Abstract
The internal force antagonism (IFA) problem is one of the most important issues limiting the applications and popularization of redundant parallel robots in industry. Redundant cable-driven parallel robots (RCDPRs) and redundant rigid parallel robots (RRPRs) behave very differently in this problem. To clarify the essence of IFA, this study first analyzes the causes and influencing factors of IFA. Next, an evaluation index for IFA is proposed, and its calculating algorithm is developed. Then, three graphical analysis methods based on this index are proposed. Finally, the performance of RCDPRs and RRPRs in IFA under three configurations are analyzed. Results show that RRPRs produce IFA in nearly all the areas of the workspace, whereas RCDPRs produce IFA in only some areas of the workspace, and the IFA in RCDPRs is milder than that RRPRs. Thus, RCDPRs more fault-tolerant and easier to control and thus more conducive for industrial application and popularization than RRPRs. Furthermore, the proposed analysis methods can be used for the configuration optimization design of RCDPRs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- IFA:
-
Internal force antagonism
- PID:
-
Proportion–integral–derivative
- RCDPR:
-
Redundant cable-driven parallel robot
- RRPR:
-
Redundant rigid parallel robot
- A i :
-
ith connection point between the linkage and the base
- a i :
-
Position vector of Ai in O
- B i :
-
ith connection point between the linkage and the moving platform
- O′ b i :
-
Position vector of Bi in O′
- C λ :
-
Initial value constants
- E :
-
Young’s modulus of the nylon material
- f 1, f 2 :
-
Tensions of the first and second cables, respectively
- f d :
-
Dynamic antagonistic force
- f s :
-
Static antagonistic force
- F :
-
External force
- G(s):
-
Transfer function
- G :
-
Gravity of the moving platform
- i :
-
Number of iterations
- i max :
-
Maximum number of iterations
- J :
-
Jacobian matrix of the parallel robots
- J − :
-
Inverse matrix of J
- J + :
-
Moore–Penrose pseudo-inverse matrix of J
- k 1, k 2 :
-
Stiffnesses of the first and second cables, respectively
- k D :
-
Differential parameters in PID control
- k I :
-
Integral parameters in PID control
- k max :
-
Maximum number of selections
- k p :
-
Proportional parameters in PID control
- L :
-
Length of the cable
- \({{\boldsymbol{\dot l}}}\) :
-
Velocity vector of the linkages
- l i :
-
Linkage vector from Bi to Ai
- m :
-
Number the linkages
- m 1, m 2 :
-
Masses of the first and second cables, respectively
- M :
-
Mass of the mass block
- n :
-
Degrees of freedom of the robot’s motion
- N ba :
-
Element in the bth row and ath column of N
- N :
-
Basis vector for the general solution of Eq. (8)
- N j :
-
jth column of N
- O :
-
Base coordinate system
- O′:
-
Moving coordinate system
- O m, O n :
-
m- and n-dimensional zero vectors, respectively
- p, ṗ :
-
Position and velocity vectors of the moving platform, respectively
- r :
-
Degree of redundancy of parallel robots
- R :
-
Radius of the cable
- R :
-
Rotation matrix of O′ relative to O
- s :
-
Micro elements of the transfer function
- S :
-
Second matrix after singular value decomposition of J
- t :
-
Time
- t i :
-
Value of the ith joint force
- t s1, t s2 :
-
First and second step time, respectively
- T sb :
-
bth element of Ts
- T :
-
Value of the ith joint force
- T (1) :
-
Initial joint force
- T last :
-
Value of T for the last iteration
- T s :
-
Special solution of the joint force
- u i :
-
Linkage unit vector
- U, V :
-
First and third matrices after singular value decomposition of J, respectively
- x 1, x 2 :
-
Displacements of the first and second cables, respectively
- x i :
-
Initial position of the mass block
- x m :
-
Displacement of the mass block
- x t :
-
Target position of the mass block
- x te1, x te2 :
-
First and second target positions with error, respectively
- x :
-
Pose of the moving platform
- ẋ :
-
Velocity vector of the moving platform
- ϕ :
-
Solution type
- η 1 :
-
Index 1 (the maximum value of the Euclidean norm number of T)
- η 2 :
-
Index 2 (the unit circle integral of ∥T∥max in the neighborhood of the coordinate [0, G])
- λ :
-
A random r-dimensional vector
- \(\lambda _a^{(i)}\) :
-
ath element of λ(i)
- \({\boldsymbol{\Theta }},\,{\boldsymbol{\dot \Theta }}\) :
-
Angular displacement and velocity vectors of the moving platform, respectively
- τ :
-
Update step
- Ω:
-
Output completion flag
References
Gosselin C, Schreiber L T. Redundancy in parallel mechanisms: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2018, 70(1): 010802
Wang Y H, Hou S H, Zhang R Q, Tang X Q. Interaction force measurement of parallel robots based on structure-integrated force sensors using interpretable linear neural networks. Mechatronics, 2022, 87: 102895
Li W, Lin C X, Gao F, Guo W Z. The kinematics and design for isotropy of six-DOF 3-CCC parallel mechanisms of general geometry and arbitrary actuation schemes. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 178: 105091
Luces M, Mills J K, Benhabib B. A review of redundant parallel kinematic mechanisms. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2017, 86(2): 175–198
Han G, Xie F G, Liu X J. Evaluation of the power consumption of a high-speed parallel robot. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 167–178
Meng Q Z, Xie F G, Liu X J. Conceptual design and kinematic analysis of a novel parallel robot for high-speed pick-and-place operations. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 211–224
Tang X Q. An overview of the development for cable-driven parallel manipulator. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 6: 823028
Zarebidoki M, Dhupia J S, Xu W L. A review of cable-driven parallel robots: typical configurations, analysis techniques, and control methods. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2022, 29(3): 89–106
Morinaga A, Ogawa T, Iwanaga K, Shimomoto Y, Yamamoto I. Development of motion reduction device for ship using underactuated parallel link mechanism. Sensors and Materials, 2021, 33(3): 897–906
