Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 232–242 | Cite as

Tool path strategy and cutting process monitoring in intelligent machining

  • Ming Chen
  • Chengdong Wang
  • Qinglong An
  • Weiwei Ming
Research Article


Intelligent machining is a current focus in advanced manufacturing technology, and is characterized by high accuracy and efficiency. A central technology of intelligent machining—the cutting process online monitoring and optimization—is urgently needed for mass production. In this research, the cutting process online monitoring and optimization in jet engine impeller machining, cranio-maxillofacial surgery, and hydraulic servo valve deburring are introduced as examples of intelligent machining. Results show that intelligent tool path optimization and cutting process online monitoring are efficient techniques for improving the efficiency, quality, and reliability of machining.


intelligent machining tool path strategy process optimization online monitoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51405294 and 51675204).


  1. 1.
    Li X H, Li W Y. The research on intelligent monitoring technology of NC machining process. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 56: 556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grzesik W. Chapter nineteen—Virtual/digital and internet-based machining. In: Grzesik W, ed. Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017, 505–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou B, Zhao J, Li L. CNC double spiral tool-path generation based on parametric surface mapping. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 67–68: 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang R, Hu P, Tang K. Five-axis finishing tool path generation for a mesh blade based on linear morphing cone. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2015, 2(4): 268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W X, Cai Y. The tool path planning of composed surface of bigtwisted blisk. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 174: 392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun Y, Xu J, Jin C, et al. Smooth tool path generation for 5-axis machining of triangular mesh surface with nonzero genus. Computer Aided Design, 2016, 79: 60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gowd G H, Goud M V, Theja K D, et al. Optimal selection of machining parameters in CNC turning process of EN-31 using intelligent hybrid decision making tools. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 97: 125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du X, Huang J, Zhu L. An analytical transition algorithm for realtime CNC machining of linear tool path. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 56: 344–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu K, Wang J, Chu C H, et al. Cutting force and machine kinematics constrained cutter location planning for five-axis flank milling of ruled surfaces. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammad AWA, Rey D, Akbarnezhad A. A cutting plane algorithm for the site layout planning problem with travel barriers. Computers & Operations Research, 2017, 82: 36–51MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sokolov I L, Cherkasov V R, Tregubov AA, et al. Smart materials on the way to theranostic nanorobots: Molecular machines and nanomotors, advanced biosensors, and intelligent vehicles for drug delivery. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, 2017, 1861(6): 1530–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai Z, Geng J, Zhang C, et al. Systematic solving of machining deformation and process optimization for complex thin-walled parts. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 56: 167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toh C K. A modified offset cutter path strategy for high-speed rough milling hardened steel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2003, 217 (8): 1161–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou M, Zheng G, Chen S. Identification and looping tool path generation for removing residual areas left by pocket roughing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(1–4): 765–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan H, Xi G, Wang W, et al. An efficient five-axis machining method of centrifugal impeller based on regional milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(1–4): 789–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao X, Mou W, Peng Y. An intelligent process planning method based on feature-based history machining data for aircraft structural parts. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 56: 585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen Y, Huang Z, Chen L, et al. Parametric process planning based on feature parameters of parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 28(7–8): 727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Möhring H C, Wiederkehr P. Intelligent fixtures for high performance machining. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 46: 383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lauro C H, Brandão L C, Baldo D, et al. Monitoring and processing signal applied in machining processes—A review. Measurement, 2014, 58: 73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dornfeld A D. In-process recognition of cutting states. JSME International Journal. Series C, Dynamics, Control, Robotics, Design and Manufacturing, 1994, 37(4): 638–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cus F, Milfelner M, Balic J. An intelligent system for monitoring and optimization of ball-end milling process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 175(1–3): 90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ratava J, Lohtander M, Varis J. Tool condition monitoring in interrupted cutting with acceleration sensors. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 47: 70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frangos M. Uncertainty quantification for cuttings transport process monitoring while drilling by ensemble Kalman filtering. Journal of Process Control, 2017, 53: 46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eufinger H, Wittkampf A R M, Wehmöller M, et al. Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: A new method of computer-aided surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 1998, 26(6): 373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heidemann W, Gerlach K L, Gröbel K H, et al. Drill free screws: A new form of osteosynthesis screw. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 1998, 26(3): 163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang S, Yang J, Gee J C. Cranio-maxillofacial surgery simulation based on pre-specified target face configurations. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science C: Computers & Electronics, 2010, 11(7): 504–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim K H, Cho C H, Jeon S Y, et al. Drilling and deburring in a single process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2003, 217 (9): 1327–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim K H, Park N J. A new deburring tool for intersecting holes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2005, 219(12): 865–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ton T P, Park H Y, Ko S L. Experimental analysis of deburring process on inclined exit surface by new deburring tool. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 60(1): 129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming Chen
    • 1
  • Chengdong Wang
    • 2
  • Qinglong An
    • 1
  • Weiwei Ming
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Electric EngineeringSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations