2002, 3: 2478–2483

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raibert M, Blankespoor K, Nelson G, Playter R. BigDog, the Rough-Terrain quadruped robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2008, 41(2): 10822–10825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang J Z, Jin Z L, Feng H B. Type synthesis of a 3-mixed-DOF protectable leg mechanism of a firefighting multi-legged robot based on GF set theory. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2018, 130: 567–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li L Q, Fang Y F, Guo S, Qu H B, Wang L. Type synthesis of a class of novel 3-DOF single-loop parallel leg mechanisms for walking robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, 145: 103695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shammas E, Wolf A, Choset H. Three degrees-of-freedom joint for spatial hyper-redundant robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2006, 41(2): 170–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright C, Johnson A, Peck A, McCord Z, Naaktgeboren A, Gianfortoni P, Gonzalez-Rivero M, Hatton R, Choset H. Design of a modular snake robot. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 2007, 2609–2614

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paskarbeit J, Beyer S, Gucze A, Schröder J, Wiltzok M, Fingberg M, Schneider A. OUROBOT—a self-propelled continuous-track-robot for rugged terrain. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Stockholm: IEEE, 2016, 4708–4713

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh D, Fu Q Y, Li C. SenSnake: a snake robot with contact force sensing for studying locomotion in complex 3-D terrain. In: Proceedings of 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Philadelphia: IEEE, 2022, 2068–2075

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pinto V H, Soares I N, Rocha M, Lima J, Gonçalves J, Costa P. Design, modeling, and control of an autonomous legged–wheeled hybrid robotic vehicle with non-rigid joints. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(13): 6116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mann M P, Damti L, Tirosh G, Zarrouk D. Minimally actuated serial robot. Robotica, 2018, 36(3): 408–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y F, Guo S, Li L Q, Niu L Z, Li X. Design of a novel side-mounted leg mechanism with high flexibility for a multi-mission quadruped earth rover BJTUBOT. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 18(2): 24

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagatani K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Tadakuma K, Koyanagi E. Development of leg-track hybrid locomotion to traverse loose slopes and irregular terrain. Journal of Field Robotics, 2011, 28(6): 950–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan N, Mohan R E, Elangovan K. Scorpio: a biomimetic reconfigurable rolling-crawling robot. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2016, 13(5): 1729881416658180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y H, Fei Y Q, Xu H W. Stability analysis of a wheel-track-leg hybrid mobile robot. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2018, 91(3–4): 515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujita T, Sasaki T. Development of hexapod tracked mobile robot and its hybrid locomotion with object-carrying. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics & Intelligent Sensors. Ottawa: IEEE, 2017, 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li J H, Wang J Z, Wang S K, Peng H, Wang B M, Qi W, Zhang L B, Su H. Parallel structure of six wheel-legged robot trajectory tracking control with heavy payload under uncertain physical interaction. Assembly Automation, 2020, 40(5): 675–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng H, Wang J Z, Wang S K, Shen W, Shi D W, Liu D C. Coordinated motion control for a wheel-leg robot with speed consensus strategy. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2020, 25(3): 1366–1376

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fu Q, Guan Y S, Liu S W, Zhu H F. A novel modular wheel-legged mobile robot with high mobility. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Sanya: IEEE, 2021, 577–582

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruzzone L, Baggetta M, Nodehi S E, Bilancia P, Fanghella P. Functional design of a hybrid leg-wheel-track ground mobile robot. Machines, 2021, 9(1): 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo W Z, Qiu J D, Xu X R, Wu J. TALBOT: a track-leg transformable robot. Sensors, 2022, 22(4): 1470

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bruzzone L, Quaglia G. Review article: locomotion systems for ground mobile robots in unstructured environments Mechanical Sciences, 2012, 3(2): 49–62

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen S C, Huang K J, Chen W H, Shen S Y, Li C H, Lin P C. Quattroped: a leg–wheel transformable robot. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(2): 730–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. She Y, Hurd C J, Su H J. A transformable wheel robot with a passive leg. In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Hamburg: IEEE, 2015, 4165–4170

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kim Y, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim J, Kim H S, Seo T W. STEP: a new mobile platform with 2-DOF transformable wheels for service robots. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2020, 25(4): 1859–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu Q W, Xu H, Xiong K, Zhou Q Q, Guo W Z. Design and analysis of a bi-directional transformable wheel robot trimode. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Prague: IEEE, 2021, 8396–8403

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee Y, Ryu S, Won J H, Kim S G, Kim H S, Seo T W. Modular two-degree-of-freedom transformable wheels capable of overcoming obstacle. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(2): 914–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamauchi B M. PackBot: a versatile platform for military robotics. Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2004, 5422: 228–237

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Arai M, Tanaka Y, Hirose S, Kuwahara H, Tsukui S. Development of “Souryu-IV” and “Souryu-V”: serially connected crawler vehicles for in-rubble searching operations. Journal of Field Robotics, 2008, 25(1–2): 31–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Paillat J L, Lucidarme P, Hardouin L. Original design of an unmanned ground vehicle for exploration in rough terrain. Advanced Robotics, 2010, 24(1–2): 255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luo Z R, Shang J Z, Wei G W, Ren L. A reconfigurable hybrid wheel-track mobile robot based on Watt II six-bar linkage. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2018, 128: 16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao Y T, Han B L, Luo Q S, Li K L. Design and implementation of four-link robot crawler with variable structure. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 428(1): 012060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zong C G, Ji Z J, Yu J Z, Yu H S. An angle-changeable tracked robot with human-robot interaction in unstructured environments. Assembly Automation, 2020, 40(4): 565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zarrouk D, Yehezkel L. Rising STAR, a highly reconfigurable sprawl tuned robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 1888–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Song Z, Luo Z R, Wei G W, Shang J Z. A portable six-wheeled mobile robot with reconfigurable body and self-adaptable obstacle-climbing mechanisms. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2022, 14(5): 051010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Choi D, Kim J R, Cho S, Jung S, Kim J. Rocker-Pillar: design of the rough terrain mobile robot platform with caterpillar tracks and rocker bogie mechanism. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Iilamoura-Algarve: IEEE, 2012, 3405–3410

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kim Y S, Jung G P, Kim H, Cho K J, Chu C N. Wheel transformer: a wheel-leg hybrid robot with passive transformable wheels. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2014, 30(6): 1487–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chinchkar D S, Gajghate S S, Panchal R N, Shetenawar R M, Mulik P S. Design of rocker bogie mechanism. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2017, 4(1): 46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kislassi T, Zarrouk D. A minimally actuated reconfigurable continuous track robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 652–659

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lim K, Ryu S, Won J H, Seo T W. A modified rocker-bogie mechanism with fewer actuators and high mobility. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(4): 8752–8758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wei C R, Wu J X, Sun J, Sun H Z, Yao Y A, Ruan Q. Reconfigurable design of a passive locomotion closed-chain multi-legged platform for terrain adaptability. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 174: 104936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Ma S G, Li B. Analysis of stairs-climbing ability for a tracked reconfigurable modular robot. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Safety, Security and Rescue Rototics, Workshop. Kobe: IEEE, 2005, 36–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. 2022JBZY026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, R., Liu, C. Tracked robot with underactuated tension-driven RRP transformable mechanism: ideas and design. Front. Mech. Eng. 19, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0777-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0777-8

Keywords

Navigation