Silva D, Garrido J, Riveiro E. Stewart platform motion control automation with industrial resources to perform cycloidal and oceanic wave trajectories. Machines, 2022, 10(8): 711
Idà E, Bruckmann T, Carricato M. Rest-to-rest trajectory planning for underactuated cable-driven parallel robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2019, 35(6): 1338–1351
Qian L, Yao R, Sun J H, Xu J L, Pan Z C, Jiang P. Fast: its scientific achievements and prospects. The Innovation, 2020, 1(3): 100053
Zhang Z K, Shao Z F, You Z, Tang X Q, Zi B, Yang G L, Gosselin C, Caro S. State-of-the-art on theories and applications of cable-driven parallel robots. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 17(3): 37
Gouttefarde M, Lamaury J, Reichert C, Bruckmann T. A versatile tension distribution algorithm for n-DOF parallel robots driven by n + 2 cables. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015, 31(6): 1444–1457
Jamshidifar H, Khajepour A, Fidan B, Rushton M. Kinematicallyconstrained redundant cable-driven parallel robots: modeling, redundancy analysis, and stiffness optimization. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(2): 921–930
Cui Z W, Tang X Q, Hou S H, Sun H N. Research on controllable stiffness of redundant cable-driven parallel robots. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2018, 23(5): 2390–2401
Garg V, Nokleby S B, Carretero J A. Wrench capability analysis of redundantly actuated spatial parallel manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, 44(5): 1070–1081
Nokleby S B, Fisher R, Podhorodeski R P, Firmani F. Force capabilities of redundantly-actuated parallel manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2005, 40(5): 578–599
Pashkevich A, Wenger P, Chablat D. Design strategies for the geometric synthesis of Orthoglide-type mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2005, 40(8): 907–930
Inner B, Kucuk S. A novel kinematic design, analysis and simulation tool for general Stewart platforms. Simulation, 2013, 89(7): 876–897
Xie Z H, Li G, Liu G F, Zhao J. Optimal design of a Stewart platform using the global transmission index under determinate constraint of workspace. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(10): 1–14
Liu X J, Wu C, Wang J S. A new approach for singularity analysis and closeness measurement to singularities of parallel manipulators. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2012, 4(4): 041001
Xie F G, Liu X J, Wang J S. A 3-DOF parallel manufacturing module and its kinematic optimization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2012, 28(3): 334–343
Wang Y H, Tang X Q, Xiang C Y, Hou S H. Force sensitivity analysis and scale design of Stewart parallel manipulator. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 13(7): 16878140211035996
Isaksson M, Gosselin C, Marlow K. An introduction to utilising the redundancy of a kinematically redundant parallel manipulator to operate a gripper. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, 101: 50–59
Vieira H L, Fontes J V D C, Da Silva M M. Reliable redundancy resolution strategies for kinematically redundant parallel manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 167: 104531
Yao J T, Gu W D, Feng Z Q, Chen L P, Xu Y D, Zhao Y S. Dynamic analysis and driving force optimization of a 5-DOF parallel manipulator with redundant actuation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 48: 51–58
Müller A. On the terminology and geometric aspects of redundant parallel manipulators. Robotica, 2013, 31(1): 137–147
Mousavi M R, Ghanbari M, Moosavian S A A, Zarafshan P. Explicit dynamics of redundant parallel cable robots. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 94(3): 2077–2096
Jamshidifar H, Khosravani S, Fidan B, Khajepour A. Vibration decoupled modeling and robust control of redundant cable-driven parallel robots. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2018, 23(2): 690–701
Santos J C, Chemori A, Gouttefarde M. Redundancy resolution integrated model predictive control of CDPRs: concept, implementation and experiments. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Paris: IEEE, 2020, 3889–3895
Merlet J P. On the redundancy of cable-driven parallel robots. In: Flores P, Viadero F, eds. New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science. Cham: Springer, 2015, 31–39
Sun G Y, Liu Z, Gao H B, Li N, Ding L, Deng Z Q. Direct method for tension feasible region calculation in multi-redundant cable-driven parallel robots using computational geometry. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2021, 158: 104225
Gao H B, Sun G Y, Liu Z, Sun C, Li N, Ding L, Yu H T, Deng Z Q. Tension distribution algorithm based on graphics with high computational efficiency and robust optimization for two-redundant cable-driven parallel robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 172: 104739
Qi R H, Khajepour A, Melek W W. Redundancy resolution and disturbance rejection via torque optimization in hybrid cable-driven robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(7): 4069–4079
Schenk C, Bülthoff H H, Masone C. Robust adaptive sliding mode control of a redundant cable driven parallel robot. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing. Cheile Gradistei: IEEE, 2015, 427–434
Peng J Q, Zhang C, Ge D M, Han Y. Two trajectory tracking control methods for space hyper-redundant cable-driven robots considering model uncertainty. Multibody System Dynamics, 2022, 56(2): 123–152
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975307).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Tang, X. Comparison of internal force antagonism between redundant cable-driven parallel robots and redundant rigid parallel robots. Front. Mech. Eng. 18, 51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0767-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0767-x